# Bland AI vs Dasha

> Bland AI vs Dasha: Bland AI for agencies, Dasha for developers. Base rates $0.14 vs $0.08/min. They split on founded year + hq and base price / min. Verified.

![Bland AI logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/bland.png) ![Dasha logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/dasha.png)

Both Voice AI platforms, Bland AI (Outbound-heavy, enterprise-leaning) and Dasha (Dev platform, conversational AI) go head to head here, priced from $0.14/min and $0.08/min respectively. Start with the bottom line, then the verified fact table and real production costs.

Voice AI platforms · 30 facts compared · all sourced · pricing verified Jul 15, 2026

## Bottom line

Bland AI wins for teams needing higher base concurrency (10 vs 1 call), native SIP trunking, outbound campaigns, a no-code builder, warm transfer, and SOC2 compliance at no platform fee. Dasha wins for cost-sensitive teams: its real cost is flat at $0.08/min versus Bland AI's $0.11 to $0.14/min, and it offers 1,000 free minutes versus Bland AI's minimal credit. Different teams, different winners.

## Verdict summary

| Use case | Winner | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| No-code agency deploys | Bland AI | Neither tool offers white-label sub-accounts. |
| Custom pipeline control | Dasha | Both tools are API-first and support full lifecycle control via API. |
| Ecommerce support and orders | Bland AI | For ecommerce support and order flows, Bland AI offers native outbound campaigns, warm transfer to human, a built-in knowledge base, a no-code agent builder, DTMF/IVR navigation, and 10 concurrent calls on its base plan, compared to Dasha's 1 concurrent call. |
| Healthcare compliance | Tie | HIPAA-bound healthcare workflows require a HIPAA BAA. |
| Outbound sales campaigns | Bland AI | Bland AI offers native outbound campaigns (fact 3bf81179), warm transfer to human agents (436dfcde), a base concurrency of 10 calls versus Dasha's 1 call (ab3a0fe1 vs 7dac60ee), a no-code agent builder (2618ade6), and a built-in knowledge base (254d9b27). |
| SMB receptionist and booking | Bland AI | For an SMB receptionist and booking use case, Bland AI offers 10 concurrent calls on the base plan versus Dasha's 1 call, making it far more suitable for handling multiple simultaneous inbound inquiries. |

## Bland AI vs Dasha: head-to-head facts

| Fact | Bland AI | Dasha | Verified |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Base price / min | ~$0.14 ([source](https://www.bland.ai/pricing)) | ~$0.08 ([source](https://dasha.ai/pricing)) | Jul 15 |
| Real production cost / min | $0.11-0.14 ([source](https://www.bland.ai/pricing)) | $0.08-0.08 ([source](https://dasha.ai/pricing)) | Jul 15 |
| HIPAA BAA on base plan | ◑  Enterprise only ([source](https://www.bland.ai/pricing)) | n/a | Jul 15 |
| Native SIP trunking | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.bland.ai/pricing)) | n/a | Jul 15 |
| Concurrency limit (base) | ~10 calls ([source](https://www.bland.ai/pricing)) | ~1 calls ([source](https://dasha.ai/pricing)) | Jul 15 |
| Median e2e latency | 1,000 ms ([source](https://www.bland.ai/ai-information)) | n/a | Jul 15 |
| Free tier credit | 2 credits + inbound number ($15/mo value) ([source](https://www.bland.ai/pricing)) | 1,000 free minutes ([source](https://dasha.ai/pricing)) | Jul 15 |

## Bland AI vs Dasha pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers

All-in monthly: platform fee + per-minute + telephony. Assumes GPT-4o class model, ElevenLabs voice.

| Volume | Buyer | Bland AI | Dasha | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1K min/mo | Solo builder | $125 | $80 | Includes estimated telephony. Free credits can offset the first month. |
| 10K min/mo | Agency | $1,250 | $800 | Volume pricing typically starts to apply at this tier. |
| 100K min/mo | Call center | $12,500 | $8,000 | Both platforms offer custom contracts at this tier. Negotiate. |

## Bland AI vs Dasha: verdicts by use case

### No-code agency deploys → Bland AI

Neither tool offers white-label sub-accounts. Bland AI explicitly lacks white-label support (fact 53004a40), and no white-label fact exists for Dasha either. For no-code deployment, Bland AI has a confirmed no-code agent builder (fact 2618ade6), a $0/mo platform fee (fact dd0ec5e0), self-serve signup, and 10 concurrent calls on the base plan (fact ab3a0fe1), versus Dasha's 1 concurrent call at base (fact 7dac60ee-6085). Bland AI is narrowly better for the no-code deployment side of the use case, but neither tool satisfies the white-label resale requirement.

### Custom pipeline control → Dasha

Both tools are API-first and support full lifecycle control via API. However, Dasha's real production cost is a flat $0.08/min versus Bland AI's $0.11-0.14/min range, meaning engineering teams running high-volume custom pipelines pay materially less with Dasha. Dasha also charges $0/mo for extra concurrent lines beyond its base, removing a scaling constraint that matters when teams spin up parallel pipeline branches. Bland AI's 10-call base concurrency is higher out of the box, but Dasha's zero marginal concurrency cost better fits programmable, burst-heavy custom pipelines.

### Ecommerce support and orders → Bland AI

For ecommerce support and order flows, Bland AI offers native outbound campaigns, warm transfer to human, a built-in knowledge base, a no-code agent builder, DTMF/IVR navigation, and 10 concurrent calls on its base plan, compared to Dasha's 1 concurrent call. These features directly serve ecommerce scenarios like order status, escalations, and campaigns. Dasha's flat $0.08/min rate is cheaper than Bland AI's $0.11 to $0.14/min range, so cost favors Dasha, but the breadth of ecommerce-relevant features included in Bland AI's base plan tips the decision toward Bland AI.

### Healthcare compliance → Tie

HIPAA-bound healthcare workflows require a HIPAA BAA. Bland AI restricts its HIPAA BAA to enterprise plans only (per fact e6546286), leaving no compliance path on base plans. Dasha has no fact confirming HIPAA BAA availability at any tier. Since neither tool is confirmed to provide a HIPAA BAA on accessible plans, no confident winner can be declared. Without evidence that either meets the core compliance requirement, a tie is the only defensible call.

### Outbound sales campaigns → Bland AI

Bland AI offers native outbound campaigns (fact 3bf81179), warm transfer to human agents (436dfcde), a base concurrency of 10 calls versus Dasha's 1 call (ab3a0fe1 vs 7dac60ee), a no-code agent builder (2618ade6), and a built-in knowledge base (254d9b27). For outbound sales at volume, a starting concurrency of 10 is decisive compared to 1. Dasha's lower per-minute rate ($0.08 vs $0.14) is a consideration, but its lack of native campaign tooling and single-call base concurrency make it far less suited for outbound call-center operations.

### SMB receptionist and booking → Bland AI

For an SMB receptionist and booking use case, Bland AI offers 10 concurrent calls on the base plan versus Dasha's 1 call, making it far more suitable for handling multiple simultaneous inbound inquiries. Bland AI also includes warm transfer to human, a built-in knowledge base, no-code agent builder, native outbound campaigns, and a $0/mo platform fee. Although Dasha is cheaper at $0.08/min versus Bland AI's $0.11-0.14/min real cost, the 10x concurrency advantage and richer out-of-the-box SMB features tip the decision to Bland AI.

## Bland AI vs Dasha: common questions

### Which is cheaper per minute, Bland AI or Dasha?

Dasha has a lower base price at $0.08/min compared to Bland AI at $0.14/min. Real production cost estimates align with this: Dasha holds steady at $0.08/min while Bland AI ranges from $0.11 to $0.14/min. For telephony, Dasha charges an additional $0.08/min while Bland AI charges $0.00/min.

### Which tool offers a better free trial, Bland AI or Dasha?

Dasha offers 1,000 free minutes, making it the more generous starting point for volume testing. Bland AI provides 2 credits plus a free inbound number valued at $15 per month. Both platforms support self-serve signup with no sales call required.

### How many concurrent calls can I run on the base plan?

Bland AI includes 10 concurrent calls on its base plan. Dasha includes only 1 concurrent call on its base plan, though Dasha charges $0/mo for extra concurrent lines. Teams expecting high call volume out of the box may find Bland AI's base concurrency more practical.

### Is Bland AI or Dasha HIPAA compliant?

Bland AI offers a HIPAA BAA, but only on enterprise plans, not on standard tiers. Healthcare teams using Bland AI must upgrade to an enterprise plan to obtain the BAA. No HIPAA information is available for Dasha in the provided facts.

### Does Bland AI support SIP trunking and native phone number provisioning?

Bland AI supports native SIP trunking and allows users to buy or port numbers directly within the platform. It also integrates with Twilio and SIP trunks. No equivalent SIP trunking information is available for Dasha in the provided data.

### Which platform is better for non-technical users who need a no-code builder?

Bland AI offers a no-code agent builder and a built-in knowledge base, making it accessible to non-technical users. Both tools are API-first for engineering teams. No information about a no-code builder is available for Dasha.

### What uptime and support guarantees do Bland AI and Dasha offer?

Bland AI provides a 99.9% uptime SLA across all plans. Dasha offers email support, with priority support available through a private channel. For production deployments, Bland AI's broad SLA commitment may be an important consideration.

### Do Bland AI or Dasha require an annual contract to get their best pricing?

Bland AI requires no annual contract for its best pricing and charges a $0 per month platform fee. No information about annual contract requirements is available for Dasha. Bland AI's pay-as-you-go structure may suit teams that want pricing flexibility.

Source: https://www.versusref.com/voice-ai/bland-vs-dasha/