vsref

Rapida Review

OSS

Open-source (GPL-2.0 + branding terms) voice AI orchestration platform in Go/gRPC, aimed at agencies, CPaaS/CCaaS providers, and enterprises wanting white-label, multi-tenant voice operations with provider-level cost passthrough.

Among the 23 voice ai tools we track, Rapida has the 2nd-cheapest per-minute rate and the 2nd-highest included concurrency - a fit for cost-sensitive, high-volume work and high-traffic deployments.

From $0.01/min

Facts verified Jul 30, 2026Website →

What we know about Rapida

Rapida is a voice ai platform: open-source (GPL-2.0 + branding terms) voice AI orchestration platform in Go/gRPC, aimed at agencies, CPaaS/CCaaS providers, and enterprises wanting white-label, multi-tenant voice operations with provider-level cost passthrough. This profile tracks every Rapida fact we have verified, each linked to a primary source and dated.

On pricing, Rapida starts at $0.01 per minute for its entry tier. That is the sticker rate: real production cost usually runs higher once you add a language model, a voice provider, and telephony minutes.

New Rapida accounts get Launch plan free: 1 agent, BYO providers to test with before a card is required, which is enough to run a handful of real calls and judge latency and voice quality for your own script rather than a demo.

On capabilities, Rapida covers llm/tts costs passed through at cost?, native sip trunking, bring-your-own llm, bring-your-own tts voice, self-host / on-prem option, and self-serve signup. Each of those is verified against Rapida's own docs or dashboard, not marketing copy.

On performance, Rapida reports 200 concurrent sessions concurrent calls on the base plan. Latency figures are vendor claims until we measure them ourselves, and they are labeled that way on the Rapida fact sheet, so treat them as a starting point rather than a guarantee.

Placed against the 23 voice ai tools we track, Rapida's strongest showing is the 2nd-cheapest per-minute rate - a spread worth weighing against your own priorities.

In total we track 13 verified facts for Rapida today, each linking the primary source it came from so you can check our work - and vendor claims we have not measured ourselves are labeled as such on the Rapida fact sheet below.

Reviewed by vsref Editorialfacts verified Jul 30, 2026Methodology →

Rapida pricing

≈ $0.006 per minute all-in (est.) plus $500/mo platform fee, verified Jul 30, 2026 (source).

Rapida cost at monthly volume tiers
Monthly volumeAll-in monthly bill
1K min/moSolo builder$506
10K min/moAgency$560
100K min/moCall center$1,100

All-in monthly: platform fee + per-minute + telephony. Assumes GPT-4o class model, ElevenLabs voice. How we compute costs →

Fact sheet

Pricing
Pricing facts
Base price / min$0.01Jul 30
Concurrency limit (base)200 concurrent sessionsJul 30
Free tier creditLaunch plan free: 1 agent, BYO providersJul 30
Monthly platform fee$500Jul 30
LLM/TTS costs passed through at cost?✓ YesJul 30
Capabilities
Capabilities facts
Native SIP trunking✓ YesJul 30
Bring-your-own LLM✓ YesJul 30
Bring-your-own TTS voice✓ YesJul 30
Compliance & trust
Compliance & trust facts
Open-source licenseGPL-2.0 (modified), branding riderJul 30
Self-host / on-prem option✓ YesJul 30
Build experience
Build experience facts
White-label / sub-accounts for agencies✓ YesJul 30
Native integrations count (+ key ones: GHL, HubSpot, Zapier, Make, Twilio)HubSpot, Zendesk, Jira; 4 SDKs, REST/gRPCJul 30
Commercial
Commercial facts
Self-serve signup✓ YesJul 30

Considering a switch? Best Rapida alternatives →

TTS in this stack

Rapida lets you bring your own text-to-speech voice, so the voice engine is a separate pricing and quality decision. Compare the engines builders plug in most: ElevenLabs, Cartesia, OpenAI TTS, or the full text-to-speech comparison →

STT in this stack

A voice agent hears through its speech-to-text engine, and transcription accuracy and streaming latency are priced per audio minute. Compare the engines builders pair with Rapida: Deepgram, AssemblyAI, GPT-4o Transcribe, or the full speech-to-text comparison →