vsref

12 Best GitHub Copilot Alternatives (2026)

GitHub Copilot is github's ai coding assistant: completions, chat and agent mode in ides, plus a cli, a desktop app and a cloud agent that works on github issues and opens pull requests.. Teams that switch usually cite published usage limits instead of an unpublished allowance, an open-source agent you can run with your own API key, a no-training policy, SSO and a self-hosted option for company code. The alternatives below are ranked by published head-to-head verdicts, not sponsorship.

Not ready to switch? Full GitHub Copilot review →

If you sign up through links on this page, vsref may earn a commission; programs exist on both sides of most comparisons, and commissions never change verdicts. How we make money

Reviewed by vsref Editorialfacts verified Oct 3, 2026Methodology →

Where to switch, by reason

Switching because of published usage limits instead of an unpublished allowance →see Command Code
Switching because of an open-source agent you can run with your own API key →see DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
Switching because of a no-training policy, SSO and a self-hosted option for company code →see GitLab Duo Agent Platform
Switching because of free plans →see Amp
Switching because of terminal workflows →see Cline
Switching because of vs code →see Factory
Terminal-first coding agent included in Claude Pro/Max/Team/Enterprise plans or billed via API; also IDE extension, desktop app and cloud sessions (cloud_agent).vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.Best if you need: enterprise, terminal workflows
AI IDE with CLI and cloud agents; ships its own Grok/Composer models. Acquired by SpaceX (completed 2026-08-14, per cursor.com/blog/joining-spacex); also segments terminal_agent, cloud_agent.vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.Best if you need: enterprise, terminal workflows
Agentic AI IDE (ex-Windsurf) inside the Devin family; shares plans with Devin Cloud and Devin CLIvs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.Best if you need: enterprise
Coding agent across CLI (Apache-2.0), IDE extension, Codex Cloud (cloud_agent) and ChatGPT desktop app; usage shared with ChatGPT Work. The standalone Codex app merged into the ChatGPT desktop app on 2026-07-09.vs GitHub Copilot: adds self-hosted / vpc deployment.Best if you need: enterprise, free plans, local models, open source
JetBrains IDE agent, now also a terminal agent (Junie CLI) and runs in JetBrains Air; metered in JetBrains AI Credits ($1 each) with BYOK at provider rates, zero markup.Best if you need: enterprise, local models
Private, governed enterprise coding agent with self-hosted and air-gapped deployment. Now a Tricentis product (acquired 2026-07-30). Secondary segment: terminal_agent (Tabnine Plugin for OpenCode).vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.Best if you need: enterprise, terminal workflows
DevSecOps-native agents and flows for GitLab Premium/Ultimate; also IDE extensions (VS Code, JetBrains) and a Duo CLI; self-managed and air-gapped self-hosted-model options.vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.Best if you need: enterprise, terminal workflows
#8Tabby logoTabbyOSS
Self-hosted completion server + IDE plugins; low activity in 2026 (chat/knowledge features sunset Jan 2026, vendor focus shifted to its Pochi agent).vs GitHub Copilot: adds self-hosted / vpc deployment.Best if you need: enterprise, local models, open source
#9AiderOSS
Original git-native terminal pair programmer; BYO key only, no paid tier; publishes its own polyglot LLM leaderboard (also oss_self_hosted)vs GitHub Copilot: adds self-hosted / vpc deployment.
See pricingVisit Aider →
Legacy AWS coding assistant in end-of-sale; superseded by Kirovs GitHub Copilot: no pick the model per task.
#11Amp logoAmp
Frontier multi-model agent + cloud dev environments (orbs); also terminal_agent (Amp CLI, connects to VS Code/Cursor/Windsurf/Zed/Neovim). OWNERSHIP: no longer branded as Sourcegraph - operated by "Amp Frontier Corporation" (privacy policy, modified Sep 10, 2026); about page: "We are an independent agent research lab"; CLI npm package moved from @sourcegraph/amp to @ampcode/cli (May 14, 2026 changelog). Free Hobby tier with BYOK/ChatGPT-sub since Sep 13, 2026.vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.
See pricingVisit Amp →
Context-engine coding platform for large codebases; now led by Cosmos cloud agents + Auggie CLI (also ide_extension: VS Code, JetBrains, Vim/Neovim chat). Brief seeded it as an IDE extension; the 2026 pricing page leads with "Try Cosmos". Flat team pricing (up to 50 seats, no per-seat charge) with a pooled $ usage balance.vs GitHub Copilot: adds self-hosted / vpc deployment.
All 43 ai coding agents alternatives
#13Cline logoClineOSS
BYO-key OSS agent; free for individuals, pay only for inference; Plan/Act modes; also CLI, desktop app, SDK (also oss_self_hosted)vs GitHub Copilot: adds self-hosted / vpc deployment.
See pricingVisit Cline →
Coding agent for open models (DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, Qwen, MiniMax) with taste learning; CLI + desktop + ACP for Zed; cheap $1-$20 plans with published $ rolling windows.vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.
#15Continue logoContinueOSS
Discontinued: acquired by Cursor (June 2026); final v2.x release; code remains availablevs GitHub Copilot: no pick the model per task.
"The Sovereign AI Lab": coding agent + own post-trained Lumen models, pitched at regulated/air-gapped orgs and niche languages (COBOL, Fortran, Verilog). Formerly branded Genie (Genie CLI introduced Q2 2025). Secondary segment: terminal_agent (cos CLI).vs GitHub Copilot: adds self-hosted / vpc deployment.
See pricingVisit Cosine →
#17Crush logoCrushOSS
Source-available (FSL, converts to MIT after 2 years) BYO-model terminal agent; optional Charm-hosted 'Hyper' inference subscription.vs GitHub Copilot: no autonomous multi-file edits.
See pricingVisit Crush →
'Everything is a Plugin' (Cordis) agent harness from DeepSeek; developer preview with breaking changes; general-purpose, not coding-onlyvs GitHub Copilot: no pick the model per task.
Autonomous cloud coding agent + terminal agent (Devin CLI); plans shared with Devin Desktopvs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.
See pricingVisit Devin →
Agent-native dev platform; Droids work locally or as background/cloud agents. Secondary segment: terminal_agent (Droid CLI). Domain moved from factory.ai to factory.com (factory.ai 307-redirects).vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.
#21Freebuff logoFreebuffOSS
Ad-funded free coding agent on curated low-cost models. History: launched as Codebuff (YC); repo and operator (Freebuff, Inc., legal docs effective 2026-09-02) now present Freebuff, built on the Codebuff open multi-agent framework; codebuff.com still sells the premium-model Codebuff CLI ($100-$500/mo). Also desktop, web builder, cloud IDE.vs GitHub Copilot: no runs local models.
Open-source terminal agent (also oss_self_hosted), enterprise/API-key only after consumer users moved to Antigravity CLIvs GitHub Copilot: no runs local models.
Agent-first IDE + CLI + desktop agent manager; Google's consumer coding product since Gemini CLI's 2026-06-18 consumer cutovervs GitHub Copilot: no opens prs from issues.
#24Goose logoGooseOSS
Local, BYO-model general-purpose agent; also a native desktop app (Rust). Donated by Block to the Linux Foundation's Agentic AI Foundation in 2026.vs GitHub Copilot: no background / cloud agents.
See pricingVisit Goose →
#25gptme logogptmeOSS
MIT local-first terminal agent; also web UI, desktop app, REST server, MCP/ACP; persistent autonomous-agent template.vs GitHub Copilot: no opens prs from issues.
See pricingVisit gptme →
Subscription-bundled vendor terminal agent (SuperGrok / X Premium+), open-sourced Apache-2.0; also embeds in editors via ACPvs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.
Async GitHub cloud agent bundled with Google AI Pro/Ultra; changelog quiet since March 2026vs GitHub Copilot: no pick the model per task.
#28Kilo Code logoKilo CodeOSS
OSS multi-surface agent; zero-markup inference gateway + Kilo Pass credit bundles; started as a Roo Code fork, now built on the OpenCode core (also terminal_agent, cloud_agent)vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.
#29Kimi Code logoKimi CodeOSS
Open-weight model vendor's agent, included with Kimi membership; MIT CLI also takes other providersvs GitHub Copilot: no runs local models.
#30Kiro logoKiro
Spec-driven AI IDE + CLI (ex-Q Developer CLI) + web/cloud agent; AWS successor to Amazon Q Developervs GitHub Copilot: no runs local models.
See pricingVisit Kiro →
Persistent-memory coding agent (Apache-2.0); CLI + desktop + browser + Slack/Telegram/Discord channels; optional Letta Cloud ($20/mo Pro).vs GitHub Copilot: no autonomous multi-file edits.
European vendor agent with open-weight local models and self-hosting; also IDE extension and cloud_agent (remote agents, teleport)vs GitHub Copilot: adds self-hosted / vpc deployment.
#33OpenCode logoOpenCodeOSS
Most-starred OSS coding agent; provider-agnostic TUI with build/plan agents; optional pay-as-you-go Zen gateway and $10/$40 Go subscriptions (also oss_self_hosted)vs GitHub Copilot: adds self-hosted / vpc deployment.
#34OpenHands logoOpenHandsOSS
MIT-licensed, model-agnostic agent platform; self-host or use OpenHands Cloud (free individual SaaS, enterprise VPC). Also a cloud/async agent.vs GitHub Copilot: adds self-hosted / vpc deployment.
#35Pi logoPiOSS
Minimal-by-design harness: no built-in subagents, plan mode or permission popups; extend via packages, skills and SDKvs GitHub Copilot: no background / cloud agents.
See pricingVisit Pi →
#36PlandexOSS
Discontinued: Plandex Cloud wound down from 2025-10-03; no commits or releases since.vs GitHub Copilot: no pick the model per task.
#37Qwen Code logoQwen CodeOSS
Open-source multi-provider agent from an open-weight model lab; also desktop app, web UI and VS Code/JetBrains/Zed pluginsvs GitHub Copilot: no background / cloud agents.
#38Roo Code logoRoo CodeOSS
Discontinued 2026-05-15; team pivoted to Roomote (cloud agent). Community fork ZooCode; Kilo Code started as a Roo forkvs GitHub Copilot: no pick the model per task.
#39Trae logoTrae
Low-priced AI IDE (Free/Lite/Pro/Pro+/Ultra); product family now split into TraeCode (IDE) and TraeWork (web/desktop/mobile workspace built on SOLO). Owner per brief: ByteDance - the legal entity could not be read from a primary source (privacy policy/ToS are client-rendered); enterprise page cites Douyin as a customer. Chats may be used for training unless Privacy Mode is on.vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.
See pricingVisit Trae →
Plan-Code-Verify multi-model agent; desktop app (primary, most changelog activity), VS Code/JetBrains plugins, Slack/Telegram control; increasingly pitched as an 'AI technical cofounder' with app deployment.vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.
#41Void logoVoidOSS
Discontinued OSS Cursor alternative; repo archived 2026-06-02.vs GitHub Copilot: no pick the model per task.
See pricingVisit Void →
#42Warp logoWarp
Agentic terminal / ADE with credit-metered agents and cloud agent orchestration ("Warp Factories"). Secondary segment: cloud_agent. Client source available under AGPL-3.0.vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.
See pricingVisit Warp →
#43Zed logoZedOSS
Fast OSS editor with agentic features; free with your own keys or external agents, Pro $10/mo adds $5 of hosted-model tokens at list +10%. Also oss_self_hosted-adjacent (GPL editor, local models).vs GitHub Copilot: adds zero data retention option.
See pricingVisit Zed →

How the top GitHub Copilot alternatives compare

A closer look at the top 6: each GitHub Copilot alternative's standing among AI coding agents peers, its verdict record against GitHub Copilot, and the trade-offs of leaving.

1. Claude Code

Head-to-head, Claude Code takes enterprise and terminal workflows from GitHub Copilot.

Before switching, weigh what stays behind - GitHub Copilot vs Claude Code: adds runs local models.

Why teams switch: Claude Code covers more of an enterprise security checklist. On training, it states consumer plans (Free, Pro, Max) are user choice, while GitHub Copilot's listed policy only notes a change from 2026-04-24, so neither gives a blanket no-training promise here. The deciding gap is deployment: Claude Code offers a self-hosted or VPC option and GitHub Copilot does not. Claude Code also documents SSO on Team and Enterprise and a zero data retention option, neither of which Copilot publishes. Both list SOC 2 (Copilot's is vendor claimed) and admin audit logs. Enterprise verdict →

Overall verdict: GitHub Copilot takes five of seven use cases on price, a real free tier and editor reach. GitHub Copilot's cheapest paid plan is $10/mo, while Claude Code's is $20/mo, and Copilot's Pro tier includes 1,500 AI credits, which wins it Beginners. Its free plan includes 2,000 code completions a month, while Claude Code is not included on the Free plan, deciding Free Plans. It runs local models, which carries Local Models and Open Source, and it supports VS Code, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs and Eclipse. Claude Code still wins Enterprise, with self-hosted deployment that GitHub Copilot lacks, and Terminal Workflows thanks to its CLI-first design.

Full Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot comparison → · Claude Code review →

2. Cursor

Our use-case verdicts have Cursor ahead of GitHub Copilot for enterprise and terminal workflows.

Seen from the other side, GitHub Copilot vs Cursor: adds runs local models.

Why teams switch: What matters most to a security review is whether company code trains models and whether the agent can run in your own environment. Cursor states that with Privacy Mode on, code is not used for training, and it offers a self-hosted or VPC deployment; GitHub Copilot does not offer self-hosted deployment. Cursor also documents SAML/OIDC SSO on Teams ($40/user/mo) and above plus a zero data retention option, neither of which Copilot publishes. Both list SOC 2 and admin audit logs, though Copilot's are vendor claimed. Cursor leads on every heavy enterprise requirement. Enterprise verdict →

Overall verdict: GitHub Copilot wins five of seven use cases. Cursor's cheapest paid plan is $20/mo, while GitHub Copilot's is $10/mo, and Copilot publishes 1,000 base plus 500 flex credits on Pro and 2,000 code completions a month on its no-cost tier, which carries Beginners and Free Plans. Copilot's local model support decides Local Models and Open Source, and working directly in VS Code, Visual Studio and JetBrains IDEs wins VS Code. Cursor takes Enterprise, with self-hosted deployment, zero data retention and a no-training Privacy Mode, and Terminal Workflows, on its wider surface list.

Full Cursor vs GitHub Copilot comparison → · Cursor review →

3. Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf)

Our use-case verdicts have Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) ahead of GitHub Copilot for enterprise.

Seen from the other side, GitHub Copilot vs Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf): adds runs local models.

Why teams switch: Neither vendor's training policy, as published, settles the question on its own, so the deployment and control features decide it. Devin Desktop offers a self-hosted or VPC deployment, while GitHub Copilot does not. Devin Desktop also documents SAML/OIDC SSO with SCIM on Enterprise and a zero data retention option, neither of which Copilot publishes. Both list SOC 2 and admin audit logs, but Copilot's are vendor claimed while Devin Desktop's are verified. For a security review, that combination clearly favors Devin Desktop. Enterprise verdict →

Overall verdict: GitHub Copilot wins six of seven use cases. Devin Desktop's cheapest paid plan is $20/mo, while GitHub Copilot's is $10/mo, and Copilot publishes 1,000 base plus 500 flex credits on Pro and 2,000 code completions a month on its no-cost tier, which carries Beginners and Free Plans. Local model support and bring-your-own-key, which Devin Desktop lacks on self-serve plans, win Local Models and Open Source. Wider surfaces and direct VS Code support take Terminal Workflows and VS Code. Devin Desktop keeps Enterprise with self-hosted deployment, SSO with SCIM and zero data retention.

Full Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) vs GitHub Copilot comparison → · Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) review →

4. OpenAI Codex

Head-to-head, OpenAI Codex takes enterprise, free plans, local models and open source from GitHub Copilot.

Before switching, weigh what stays behind - GitHub Copilot vs OpenAI Codex: no self-hosted / vpc deployment.

Why teams switch: Neither vendor publishes a crisp training statement: GitHub Copilot's policy note reads "From 2026-04-24" and OpenAI Codex's reads "Business". The next deciding factor is deployment, and here they split: Codex lists a self-hosted or VPC option (vendor claimed), while Copilot says no. Codex also publishes SAML SSO and MFA on Business, which Copilot does not list. Both report SOC 2 and admin audit logs, and neither publishes a zero data retention option. Enterprise verdict →

Full OpenAI Codex vs GitHub Copilot comparison → · OpenAI Codex review →

5. JetBrains Junie

In our published verdicts, JetBrains Junie beats GitHub Copilot for enterprise and local models and matches it for open source.

Why teams switch: Training policy matters most to a security review, and JetBrains Junie gives the clearer answer: no training on inputs or outputs unless expressly agreed. GitHub Copilot's listed policy only notes a change from 2026-04-24, without a stated commitment. GitHub Copilot does not offer self-hosted or VPC deployment, and JetBrains Junie does not publish one either. Neither publishes SSO or a zero data retention option. Both list SOC 2, with GitHub Copilot's vendor claimed and JetBrains Junie's verified, and GitHub Copilot claims admin audit logs. The training commitment tips it to JetBrains Junie. Enterprise verdict →

Full JetBrains Junie vs GitHub Copilot comparison → · JetBrains Junie review →

6. Tabnine

Head-to-head, Tabnine takes enterprise and terminal workflows from GitHub Copilot and matches it for local models and open source.

Before switching, weigh what stays behind - GitHub Copilot vs Tabnine: adds background / cloud agents.

Why teams switch: Training on company code is the deciding factor for enterprise buyers. Tabnine states a no-train-no-retain policy, while GitHub Copilot's policy note only reads "From 2026-04-24". Tabnine also offers a self-hosted or VPC deployment, which Copilot says it does not. Tabnine publishes SSO through SAML or OAuth 2.0 / OpenID Connect and a zero data retention option, neither of which Copilot lists. Both report SOC 2 and admin audit logs. Enterprise verdict →

Full Tabnine vs GitHub Copilot comparison → · Tabnine review →