12 Best LiveKit Agents Alternatives (2026)
LiveKit Agents is realtime infra + agents (oss + cloud). Teams that switch usually cite price at production volume, compliance requirements, deeper pipeline control, outbound campaign tooling, an out-of-the-box receptionist, ecommerce order handling. The alternatives below are ranked by published head-to-head verdicts, not sponsorship.
On our facts, LiveKit Agents is the 9th-highest included concurrency of 13 - the kind of gap teams cite when they go looking.
Not ready to switch? Full LiveKit Agents review →
If you sign up through links on this page, vsref may earn a commission; programs exist on both sides of most comparisons, and commissions never change verdicts. How we make money
Reviewed by vsref Editorialfacts verified Oct 3, 2026Methodology →
Where to switch, by reason
All 75 voice ai alternatives
How the top LiveKit Agents alternatives compare
A closer look at the top 6: each LiveKit Agents alternative's standing among Voice AI peers, its verdict record against LiveKit Agents, and the trade-offs of leaving.
1. Bland AI
Among the 31 voice ai tools we track, Bland AI has the 12th-widest language coverage.
Our use-case verdicts have Bland AI ahead of LiveKit Agents for no-code agency deploys, ecommerce support and orders, outbound sales campaigns and smb receptionist and booking and matches it for healthcare compliance.
Seen from the other side, LiveKit Agents vs Bland AI: ~95% cheaper, about half the base concurrency, adds bring-your-own llm.
Bland AI lists $0.14 per minute, verified July 2026.
Why teams switch: Bland AI includes native outbound campaigns, warm transfer to human, and a no-code agent builder, all critical for sales workflows. LiveKit Agents explicitly lacks native outbound campaign support and does not include warm transfer or a no-code builder, meaning custom engineering is required to replicate that functionality. For an outbound sales and call-center use case, the absence of native campaign support in LiveKit Agents is a decisive gap.
Outbound sales campaigns verdict →
Overall verdict: Bland AI wins for non-technical and business teams: it offers a no-code builder (fact 2618ade6), native outbound campaigns (3bf81179), a 99.9% uptime SLA on all plans (030f8723), and a predictable $0.14/min all-in rate (a65f00a4). LiveKit Agents wins for developer or cost-sensitive teams: its base rate is $0.01/min (7e98590c), LLM and TTS costs pass through at cost (aa91895d), it supports bring-your-own LLM (b220732f), and it includes 1,000 free session minutes monthly with no credit card required (a0c699e0). Neither tool dominates across all buyer types.
| Monthly volume | All-in monthly bill |
|---|---|
| 1K min/moSolo builder | $125 |
| 10K min/moAgency | $1,250 |
| 100K min/moCall center | $12,500 |
≈ $0.13 per minute all-in (est.), verified Jul 15, 2026. All-in monthly: platform fee + per-minute + telephony. Assumes GPT-4o class model, ElevenLabs voice. How we compute costs →
Full Bland AI vs LiveKit Agents comparison → · Bland AI review →
2. ElevenLabs Agents
Among the 31 voice ai tools we track, ElevenLabs Agents has the 4th-widest language coverage and the 3rd-lowest latency - a fit for multilingual and localization projects and real-time, conversational apps.
In our published verdicts, ElevenLabs Agents beats LiveKit Agents for no-code agency deploys, ecommerce support and orders, outbound sales campaigns and smb receptionist and booking.
The reverse angle matters too - LiveKit Agents vs ElevenLabs Agents: ~80% cheaper, adds native sip trunking.
Published pricing starts at $0.05 per minute, verified July 2026.
Why teams switch: For no-code agency deploys and white-label resale, ElevenLabs Agents has a native no-code agent builder (fact b5a43883), which LiveKit explicitly lacks (fact 6a17a853). Neither tool offers white-label sub-accounts: LiveKit explicitly states no (fact d58de082), and ElevenLabs has no supporting fact for white-label either. ElevenLabs wins narrowly because its no-code builder directly enables non-technical agency users to deploy agents, which is the core requirement, while LiveKit requires code for every deployment.
No-code agency deploys verdict →
Overall verdict: These tools suit different teams. LiveKit Agents wins for technical teams: BYO LLM and BYO TTS (b220732f, be42a4ff), native SIP trunking (6c030308), and a base rate of $0.01/min (7e98590c) give developers maximum control and lower infrastructure cost. ElevenLabs Agents wins for non-technical or speed-focused teams: a no-code builder (b5a43883) versus LiveKit having none (6a17a853), 75ms median latency (13b82148), and 70 languages (7340f19b) enable fast deployment without engineering resources. Neither dominates overall.
| Monthly volume | All-in monthly bill |
|---|---|
| 1K min/moSolo builder | $50 |
| 10K min/moAgency | $500 |
| 100K min/moCall center | $5,000 |
≈ $0.05 per minute all-in (est.), verified Jul 15, 2026. All-in monthly: platform fee + per-minute + telephony. Assumes GPT-4o class model, ElevenLabs voice. How we compute costs →
Full ElevenLabs Agents vs LiveKit Agents comparison → · ElevenLabs Agents review →
3. Retell AI
Among the 13 voice ai tools we track, Retell AI has the 5th-highest included concurrency - a fit for high-traffic deployments.
Head-to-head, Retell AI takes no-code agency deploys, ecommerce support and orders, outbound sales campaigns and smb receptionist and booking from LiveKit Agents.
Before switching, weigh what stays behind - LiveKit Agents vs Retell AI: ~85% cheaper, about half the base concurrency.
Its published rate is $0.07 per minute, verified July 2026.
Why teams switch: For no-code agency deploys and white-label resale, Retell AI offers a no-code agent builder (versus none in LiveKit), partial white-label support (versus none in LiveKit), native outbound campaigns, and a broader native integrations list including Go High Level, HubSpot, Make, and Zapier-compatible tools. LiveKit explicitly lacks a no-code builder and white-label capability, making it unsuitable for non-technical agency workflows. Retell also offers 20 concurrent calls on its base plan versus LiveKit's 5, giving agencies considerably more headroom.
No-code agency deploys verdict →
Overall verdict: These tools serve different teams. LiveKit Agents wins for engineering-led teams: the base price is $0.01/min versus $0.07/min, real costs run $0.0435-0.3135 versus $0.085-0.415 per minute, and LLM/TTS costs pass through at cost rather than being marked up. Retell AI wins for non-technical or ops-led teams: it offers a no-code agent builder, native outbound campaigns, a simulation and testing suite, partial white-label support, and 20 concurrent calls on the base plan versus only 5 for LiveKit. Each tool clearly fits a different buyer profile.
| Monthly volume | All-in monthly bill |
|---|---|
| 1K min/moSolo builder | $250 |
| 10K min/moAgency | $2,500 |
| 100K min/moCall center | $25,000 |
≈ $0.25 per minute all-in (est.), verified Jul 15, 2026. All-in monthly: platform fee + per-minute + telephony. Assumes GPT-4o class model, ElevenLabs voice. How we compute costs →
Full Retell AI vs LiveKit Agents comparison → · Retell AI review →
4. Vapi
Among the 23 voice ai tools we track, Vapi has the 7th-cheapest per-minute rate - a fit for cost-sensitive, high-volume work.
Our use-case verdicts have Vapi ahead of LiveKit Agents for no-code agency deploys, ecommerce support and orders, outbound sales campaigns and smb receptionist and booking.
Seen from the other side, LiveKit Agents vs Vapi: ~80% cheaper, about half the base concurrency.
Vapi lists $0.05 per minute, verified July 2026.
Why teams switch: For no-code agency deployments and white-label resale, Vapi wins on both critical dimensions. It offers a no-code agent builder (fact 450d1060) while LiveKit Agents explicitly has none (fact 6a17a853). On white-label support, Vapi provides partial sub-account capability (fact 7496ef62) while LiveKit offers none (fact d58de082). Vapi also adds native outbound campaigns and a testing suite, making it far more accessible for agencies without deep engineering resources.
No-code agency deploys verdict →
5. Pipecat
Among the 23 voice ai tools we track, Pipecat has the 3rd-cheapest per-minute rate - a fit for cost-sensitive, high-volume work.
Head-to-head, Pipecat takes healthcare compliance and outbound sales campaigns from LiveKit Agents and matches it for no-code agency deploys, custom pipeline control and smb receptionist and booking.
Its published rate is $0.01 per minute, verified July 2026.
Why teams switch: For HIPAA-bound healthcare workflows, the single most critical requirement is a HIPAA BAA. Pipecat includes the HIPAA BAA at no extra charge, while LiveKit Agents treats it as a paid add-on. That difference alone is decisive for any compliance-first healthcare buyer. Pipecat also confirms GDPR tooling and warm transfer to human, adding further compliance depth. LiveKit Agents holds SOC 2 Type II certification, but without a HIPAA BAA included in the base plan, it requires additional spend and negotiation before a healthcare deployment can proceed. Pipecat's combination of included HIPAA coverage and verified compliance features makes it the stronger fit here.
Healthcare compliance verdict →
Full Pipecat vs LiveKit Agents comparison → · Pipecat review →
6. Abby Connect
Among the 31 voice ai tools we track, Abby Connect has the 28th-widest language coverage.
Seen from the other side, LiveKit Agents vs Abby Connect: adds native sip trunking.