# Vapi vs Vocode

> Vapi vs Vocode: Vapi is our pick, leading for agencies and ecommerce. Base rates $0.05 vs $0.00/min. They split on white-label / sub-accounts for agencies and.

![Vapi logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/vapi.png) ![Vocode logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/vocode.png)

Both Voice AI platforms, Vapi (Dev-first API platform, full pipeline control) and Vocode (Open-source framework) go head to head here, priced from $0.05/min and $0 license (self-host) respectively. Start with the bottom line, then the verified fact table and real production costs.

Voice AI platforms · 30 facts compared · all sourced · pricing verified Jul 15, 2026

## Bottom line

Vapi edges out Vocode on several concrete dimensions. Vapi offers a no-code agent builder (Vocode does not), partial white-label support versus none for Vocode, a testing suite, GDPR tooling, 60+ free minutes, and a broader native integration set including GHL, Zapier, Make, and Twilio. It also carries a $50M Series B as a credibility signal. Vocode wins on flexibility for pure developers but lacks the no-code builder and white-label support that most teams need, making Vapi the stronger overall pick for the widest range of buyers.

## Verdict summary

| Use case | Winner | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| No-code agency deploys | Vapi | For a no-code agency that needs to white-label and resell, Vapi offers a no-code agent builder while Vocode explicitly has no no-code builder. |
| Custom pipeline control | Vocode | Both tools are API-first, support BYO LLM and BYO voice, and offer native SIP trunking, making them closely matched for engineering pipeline control. |
| Ecommerce support and orders | Vapi | For ecommerce support, a no-code agent builder matters greatly for non-technical teams configuring order flows quickly. |
| Healthcare compliance | Tie | Both tools treat HIPAA BAA identically as a paid addon, per facts 2178c398 and ce817cc4. |
| Outbound sales campaigns | Vapi | Both tools support native outbound campaigns and warm transfer to human agents. |
| SMB receptionist and booking | Vapi | Vapi wins decisively for an SMB receptionist and booking use case. |

## Vapi vs Vocode: head-to-head facts

| Fact | Vapi | Vocode | Verified |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Base price / min | ~$0.05 ([source](https://vapi.ai/pricing)) | $0.00 ([source](https://www.startuphub.ai/startups/vocode)) | Jul 15 |
| Real production cost / min | ~$0.05-0.17 ([source](https://vapi.ai/pricing)) | n/a | Jul 15 |
| HIPAA BAA on base plan | ◑  Paid add-on ([source](https://vapi.ai/pricing)) | ◑  Paid add-on ([source](https://docs.vocode.dev/welcome)) | Jul 15 |
| Native SIP trunking | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.vapi.ai/quickstart/introduction)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.vocode.dev/welcome)) | Jul 15 |
| Concurrency limit (base) | ~10 calls ([source](https://vapi.ai/pricing)) | n/a | Jul 15 |
| Median e2e latency | ~600 ms ([source](https://docs.vapi.ai/quickstart/introduction)) | n/a | Jul 15 |
| Bring-your-own LLM | ✓  Yes ([source](https://vapi.ai/pricing)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://github.com/vocodedev)) | Jul 15 |
| Free tier credit | 60+ minutes included ([source](https://vapi.ai/pricing)) | n/a | Jul 15 |

## Vapi vs Vocode pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers

All-in monthly: platform fee + per-minute + telephony. Assumes GPT-4o class model, ElevenLabs voice.

| Volume | Buyer | Vapi | Vocode | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1K min/mo | Solo builder | $110 | $0 | Includes estimated telephony. Free credits can offset the first month. |
| 10K min/mo | Agency | $1,100 | $0 | Volume pricing typically starts to apply at this tier. |
| 100K min/mo | Call center | $11,000 | $0 | Both platforms offer custom contracts at this tier. Negotiate. |

## Vapi vs Vocode: verdicts by use case

### No-code agency deploys → Vapi

For a no-code agency that needs to white-label and resell, Vapi offers a no-code agent builder while Vocode explicitly has no no-code builder. On white-labeling, Vapi provides partial support while Vocode has none. Both dimensions directly relevant to this use case point to Vapi, making it the clear winner.

### Custom pipeline control → Vocode

Both tools are API-first, support BYO LLM and BYO voice, and offer native SIP trunking, making them closely matched for engineering pipeline control. However, Vocode has a $0.00/min base price versus Vapi at $0.05/min rising to $0.17/min real cost, which lowers friction for experimentation in custom pipelines. Vocode also lacks a no-code builder (fact b235d200), signaling a purely code-first orientation that aligns with engineering teams building custom pipelines rather than a hybrid product.

### Ecommerce support and orders → Vapi

For ecommerce support, a no-code agent builder matters greatly for non-technical teams configuring order flows quickly. Vapi offers a no-code builder while Vocode does not (facts 450d1060, b235d200). Vapi also provides a broader native integration set, including Zapier and Make for connecting to ecommerce backends (fact 70764157), plus a testing suite (fact 024b391e) to validate order flows. Both tools share warm transfer, outbound campaigns, and BYO LLM. Vocode's estimated $0.00 base price is offset by lower confidence and fewer builder tools, giving Vapi a narrow edge for practical ecommerce deployment.

### Healthcare compliance → Tie

Both tools treat HIPAA BAA identically as a paid addon, per facts 2178c398 and ce817cc4. Neither has a compliance edge over the other for HIPAA-bound workflows based on available facts. Vapi has GDPR tooling and SOC 2 listed as no, but no SOC 2 or equivalent compliance signal exists for Vocode either, so neither stands out decisively for healthcare compliance requirements.

### Outbound sales campaigns → Vapi

Both tools support native outbound campaigns and warm transfer to human agents. Vapi edges ahead on several factors relevant to outbound sales operations: it includes a no-code agent builder (Vocode does not, per fact b235d200), making it easier to spin up and iterate on campaign scripts without engineering. Vapi also offers partial white-label and sub-accounts (fact 7496ef62) versus none for Vocode (fact 474ef2b2), which is useful for agencies running multi-client outbound programs. Vapi's 10-call base concurrency, self-serve signup, and $50M Series B backing further reduce operational risk for production campaigns.

### SMB receptionist and booking → Vapi

Vapi wins decisively for an SMB receptionist and booking use case. It offers a no-code agent builder that Vocode lacks, making setup accessible to non-technical SMB owners. Vapi also includes 60+ free minutes to start, a self-serve signup, native integrations with Google Calendar and Zapier for booking workflows, and a built-in testing suite. Vocode has no no-code builder, making it harder to deploy without developers. For a time-sensitive, budget-conscious SMB, Vapi's turnkey tooling is a clear advantage.

## Vapi vs Vocode: common questions

### Which is cheaper Vapi or Vocode per minute of voice calls

Vocode lists a base price of $0.00/min, though that figure is estimated rather than vendor confirmed. Vapi charges $0.05/min as its stated base, with real production costs ranging from $0.05 to $0.17/min once LLM and TTS usage is included. On Vapi, LLM and TTS costs are passed through at cost.

### Does Vapi or Vocode offer a no-code agent builder for non-developers

Vapi offers a no-code agent builder, while Vocode does not. Both platforms are API-first, but teams without engineering resources will find Vapi more accessible out of the box.

### Is HIPAA compliance available on Vapi and Vocode

Both Vapi and Vocode offer HIPAA BAA coverage as a paid add-on, not included in their base plans. Neither platform provides it for free, so healthcare teams should budget for that additional cost regardless of which platform they choose.

### Can I bring my own LLM and TTS voice to Vapi or Vocode

Both Vapi and Vocode support bring-your-own LLM and bring-your-own TTS voice. This gives teams full flexibility to use their preferred model providers without being locked into a single vendor on either platform.

### What is the call latency on Vapi

Vapi reports a median end-to-end latency of 600 ms according to vendor claims. No comparable latency figure for Vocode is available in the provided facts.

### Does Vapi have a free tier and what does it include

Vapi includes 60 or more free minutes on signup with no monthly platform fee. The base plan starts at $0/mo, making it easy to test before committing to paid usage.

### Which platform is better for agencies that need white-labeling or sub-accounts

Vapi offers partial white-label and sub-account support, which may suit some agency use cases. Vocode does not offer white-label or sub-account functionality. Based on available facts, neither platform provides full white-label coverage.

### What integrations does Vapi support compared to Vocode

Vapi natively integrates with GHL, Twilio, Telnyx, Slack, Google Calendar, Zapier, and Make. No native integration list is available for Vocode based on the provided facts. Both platforms are API-first, enabling custom integrations on either side.

Source: https://www.versusref.com/voice-ai/vapi-vs-vocode/