# Bluedot vs Jamie

> Bluedot vs Jamie: Bluedot is our pick, leading for consultants & agencies and engineering teams. They split on free tier transcription quota and business/team.

Both AI meeting notetakers platforms, Bluedot (Bot-free AI meeting notetaker) and Jamie (Bot-free, privacy-first EU meeting notes) go head to head here, priced from $14/seat/mo and $21/seat/mo respectively. Start with the bottom line, then the verified fact table and real production costs.

AI meeting notetakers platforms · 33 facts compared · all sourced · pricing verified Jul 20, 2026

## Bottom line

Bluedot wins the overall bottom line by a narrow four to three record. Bluedot's annual seat price is $14/seat/mo, well under Jamie's annual seat price of $21/seat/mo, a gap behind its wins for consultants, engineering, and privacy. Bluedot also holds SOC 2 Type II certification, which Jamie lacks, and confirms video recording, while Jamie confirms no video recording, deciding product and UX research. Jamie counters on CRM breadth: Jamie's CRM integrations list five named tools against Bluedot's CRM integrations, which list only two, and that reach is why Jamie wins recruiters, sales teams, and solo and free.

## Verdict summary

| Use case | Winner | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Consultants & Agencies | Bluedot | Low per seat cost is what decides this for a client facing team billing across many accounts, and Bluedot's annual rate of $14/seat/mo undercuts Jamie's $21/seat/mo by a wide margin. |
| Engineering Teams | Bluedot | An async engineering team wants standups to land in Slack, Notion, or Jira hands off. |
| Privacy & Compliance | Bluedot | Jamie states plainly that it does not offer a HIPAA BAA, ruling it out for legal and healthcare teams where that is non negotiable. |
| Product & UX Research | Bluedot | Jamie confirms it has no clips or highlight reels and no video recording, which rules it out for researchers who need to pull moments from interviews and review them visually. |
| Recruiters | Jamie | Both tools deliver an AI meeting summary and speaker identification, so clean, speaker labelled candidate notes come standard either way. |
| Sales Teams | Jamie | CRM sync is what matters most here, and Jamie's CRM integrations include five named tools, HubSpot, Salesforce, Attio, Pipedrive, and Dynamics 365, while Bluedot's CRM integrations list only two, Salesforce and HubSpot. |
| Solo & Free | Jamie | Jamie's free tier renews every month, 10 meetings at 30 minutes each, so a solo user gets a fresh allowance indefinitely. |

## Bluedot vs Jamie: head-to-head facts

| Fact | Bluedot | Jamie | Verified |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Price per seat (billed monthly) | 18 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/pricing)) | 25 $/seat/mo ([source](https://docs.meetjamie.ai/billing-pricing/subscriptions-plans)) | Jul 20 |
| Price per seat (billed annually) | 14 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/pricing)) | 21 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.meetjamie.ai/pricing)) | Jul 20 |
| What the free tier caps | 5 meetings lifetime, 1 hr/meeting ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/pricing)) | 10 meetings/mo, 30 min/meeting ([source](https://www.meetjamie.ai/pricing)) | Jul 20 |
| Capture method | bot_free ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/tools/meeting-recorder)) | bot_free ([source](https://www.meetjamie.ai/)) | Jul 20 |
| Bot-free capture option | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.meetjamie.ai/)) | Jul 20 |
| Meeting platforms supported | Zoom, Meet, Teams, Webex ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/)) | Zoom, Teams, Google Meet, any platform, in-person ([source](https://www.meetjamie.ai/)) | Jul 20 |
| Languages supported | 100 ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/tools/meeting-transcription)) | ~100 ([source](https://www.meetjamie.ai/blog/llm-info)) | Jul 20 |
| AI meeting summary | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.meetjamie.ai/blog/llm-info)) | Jul 20 |
| SOC 2 Type II | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/security)) | ✗  No ([source](https://www.meetjamie.ai/security)) | Jul 20 |

## Bluedot vs Jamie pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers

Real monthly bill for a team, from published per-seat rates on annual billing. Free-only or platform-bundled tools show n/a; their free-tier cap is the story.

| Volume | Buyer | Bluedot | Jamie | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 seat | Solo / freelancer | $14/mo | $21/mo | A single user. Free tiers often cover this entirely. |
| 10 seats | Growing team | $140/mo | $210/mo | A whole team on paid seats; annual billing assumed. |
| 50 seats | Department | $700/mo | $1,050/mo | Company rollout. Most vendors negotiate at this size. |

## Bluedot vs Jamie: verdicts by use case

### Consultants & Agencies → Bluedot

Low per seat cost is what decides this for a client facing team billing across many accounts, and Bluedot's annual rate of $14/seat/mo undercuts Jamie's $21/seat/mo by a wide margin. Both tools support in person and mobile capture and both offer bot free capture, so those needs are covered either way. Recording storage is unlimited on both. Jamie does publish a richer transcript export, PDF, copy paste, and CRM or Notion sync, while Bluedot's export formats are not documented, a small point in Jamie's favor. That is not enough to offset the seat price gap for an agency scaling across accounts.

### Engineering Teams → Bluedot

An async engineering team wants standups to land in Slack, Notion, or Jira hands off. Bluedot names Slack among its six integrations along with Notion, Zapier, Make, Google Drive, and MCP, while Jamie's six integrations cover Notion, Google Docs, OneNote, Asana, Make, and MCP but skip Slack entirely. Both tools generate automatic action items and both produce an AI meeting summary. Jamie does confirm a public API, which Bluedot's facts do not state, useful for teams building custom pipelines. Bluedot also publishes a $14/seat/mo annual rate against Jamie's $21/seat/mo. Slack coverage is what tips this in Bluedot's favor.

### Privacy & Compliance → Bluedot

Jamie states plainly that it does not offer a HIPAA BAA, ruling it out for legal and healthcare teams where that is non negotiable. Bluedot does not publish a HIPAA BAA fact either way, so it is not confirmed absent the way Jamie is. Both tools exclude customer data from AI training and both support GDPR and EU data residency, so that baseline holds for either vendor. Bluedot also holds SOC 2 Type II certification, while Jamie does not, adding another compliance point in Bluedot's favor. Retention controls are configurable on both, a wash. The missing BAA is the deciding gap.

### Product & UX Research → Bluedot

Jamie confirms it has no clips or highlight reels and no video recording, which rules it out for researchers who need to pull moments from interviews and review them visually. Bluedot confirms video recording, giving it the raw footage highlight clips would be built from, even though a dedicated highlight reel feature is not separately documented. Both tools offer an ask your meeting AI chat for querying across sessions. Jamie does publish a richer transcript export, PDF, copy paste, and CRM or Notion sync, a real plus for sharing findings, but that does not make up for lacking video entirely.

### Recruiters → Jamie

Both tools deliver an AI meeting summary and speaker identification, so clean, speaker labelled candidate notes come standard either way. The gap is in getting that data into an ATS: Jamie's transcript export includes PDF, copy paste, and direct CRM or Notion sync, while Bluedot does not publish a transcript export format at all. That makes Jamie the more concrete choice for a talent team moving notes into its systems. On price, Bluedot's annual seat rate is $14/seat/mo, cheaper than Jamie's annual seat rate of $21/seat/mo, and both list six key integrations. For recruiters, the confirmed export path into the ATS outweighs the price gap.

### Sales Teams → Jamie

CRM sync is what matters most here, and Jamie's CRM integrations include five named tools, HubSpot, Salesforce, Attio, Pipedrive, and Dynamics 365, while Bluedot's CRM integrations list only two, Salesforce and HubSpot. Both tools generate automatic action items, so next steps land either way. Jamie does have real gaps for a sales floor: it confirms no clips or highlight reels for coaching, and its own facts say no live, real time transcription during the call. On price, Bluedot's annual seat rate is $14/seat/mo, cheaper than Jamie's annual seat rate of $21/seat/mo. Even with those weaknesses, the much wider CRM reach is the deciding factor for reps who need every call synced.

### Solo & Free → Jamie

Jamie's free tier renews every month, 10 meetings at 30 minutes each, so a solo user gets a fresh allowance indefinitely. Bluedot's free tier is a hard lifetime cap of 5 meetings at 1 hour each, and once those are used it is gone for good. Over time Jamie's recurring quota adds up to more usable free transcription than Bluedot's one time allotment. Once someone needs a paid seat, Bluedot is cheaper at $18/seat/mo against Jamie's $25/seat/mo. Both include an AI meeting summary and both use bot free capture. For an individual who plans to stay on the free plan, Jamie's structure holds up better.

## Bluedot vs Jamie: common questions

### Is Bluedot cheaper than Jamie?

Yes. Bluedot's annual seat price is $14/seat/mo against Jamie's $21/seat/mo, and billed monthly Bluedot is $18/seat/mo against Jamie's $25/seat/mo. Bluedot is cheaper on every plan compared here.

### Bluedot vs Jamie: which is better for consultants & agencies?

Bluedot. Its annual seat price is $14/seat/mo against Jamie's $21/seat/mo, a wide gap for an agency billing across many client accounts. Both support in person and mobile capture and both offer bot free capture, and recording storage is unlimited on both, so those needs are covered either way.

### Does Bluedot or Jamie cost less for a team billed annually?

Bluedot is cheaper. Its annual plan runs $14/seat/mo compared with $21/seat/mo for Jamie. Billed monthly, Bluedot is also lower at $18/seat/mo against Jamie's $25/seat/mo.

### Is Bluedot or Jamie better for sales teams?

Jamie connects to five CRMs, HubSpot, Salesforce, Attio, Pipedrive, and Dynamics 365, against two for Bluedot, Salesforce and HubSpot. Jamie does confirm it has no clips or highlight reels and no live real time transcription, weaknesses Bluedot does not share, but the wider CRM reach still tips this to Jamie.

### Does Bluedot or Jamie offer a HIPAA BAA?

Jamie confirms it does not offer a HIPAA BAA. Bluedot does not publish a HIPAA BAA status either way. Both tools exclude customer data from AI training, so that part of the privacy picture holds for either vendor.

### Does Jamie have a public API?

Yes. Jamie publishes a public API. Bluedot's facts do not state whether it offers one.

### Can Bluedot record video during meetings?

Yes. Bluedot offers video recording. Jamie does not record video and also confirms it has no clips or highlight reels feature.

### How does Jamie's free plan work?

Jamie's free tier allows 10 meetings a month, each capped at 30 minutes, and this allowance renews monthly. That differs from a one time free allotment, since it keeps resetting for ongoing use.

Source: https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/bluedot-vs-jamie/