VVS
Bland AI logoUltravox logo

Bland AI vs Ultravox

Bland AI (Outbound-heavy, enterprise-leaning) and Ultravox (Realtime speech model + platform) are Voice AI platforms, priced from $0.14/min and $0.05/min respectively. Below: the bottom line, verified head-to-head facts, and real production costs.

Voice AI platforms · 31 facts compared · all sourcedPricing verified Jul 15, 2026
No-code agency deploys
Bland AI
WINNER
Custom pipeline control
Bland AI
WINNER
Ecommerce support and orders
Bland AI
WINNER
Healthcare compliance
Bland AI
WINNER
Outbound sales campaigns
Bland AI
WINNER
SMB receptionist and booking
Bland AI
WINNER

Head-to-head facts

FactBland AI logoBland AIUltravox logoUltravox
Base price / min~$0.14Jul 15~$0.05Jul 15
Real production cost / min$0.11-0.14Jul 15$0.06-0.06Jul 15
HIPAA BAA on base plan◑ Enterprise onlyJul 15n/a
Native SIP trunking✓ YesJul 15✓ YesJul 15
Concurrency limit (base)~10 callsJul 15~5 callsJul 15
Median e2e latency1,000 msJul 15n/a
Bring-your-own LLMn/a✗ NoJul 15
Free tier credit2 credits + inbound number ($15/mo value)Jul 1530 minutes free, then $0.05/minJul 15
✓buyer-good  ·  ✗not available  ·  ◑gated or partial  ·  production cost ranges are our estimates, see our methodology.
Swipe → to compare both tools. Each value links its source and verified date.

Pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers

All-in monthly: platform fee + per-minute + telephony. Assumes GPT-4o class model, ElevenLabs voice.
1K min/moSolo builder
Bland AI$125
UltravoxLOWEST$55
Includes estimated telephony. Free credits can offset the first month.
10K min/moAgency
Bland AI$1,250
UltravoxLOWEST$550
Volume pricing typically starts to apply at this tier.
100K min/moCall center
Bland AI$12,500
UltravoxLOWEST$5,500
Both platforms offer custom contracts at this tier. Negotiate.

Verdicts by use case

No-code agency deploys → Bland AI

Bland AI offers a native no-code agent builder, while Ultravox does not (facts 2618ade6 vs 9049ca31). Neither tool supports white-label or sub-accounts (facts 53004a40 and 7bead963), so that dimension is a tie. For agencies that need non-developer deployment workflows, Bland AI's no-code builder is the decisive differentiator.

Custom pipeline control → Bland AI

Both tools are API-first and self-serve, but Bland AI adds a no-code agent builder while Ultravox does not, giving engineering teams more flexibility to prototype and iterate pipelines without extra tooling. Bland AI also includes barge-in interruption handling whereas Ultravox does not, which matters for pipeline control over conversational flow. Ultravox wins on per-minute cost at $0.05 versus $0.14, but for pipeline control flexibility Bland AI edges ahead.

Ecommerce support and orders → Bland AI

For ecommerce support, a no-code agent builder is valuable for building and iterating order flows quickly. Bland AI offers a no-code builder while Ultravox does not (fact 2618ade6 vs 9049ca31). Bland AI also supports barge-in interruption handling while Ultravox does not, which is critical for natural customer interactions. Bland AI supports 40 languages vs Ultravox's 26 (facts 25b95a0e, 9b20a3df), broadening reach. Ultravox has a lower per-minute cost at $0.05 vs $0.14, but Bland AI's feature set for ecommerce flows is stronger overall.

Healthcare compliance → Bland AI

For HIPAA-bound healthcare workflows, the critical requirement is a HIPAA BAA. Bland AI offers a HIPAA BAA, though on enterprise plans only, which at least means it is obtainable. No equivalent HIPAA BAA availability is stated in any Ultravox fact, leaving that path unclear. Bland AI also carries SOC 2 Type II certification and GDPR tooling, providing a broader compliance posture. The enterprise-only restriction on the BAA is a drawback, but Bland AI still has a documented compliance path that Ultravox lacks in the provided facts.

Outbound sales campaigns → Bland AI

For outbound sales campaigns, Bland AI offers a no-code agent builder (Ultravox lacks one, per fact 9049ca31) and barge-in interruption handling (Ultravox does not support this, per ae0eaf39), both critical for natural sales conversations. Bland AI also provides a 99.9% uptime SLA on all plans, versus an enterprise-only SLA for Ultravox (facts 030f8723 and 5f60e330). Ultravox is cheaper at $0.05/min versus $0.14/min, and both support native outbound campaigns, so cost partially offsets Bland AI's advantages, keeping the margin narrow.

SMB receptionist and booking → Bland AI

For an SMB receptionist and booking use case, Bland AI offers a no-code agent builder, which Ultravox lacks, making it far more accessible to non-technical SMB owners. Bland AI also handles barge-in interruption while Ultravox does not, which matters for natural receptionist interactions. Bland AI supports 40 languages versus Ultravox's 26. Bland AI's per-minute cost is higher at $0.11 to $0.14 compared to Ultravox's $0.055, but the no-code builder and interruption handling advantages tip the balance for typical SMB operators who need ease of setup and natural conversation flow.

Common questions

Which is cheaper per minute, Bland AI or Ultravox?+

Ultravox has a lower base price at $0.05/min compared to Bland AI at $0.14/min. Estimated real production costs follow the same pattern: Ultravox runs about $0.055/min while Bland AI ranges from $0.11 to $0.14/min. However, Ultravox adds a $0.01/min telephony fee while Bland AI charges $0.00/min for telephony.

Do Bland AI or Ultravox offer a free trial?+

Both platforms offer a free starting point with no monthly platform fee. Bland AI provides 2 credits plus a free inbound number valued at $15 per month. Ultravox gives 30 free minutes, then charges $0.05 per minute after that. Neither requires an annual contract.

Which tool supports more concurrent calls out of the box?+

Bland AI includes 10 concurrent calls on its base plan, while Ultravox includes 5 concurrent calls on its base plan. If your operation needs higher concurrency from the start, Bland AI offers the larger default allowance.

Is Bland AI or Ultravox better for HIPAA-compliant healthcare use cases?+

Bland AI offers a HIPAA BAA, though it is available on enterprise plans only. No HIPAA-related information is listed for Ultravox in the available data. Bland AI also holds SOC 2 Type II certification and provides GDPR tooling, both of which may matter to compliance-sensitive buyers.

Does either platform let me build agents without writing code?+

Bland AI offers a no-code agent builder, while Ultravox does not. Both platforms support self-serve signup and are API-first. However, if your team needs a visual builder without dedicated engineering resources, Bland AI is the only option between the two.

Can callers interrupt the AI mid-sentence on either platform?+

Bland AI supports interruption handling (barge-in), while Ultravox does not. If natural two-way conversation where callers can cut in matters to your use case, Bland AI has this capability and Ultravox does not.

Which platform supports more languages?+

Bland AI is estimated to support approximately 40 languages, while Ultravox supports 26 languages per vendor claims. If multilingual coverage is a priority, Bland AI currently offers the broader language support.

Does Bland AI or Ultravox include an uptime SLA on standard plans?+

Bland AI provides a 99.9% uptime SLA on all plans, while Ultravox only offers priority SLA on its Enterprise plan. For teams that need guaranteed uptime without committing to an enterprise contract, Bland AI offers the stronger baseline commitment.

Best Bland AI alternatives →Best Ultravox alternatives →

When neither is right: browse all Voice AI platforms →

Try Bland AI free →Try Ultravox free →

If you sign up through links on this page, VS may earn a commission; programs exist on both sides of most comparisons, and commissions never change verdicts. How we make money