Fireflies.ai vs Otter.ai
This is the verified Fireflies.ai vs Otter.ai breakdown: Fireflies.ai (AI meeting notetaker with CRM sync) and Otter.ai (AI meeting notetaker & transcription) are AI meeting notetakers platforms, priced from $10/seat/mo and $8.33/seat/mo respectively. The bottom line, head-to-head facts, and true cost tiers follow.
Fireflies.ai wins the broader comparison, taking six of the seven use cases to Otter.ai's one. It leads on privacy and compliance, since Fireflies.ai includes a HIPAA BAA with its plans while Otter.ai only offers one as a paid add-on, and Fireflies.ai excludes customer data from AI training while Otter.ai does not. For solo and free users, Fireflies.ai's free tier offers unlimited transcription minutes versus Otter.ai's cap of 300 min/mo. Recruiters and sales teams both benefit from Fireflies.ai's broader transcript export formats (PDF, DOCX, SRT, CSV, JSON, MD) and wider integrations. Otter.ai only wins for consultants and agencies, where its lower annual price of $8.33/seat/mo against $10/seat/mo for Fireflies.ai and unlimited storage tip the balance.
Reviewed by vsref Editorialfacts verified Jul 20, 2026Methodology →
Fireflies.ai is our pick for most teams. Start there, or weigh the use-case verdicts below.
If you sign up through links on this page, vsref may earn a commission; programs exist on both sides of most comparisons, and commissions never change verdicts. How we make money
Fireflies.ai vs Otter.ai: head-to-head facts
Every row independently verified| Fact | Fireflies.ai | Otter.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price per seat (billed monthly) | 18 $/seat/moJul 20 | 16.99 $/seat/moJul 20 |
| Price per seat (billed annually) | 10 $/seat/moJul 20 | 8.33 $/seat/moJul 20 |
| What the free tier caps | 400 min storage/team, 20 AI creditsJul 20 | 300 min/mo, 30 min/meeting, 25 recent convosJul 20 |
| Capture method | hybridJul 20 | hybridJul 20 |
| Bot-free capture option | ✓ YesJul 20 | ✓ YesJul 20 |
| Meeting platforms supported | Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, Webex, GoToMeetingJul 20 | Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft TeamsJul 20 |
| Languages supported | ~100Jul 20 | ~6Jul 20 |
| AI meeting summary | ✓ YesJul 20 | ✓ YesJul 20 |
| SOC 2 Type II | ✓ SOC 2 Type IIJul 20 | ✓ SOC 2 Type II reportJul 20 |
Fireflies.ai vs Otter.ai pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers
Real monthly bill for a team, from published per-seat rates on annual billing. Free-only or platform-bundled tools show n/a; their free-tier cap is the story.Fireflies.ai vs Otter.ai: verdicts by use case
Otter.ai wins on price: $8.33/seat/mo annually versus $10/seat/mo for Fireflies.ai, a real gap for agencies billing many seats across client accounts. Neither tool leads on capture, since both cover in person and mobile recording and both offer a bot free way to join meetings. Storage favors simplicity too: Otter.ai is unlimited on paid plans, while Fireflies.ai caps Pro seats at 8,000 minutes and only goes unlimited on Business and above. Fireflies.ai does export to more file formats, but that matters less than seat cost when billing scales across many client accounts.
Fireflies.ai connects to more of the tools engineering teams already rely on, including Slack, Notion, Zapier, Linear, and Airtable, while Otter.ai covers Slack, Notion, and Zapier. Linear support matters directly for standups that need to land as tickets, not just notes. Both tools turn meetings into automatic action items, both offer a public API for custom pipelines, and both generate an AI summary, so the wider integration list is what separates them for async engineering syncs. Otter.ai is slightly cheaper per seat annually, but that does not offset the missing Linear connection for this workflow.
Fireflies.ai includes a HIPAA BAA at no extra step, while Otter.ai only offers one as a paid add on, a meaningful gap for healthcare and legal teams. Fireflies.ai also excludes customer data from AI training by default; Otter.ai does not make that guarantee. Both tools offer a bot free capture option and both support GDPR and EU data residency, so those needs are met either way, and both provide custom retention controls on their Enterprise plans. On the two truly non negotiable requirements for compliance sensitive buyers, HIPAA coverage and training exclusion, Fireflies.ai is the safer default.
Both tools offer clips and highlight reels, video recording, and an ask your meeting AI chat, so researchers get the core interview workflow either way. The difference shows up in what you can pull out afterward: Fireflies.ai exports transcripts as PDF, DOCX, SRT, CSV, JSON, and MD, while Otter.ai covers TXT, DOCX, PDF, and SRT, giving Fireflies.ai a structured data edge for feeding sessions into research tools. Fireflies.ai also supports 100 languages against Otter.ai's 6, useful for research teams running international interviews. With the core clip and chat features tied, the wider export options and language coverage make Fireflies.ai the stronger pick for querying across many sessions.
For recruiters capturing candidate interviews, clean, speaker-labeled notes and smooth exports into the ATS matter most. Both tools offer an AI meeting summary and speaker identification, so those features are not the deciding factor here. Fireflies.ai pulls ahead on transcript exports, supporting PDF, DOCX, SRT, CSV, JSON, and MD, compared with Otter.ai's TXT, DOCX, PDF, and SRT, giving recruiters more direct paths into an ATS. Fireflies.ai also connects to more tools, adding Linear and Airtable alongside Slack, Notion, and Zapier. Otter.ai is cheaper on annual billing, at $8.33/seat/mo versus $10/seat/mo for Fireflies.ai, but that price gap does not outweigh Fireflies.ai's export and integration advantage for this use case.
Fireflies.ai connects to four CRMs, Salesforce, HubSpot, Affinity, and Redtail, while Otter.ai connects to two, Salesforce and HubSpot, which matters most for reps who need every call synced automatically. Both tools generate automatic action items, both offer clips and highlight reels, and both provide live transcription, so those needs are met either way. Otter.ai is cheaper per seat annually at $8.33/seat/mo versus $10/seat/mo for Fireflies.ai, but for a sales team that lives inside its CRM, the wider integration list outweighs the seat price gap.
Fireflies.ai's free tier caps only storage and AI credits, at 400 minutes of team storage and 20 AI credits, while transcription itself is unlimited. Otter.ai's free tier caps transcription directly at 300 minutes a month, 30 minutes per meeting, and 25 recent conversations. For an individual who wants to record often without hitting a wall, unlimited transcription minutes is the bigger win. Otter.ai's paid plan is a little cheaper monthly at $16.99/seat/mo against $18/seat/mo for Fireflies.ai, but that gap is small next to the free tier's unlimited transcription. Both tools include an AI meeting summary and both use a hybrid capture method.
Fireflies.ai vs Otter.ai: common questions
Is Fireflies.ai cheaper than Otter.ai?+−
No, Otter.ai is the cheaper option overall. On monthly billing, Otter.ai costs $16.99/seat/mo compared to $18/seat/mo for Fireflies.ai. On annual billing, Otter.ai costs $8.33/seat/mo compared to $10/seat/mo for Fireflies.ai. Fireflies.ai comes out more expensive on both billing cycles.
Fireflies.ai vs Otter.ai: which is better for consultants & agencies?+−
Otter.ai is the better fit for consultants and agencies. Its annual per-seat price runs $8.33/seat/mo, versus $10/seat/mo for Fireflies.ai, a meaningful gap when billing many seats across client accounts. Otter.ai also offers unlimited storage on paid plans, while Fireflies.ai caps Pro seats at 8,000 minutes. Fireflies.ai does export to more file formats, but that matters less than seat cost and storage for agencies working across many clients.
Does Fireflies.ai or Otter.ai support more languages?+−
Fireflies.ai supports around 100 languages, while Otter.ai supports 6. If your meetings run in multiple languages, Fireflies.ai offers far broader coverage.
Is Fireflies.ai or Otter.ai better for HIPAA compliance?+−
Fireflies.ai includes a HIPAA BAA as part of its plans, while Otter.ai only offers one as a paid add-on. For healthcare teams that need a signed BAA without extra cost, Fireflies.ai is the more direct option.
Which has better CRM integrations, Fireflies.ai or Otter.ai?+−
Fireflies.ai integrates with Salesforce, HubSpot, Affinity, and Redtail. Otter.ai integrates with Salesforce and HubSpot. Fireflies.ai covers two more CRMs, which matters for teams outside the Salesforce and HubSpot mainstream.
What does Otter.ai's free plan include?+−
Otter.ai's free plan caps transcription at 300 minutes a month, 30 minutes per meeting, and keeps your 25 most recent conversations. It's meant for light, occasional use rather than daily meetings.
Does Fireflies.ai keep customer data out of AI model training?+−
Yes. Fireflies.ai excludes customer data from AI training by default. Otter.ai does not make the same guarantee, which matters for teams handling sensitive meeting content.
How many meeting platforms does Fireflies.ai work with?+−
Fireflies.ai supports Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, Webex, and GoToMeeting, five platforms in total, more than Otter.ai's Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams.
Best Fireflies.ai alternatives →Best Otter.ai alternatives →
When neither is right: weigh the rest of the AI meeting notetakers field →
If you sign up through links on this page, vsref may earn a commission; programs exist on both sides of most comparisons, and commissions never change verdicts. How we make money