Best AI meeting notetakers for Consultants & Agencies (2026)
For consultants & agencies, Fellow is our pick (from $11/mo): Fellow runs $7/seat/mo on an annual plan, well below Fireflies.ai's $10/seat/mo, a real gap once billing scales across many client accounts. Client-facing teams billing against meetings across many accounts, where in-person capture and a low per-seat cost decide it. Below is the full ranking and the tradeoffs, or read how we score.
If you sign up through links on this page, vsref may earn a commission; programs exist on both sides of most comparisons, and commissions never change verdicts. How we make money
Reviewed by vsref Editorialfacts verified Aug 24, 2026Methodology →
What matters for consultants & agencies
Weight ×5 = decisive, ×1 = relevant| Fact | Fellow | Fireflies.ai | Otter.ai | Bluedot | Granola |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price per seat (billed annually)×5 | 7 $/seat/moJul 20 | 10 $/seat/moJul 20 | 8.33 $/seat/moJul 20 | 14 $/seat/moJul 20 | n/a |
| Bot-free capture option×4 | ✓ YesJul 20 | ✓ YesJul 20 | ✓ YesJul 20 | ✓ YesJul 20 | ✓ YesJul 20 |
| In-person / mobile capture×4 | ✓ YesJul 20 | ✓ YesJul 20 | ✓ YesJul 20 | ✓ In-person via mobile appJul 20 | ✓ YesJul 20 |
| Recording storage limit×3 | Team 1yr; Business annual+ unlimitedJul 20 | 8,000 min/seat Pro; unlimited Business+Jul 20 | unlimited (paid)Jul 20 | unlimited (paid plans)Jul 20 | Unlimited notes; audio not storedJul 20 |
| Transcript export formats×2 | Word Doc, video, transcript, recapJul 20 | PDF, DOCX, SRT, CSV, JSON, MDJul 20 | TXT, DOCX, PDF, SRTJul 20 | n/a | Markdown copy only (no PDF/DOCX)Jul 20 |
The ranking, tool by tool
Fellow runs $7/seat/mo on an annual plan, well below Fireflies.ai's $10/seat/mo, a real gap once billing scales across many client accounts. Full Fellow vs Fireflies.ai verdict →
Fireflies.ai costs $10/seat/mo on the annual plan versus $16/seat/mo for Fathom, a meaningful saving for agencies billing seats across many client accounts. Full Fireflies.ai vs Fathom verdict →
Fireflies.ai costs $10/seat/mo on its annual plan, well below Colibri.ai's $16/seat/mo, a meaningful gap when billing many client accounts. Full Fireflies.ai vs Colibri.ai verdict →
Fireflies.ai is meaningfully cheaper on the annual per-seat price that matters most for billing across many client accounts, at $10/seat/mo versus $15/seat/mo for Read AI. Full Fireflies.ai vs Read AI verdict →
Fireflies.ai comes in cheaper on the annual per-seat price that matters most for a multi-account roster, at $10/seat/mo versus $12.79/seat/mo for Laxis. Full Fireflies.ai vs Laxis verdict →
Billed annually, Fireflies.ai runs $10/seat/mo, undercutting even Granola's only published rate of $14/seat/mo, which matters most for agencies watching per seat cost across many client accounts. Full Fireflies.ai vs Granola verdict →
Billed annually, Fireflies.ai costs $10/seat/mo, and Jump does not publish an annual rate, only a flat $100/seat/mo, well above Fireflies.ai's monthly price of $18/seat/mo, which decides this for agencies watching per seat cost across many accounts. Full Fireflies.ai vs Jump verdict →
For client facing teams billing across many accounts, the annual per seat price is what decides it. Full Fireflies.ai vs Grain verdict →
For agencies billing across many accounts, the annual per seat rate is the deciding number: Fireflies.ai runs $10/seat/mo against Wudpecker's $15.2/seat/mo, a meaningful gap once a team scales past a couple of seats. Full Fireflies.ai vs Wudpecker verdict →
For agencies billing across many accounts, the annual seat price carries the most weight, and Fireflies.ai's rate of $10/seat/mo beats Zoom AI Companion's $14.16/seat/mo. Full Fireflies.ai vs Zoom AI Companion verdict →
Fireflies.ai publishes a clear annual rate of $10/seat/mo, while Gong does not publish a per seat price at all and requires contacting sales, making costs hard to plan across many client accounts. Full Fireflies.ai vs Gong verdict →
For consultants and agencies billing against many client meetings, a professional capture experience matters. Full Fireflies.ai vs Spinach verdict →
For consultants and agencies watching per-seat costs, Fireflies.ai's annual price of $10/seat/mo is nearly half of tl;dv's $18/seat/mo, a meaningful gap when billing scales across client accounts. Full Fireflies.ai vs tl;dv verdict →
For consultants and agencies watching per-seat costs across many client accounts, price is decisive. Full Fireflies.ai vs Sybill verdict →
On annual billing Fireflies.ai costs $10 per seat per month against Avoma's $19, nearly half the price, a decisive saving for agencies staffing many seats across client accounts. Full Fireflies.ai vs Avoma verdict →
Otter.ai's annual rate runs $8.33/seat/mo, well under Granola's only published rate of $14/seat/mo, and that gap matters when a consulting practice is billing seats across many client accounts. Full Otter.ai vs Granola verdict →
For agencies billing meetings across many client accounts, annual per seat cost matters most, and Otter.ai comes in at $8.33/seat/mo compared to $14.16/seat/mo for Zoom AI Companion, nearly half the price at scale. Full Otter.ai vs Zoom AI Companion verdict →
Otter.ai's annual per-seat price is $8.33/seat/mo, compared with $21/seat/mo for Microsoft Copilot in Teams, a large gap for agencies billing seats across many client accounts. Full Otter.ai vs Microsoft Copilot in Teams verdict →
For a client-facing team billing across many accounts, seat cost is the biggest lever, and Otter.ai wins it decisively at $8.33/seat/mo on an annual plan against tl;dv's $18/seat/mo, more than double. Full Otter.ai vs tl;dv verdict →
Both tools keep annual seat pricing close, Otter.ai at $8.33/seat/mo against Tactiq's $8/seat/mo, so cost alone barely separates them. Full Otter.ai vs Tactiq verdict →
Otter.ai wins on price: $8.33/seat/mo annually versus $10/seat/mo for Fireflies.ai, a real gap for agencies billing many seats across client accounts. Full Otter.ai vs Fireflies.ai verdict →
Both Otter.ai and Sybill confirm they capture in-person and mobile meetings, and both offer a bot-free recording option, so those needs are met either way. Full Otter.ai vs Sybill verdict →
Otter.ai's cheapest paid plan runs $16.99/mo against Supernormal's $20/mo, a real saving for agencies watching seat costs across accounts. Full Otter.ai vs Supernormal verdict →
Otter.ai's annual seat price is $8.33/seat/mo, below Sembly AI's $10/seat/mo, a real saving for agencies billing many seats across client accounts. Full Otter.ai vs Sembly AI verdict →
Otter.ai's annual seat price is $8.33/seat/mo, well below Read AI's $15/seat/mo, a major saving for agencies billing many seats across client accounts. Full Otter.ai vs Read AI verdict →
The annual seat price decides this for agencies billing across many accounts: Otter.ai runs $8.33/seat/mo against Gemini in Google Meet (Take notes for me) at $14/seat/mo, a wide gap. Full Otter.ai vs Gemini in Google Meet (Take notes for me) verdict →
For agencies billing across many client accounts, low seat cost and the ability to capture meetings in person decide this. Full Otter.ai vs Metaview verdict →
For agencies billing many accounts, the annual per-seat rate decides this. Full Otter.ai vs MeetGeek verdict →
Krisp's annual rate is $8/seat/mo and Otter.ai's is $8.33/seat/mo, close enough to call similar for a consulting practice pricing out seats across many client accounts. Full Otter.ai vs Krisp verdict →
Otter.ai's annual seat price runs $8.33/seat/mo, well under Fathom's $16/seat/mo, a large gap for an agency scaling seats across client accounts. Full Otter.ai vs Fathom verdict →
Low per seat cost is what decides this for a client facing team billing across many accounts, and Bluedot's annual rate of $14/seat/mo undercuts Jamie's $21/seat/mo by a wide margin. Full Bluedot vs Jamie verdict →
Bluedot publishes a $14/seat/mo annual rate, the figure that matters most for agencies planning a client roster, while Granola's annual seat price is not published, only its $14/seat/mo monthly rate. Full Bluedot vs Granola verdict →
Granola's cheapest paid seat is $14/seat/mo billed monthly, well below Jamie's $21/seat/mo annual rate, its lowest published tier, a meaningful gap for agencies paying per seat across many client accounts. Full Granola vs Jamie verdict →
Granola's cheapest disclosed seat price is $14/seat/mo, still lower than Circleback's discounted annual rate of $20.83/seat/mo, which matters most for agencies billing seats across many client accounts. Full Granola vs Circleback verdict →
Granola's only published seat rate is $14/seat/mo, while Superpowered's annual rate comes to $54/seat/mo, a wide gap for a consulting practice billing seats across many client accounts. Full Granola vs Superpowered verdict →
Granola's per seat pricing is $14/seat/mo, well under Fathom's annual rate of $16/seat/mo, and that gap matters most for agencies billing many seats across client accounts. Full Granola vs Fathom verdict →
Grain's annual per-seat price is $15/seat/mo, well below tl;dv's $18/seat/mo, a real difference for agencies billing many small accounts. Full Grain vs tl;dv verdict →
Grain costs $15/seat/mo on the annual plan versus $16/seat/mo for Fathom, a modest edge for agencies billing seats across many client accounts. Full Grain vs Fathom verdict →
For client-facing work billed against meetings across many accounts, both let you capture without a bot: Gemini in Google Meet costs $14/seat/mo on annual billing versus Zoom AI Companion at $14.16/seat/mo, so per-seat cost is close but favors Gemini in Google Meet. Full Gemini in Google Meet (Take notes for me) vs Zoom AI Companion verdict →
Laxis publishes an annual per-seat price of $12.79/seat/mo and unlimited paid storage, numbers Gong does not publish at all since it sells through custom contracts. Full Laxis vs Gong verdict →
Client-facing teams billing across many accounts often cannot have a visible recording bot in sensitive client meetings. Full BrightHire vs Metaview verdict →
For agencies watching per-seat costs across many accounts, the annual seat rate decides this first. Full Notta vs Otter.ai verdict →
Avoma offers a bot-free capture option and confirmed in-person and mobile capture, while Clari Copilot only supports bot-based capture with no bot-free option, a real gap for consultants who record client meetings in person as well as on video. Full Avoma vs Clari Copilot verdict →
Low per seat cost decides this for agencies billing across many client accounts, and Avoma's annual plan runs $19/seat/mo, a published rate Gong does not disclose. Full Avoma vs Gong verdict →
Gong confirms in person and mobile capture plus a bot free capture option, both important for consultants moving between client sites and video calls. Full Gong vs Clari Copilot verdict →
For consultants and agencies billing across many client accounts, bot-free capture matters because it avoids an obtrusive recording bot showing up in every client call. Full Gong vs Jiminny verdict →
For client-facing teams working across many accounts, in-person and mobile capture matters, and Gong confirms this: yes, with dedicated iOS and Android apps. Full Gong vs Chorus by ZoomInfo verdict →
Sybill publishes an annual per-seat price of $30/seat/mo, while Gong does not disclose annual pricing, a clear win for cost-conscious consultants billing across many accounts. Full Sybill vs Gong verdict →
Jiminny confirms in person and mobile capture, letting client facing teams record onsite meetings the same way as video calls, and it publishes a clear seat price at $42/seat/mo, so agencies billing across many accounts can plan cost per client. Full Jiminny vs Chorus by ZoomInfo verdict →
Fireflies.ai and Sembly AI price the same on the annual per-seat plan, at $10/seat/mo each. Full Sembly AI vs Fireflies.ai verdict →
Fathom's annual seat price is $16/seat/mo against tl;dv's $18/seat/mo, a real gap for an agency adding seats across client accounts. Full Fathom vs tl;dv verdict →
On annual billing Fathom runs $16 per seat per month against Avoma's $19, a real saving for agencies staffing many seats across client accounts. Full Fathom vs Avoma verdict →
Client-facing teams that bill against meetings across many accounts often need to capture without a bot joining sensitive client calls. Full Chorus by ZoomInfo vs Clari Copilot verdict →
Zoom AI Companion costs $14.16/seat/mo on an annual plan, versus $16/seat/mo for Fathom, a meaningful saving once billing scales across many client accounts. Full Zoom AI Companion vs Fathom verdict →
AI meeting notes + automations. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
Sales conversation intelligence (ex-Wingman). No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
Real-time conversation intelligence for sales. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
Native AI meeting recap for Microsoft Teams. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
Bot-free, privacy-first EU meeting notes. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
Vertical AI notetaker/co-pilot for wealth management: CRM-synced notes, pre-meeting prep, and follow-ups; SOC 2 Type II, 35,000+ advisors. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
Noise cancellation + AI meeting notes. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
AI meeting recorder & notetaker. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
Recruiting-vertical AI notetaker: captures interviews on Zoom/Meet/Teams/Webex and produces scorecard-ready, ATS-integrated candidate notes rather than generic meeting summaries. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
AI meeting + email copilot. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
AI meeting notes / AI scrum master. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
Bot-free AI notetaker + agentic work. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
Privacy-first, bot-free meeting notes: no bots join calls, meetings are not recorded, audio is transcribed live and deleted immediately. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
Bot-free AI meeting notetaker. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
AI meeting recorder and notetaker. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.
Positions on customizable, template-driven meeting notes with both a joining bot and a botless desktop recorder, EU-hosted (GDPR). No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.