Cosine vs Devin
This is the verified Cosine vs Devin breakdown: Cosine ("The Sovereign AI Lab": coding agent + own post-trained Lumen models, pitched at regulated/air-gapped orgs and niche languages (COBOL, Fortran, Verilog). Formerly branded Genie (Genie CLI introduced Q2 2025). Secondary segment: terminal_agent (cos CLI).) and Devin (Autonomous cloud coding agent + terminal agent (Devin CLI); plans shared with Devin Desktop) are AI coding agents platforms, priced from $19/mo and $20/mo respectively. The bottom line, head-to-head facts, and true cost tiers follow.
Devin leads three use cases to two, with two ties. It wins Enterprise with SOC 2, a zero data retention option and SSO through Okta, Entra ID, SAML, OIDC and SCIM, though its self-serve plans may train by default. It wins Free Plans because it publishes limited free usage, and Terminal Workflows on the breadth of its surfaces, including a CLI that runs inside JetBrains IDEs. Cosine wins Beginners and VS Code on price and safety, at $19/mo with 4M credits and checkpoints. Local Models and Open Source are ties, since neither publishes the deciding facts.
Reviewed by vsref Editorialfacts verified Oct 3, 2026Methodology →
Devin is our pick for most teams. Start there, or weigh the use-case verdicts below.
If you sign up through links on this page, vsref may earn a commission; programs exist on both sides of most comparisons, and commissions never change verdicts. How we make money
Cosine vs Devin: head-to-head facts
Every row independently verified| Fact | ||
|---|---|---|
| How usage is metered | $ usage pool + per-tokenOct 2 | Time windows + $ usage poolOct 2 |
| What the free plan allows | n/a | "Limited Devin usage"Oct 2 |
| Cheapest paid plan (monthly) | $19Oct 3 | $20Oct 2 |
| Top individual plan | $19Oct 3 | $200Oct 2 |
| Usage included at entry tier | 4M Cosine Credits/monthOct 3 | n/a |
| Rate-limit window | monthly credit allocationOct 2 | Daily + weekly allowance (Pro, Teams full seat)Oct 2 |
| Bring your own API key | true (subscription login: ChatGPT, Claude Pro/Max/Team...Oct 2 | Partial: link ChatGPT Plus/Pro so GPT-model usage...Oct 2 |
| Models available | Cosine Lumen Outpost (post-trained from Kimi K2.6) +25 moreOct 2 | Model selector (self-serve token-cost table, dated...Oct 2 |
| Pick the model per task | ✓ YesOct 2 | ✓ YesOct 2 |
| Where it runs | CLI (cos), cloud (web), desktop appOct 2 | cloud (web app), CLI, desktop IDE (Devin Desktop) +4 moreOct 2 |
| Autonomous multi-file edits | ✓ YesOct 2 | ✓ YesOct 2 |
| Runs terminal commands | ✓ YesOct 2 | ✓ YesOct 2 |
| Background / cloud agents | ✓ YesOct 2 | ✓ YesOct 2 |
| Opens PRs from issues | n/a | ✓ YesOct 2 |
| MCP support | ✓ YesOct 2 | ✓ YesOct 2 |
| Trains on your code? | n/a | Self-serve: may train by defaultOct 2 |
| Zero data retention option | n/a | ✓ YesOct 2 |
| Self-hosted / VPC deployment | ✓ YesOct 2 | ✓ YesOct 2 |
Cosine vs Devin pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers
Real monthly cost at 3 developer profiles: hobbyist (~5 h/week), full-time developer (~25 h/week of daily agent use), team of 5. Most vendors do not publish how much usage a plan covers, so the full-time row spans the cheapest to the top individual plan unless the vendor publishes its own guidance for daily users. Bring-your-own-key and open-source agents show the model bill you pay the provider, never $0.Cosine vs Devin: verdicts by use case
Cosine gives newcomers a more predictable start. Its cheapest paid plan is $19/mo, while Devin's is $20/mo, and Cosine publishes what that buys: 4M Cosine Credits a month. Devin does not publish an entry allowance. Cosine also offers checkpoints and rollback for undoing a bad edit, which Devin does not publish. Devin's free plan offers only limited Devin usage, and Cosine does not publish a free plan. Both run as a CLI, in the cloud and on the desktop.
Devin has the stronger compliance record, with a caveat on training: its self-serve plans may train on code by default, and Cosine publishes no training policy at all. Both offer self-hosted deployment. Devin's SSO is spelled out for Enterprise with Okta, Entra ID, SAML, OIDC and SCIM, while Cosine's SSO is vendor claimed. Devin offers a zero data retention option, which Cosine does not publish, and Devin has SOC 2 while Cosine states it does not. Both list admin audit logs.
What a free tier allows matters most here, and only Devin publishes one, though it promises just limited Devin usage. Cosine does not publish a free plan. Cosine is stronger on bringing your own account: it supports subscription login with ChatGPT and Claude plans, while Devin's support is partial, linking ChatGPT Plus or Pro for GPT-model usage. Cosine's cheapest paid plan is $19/mo, while Devin's is $20/mo. Neither publishes local model support. Devin's free tier, however limited, gives it the edge.
Neither Cosine nor Devin publishes local model support, supported model providers or a license, so the facts that decide this use case are missing for both. Both let you pick the model per task. On bringing your own account, Cosine supports subscription logins such as ChatGPT and Claude plans, while Devin's support is partial, but that links hosted subscriptions rather than models on your own machine. Developers who need offline, on-device models cannot rely on either from what is published.
Neither Cosine nor Devin publishes a license, supported model providers, local model support, GitHub stars or a separate hosted option, so there is no basis for an open-source pick. Both are sold as paid products, with Cosine from $19/mo and Devin from $20/mo, and both offer self-hosted deployment as a product option rather than as source code. Teams that want to read or fork the agent itself should look elsewhere.
Both work from the shell: Cosine runs as a CLI called cos plus cloud and desktop apps, and Devin runs as a CLI, a cloud web app and Devin Desktop, plus four more surfaces. Both run terminal commands, offer background agents, support MCP and read project rules, with Cosine using AGENTS.md and Devin using scoped Knowledge notes. Devin's CLI also runs inside JetBrains IDEs. The wider range of places Devin runs gives it a slight edge.
Neither names VS Code as a supported editor: Devin's CLI runs inside JetBrains IDEs plus two more, and Cosine does not publish editor support. Both make autonomous multi-file edits and both index the codebase. Cosine pulls ahead on review and undo, offering checkpoints and rollback, which Devin does not publish, and it states 4M Cosine Credits a month at its entry tier. For an agent you can safely roll back, Cosine edges ahead, though VS Code users should confirm editor fit for both.
Cosine vs Devin: common questions
Is Cosine cheaper than Devin?+−
Yes, slightly at entry. Cosine's cheapest paid plan is $19/mo, while Devin's is $20/mo. Cosine's top individual plan is also $19/mo, while Devin's reaches $200/mo. For teams, Cosine's plan is $199/mo, while Devin charges $40/user/mo, so which is cheaper depends on team size.
Cosine vs Devin: which is better for beginners?+−
Cosine is the better start for most beginners. Its cheapest paid plan is $19/mo with 4M Cosine Credits a month, while Devin's is $20/mo without a published allowance. Cosine also offers checkpoints and rollback. Devin does have a free plan with limited Devin usage.
Does Cosine or Devin cost less for a team?+−
Cosine's team plan is $199/mo, while Devin's is $40/user/mo. Both also offer enterprise plans through sales.
Is Cosine or Devin better for enterprise compliance?+−
Devin lists SOC 2, a zero data retention option and enterprise SSO with Okta, Entra ID, SAML, OIDC and SCIM. Cosine states it does not have SOC 2, and its SSO is vendor claimed. Both offer self-hosted deployment and admin audit logs.
What is the top individual plan for Cosine vs Devin?+−
Cosine's top individual plan is $19/mo, while Devin's top individual plan is $200/mo.
How do Cosine and Devin handle usage beyond the plan?+−
Cosine sells add-on credits at $6.50 per million on Starter, with a monthly credit allocation. Devin uses prepaid on-demand credits that roll over and never expire, with a daily and weekly allowance on Pro and Teams.
Does Devin train on my code?+−
Devin's self-serve plans may train on code by default. It does offer a zero data retention option.
Which models does Cosine offer?+−
Cosine offers Cosine Lumen Outpost, post-trained from Kimi K2.6, plus 25 more models, and lets you pick the model per task.
Can Devin open pull requests from issues?+−
Yes. Devin opens PRs from issues, offers code review, and runs background and parallel agents.
Best Cosine alternatives →Best Devin alternatives →
When neither is right: weigh the rest of the AI coding agents field →
If you sign up through links on this page, vsref may earn a commission; programs exist on both sides of most comparisons, and commissions never change verdicts. How we make money