# Bluedot vs Granola

> Bluedot vs Granola: Bluedot is our pick, leading for consultants & agencies and engineering teams. They split on what the free tier caps and business/team plan.

Both AI meeting notetakers platforms, Bluedot (Bot-free AI meeting notetaker) and Granola (Bot-free AI meeting notepad) go head to head here, priced from $14/seat/mo and $14/seat/mo respectively. Start with the bottom line, then the verified fact table and real production costs.

AI meeting notetakers platforms · 33 facts compared · all sourced · pricing verified Jul 20, 2026

## Bottom line

Bluedot takes the overall lead with five use case wins to Granola's two. Its annual seat price of $14/seat/mo is published, and its recording storage keeps the actual audio on paid plans, unlike Granola, which stores notes but not the audio itself. Bluedot also has the edge on privacy, since Granola confirms it does not offer a HIPAA BAA, and on research use, since Granola confirms no video recording. Granola pulls ahead on price sensitive fits: it is cheaper at $14/seat/mo against Bluedot's $18/seat/mo billed monthly, which is why it wins for solo users and edges out Bluedot on sales teams through wider CRM reach.

## Verdict summary

| Use case | Winner | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Consultants & Agencies | Bluedot | Bluedot publishes a $14/seat/mo annual rate, the figure that matters most for agencies planning a client roster, while Granola's annual seat price is not published, only its $14/seat/mo monthly rate. |
| Engineering Teams | Bluedot | For getting standups into existing tools hands off, Bluedot names six integrations, Slack, Notion, Zapier, Make, Google Drive, and MCP, while Granola names four, Slack, Notion, Zapier, and MCP. |
| Privacy & Compliance | Bluedot | Granola states plainly that it does not offer a HIPAA BAA, which rules it out for legal and healthcare teams where that is non negotiable. |
| Product & UX Research | Bluedot | Granola confirms it has no clips or highlight reels and no video recording at all, which rules it out for researchers who need to pull moments from interviews and review them visually. |
| Recruiters | Bluedot | Both tools deliver an AI meeting summary and speaker identification, so clean, speaker labelled candidate notes come standard either way. |
| Sales Teams | Granola | CRM sync is what matters most here, and Granola connects to three CRMs, HubSpot, Attio, and Affinity, against two for Bluedot, Salesforce and HubSpot. |
| Solo & Free | Granola | Granola's free tier keeps the last 30 days of notes viewable on a rolling basis with no stated cap on meeting length, so a solo user can keep using it indefinitely. |

## Bluedot vs Granola: head-to-head facts

| Fact | Bluedot | Granola | Verified |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Price per seat (billed monthly) | 18 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/pricing)) | 14 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.granola.ai/pricing)) | Jul 20 |
| Price per seat (billed annually) | 14 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/pricing)) | n/a | Jul 20 |
| What the free tier caps | 5 meetings lifetime, 1 hr/meeting ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/pricing)) | Last 30 days of notes viewable ([source](https://docs.granola.ai/help-center/managing-your-account/subscriptions-and-billing)) | Jul 20 |
| Capture method | bot_free ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/tools/meeting-recorder)) | bot_free ([source](https://www.granola.ai/)) | Jul 20 |
| Bot-free capture option | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.granola.ai/)) | Jul 20 |
| Meeting platforms supported | Zoom, Meet, Teams, Webex ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/)) | Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, any app ([source](https://www.granola.ai/)) | Jul 20 |
| Languages supported | 100 ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/tools/meeting-transcription)) | 17 ([source](https://docs.granola.ai/help-center/customising-granola/multi-language)) | Jul 20 |
| AI meeting summary | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.granola.ai/)) | Jul 20 |
| SOC 2 Type II | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.bluedothq.com/security)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.granola.ai/security)) | Jul 20 |

## Bluedot vs Granola pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers

Real monthly bill for a team, from published per-seat rates on annual billing. Free-only or platform-bundled tools show n/a; their free-tier cap is the story.

| Volume | Buyer | Bluedot | Granola | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 seat | Solo / freelancer | $14/mo | $14/mo | A single user. Free tiers often cover this entirely. |
| 10 seats | Growing team | $140/mo | $140/mo | A whole team on paid seats; annual billing assumed. |
| 50 seats | Department | $700/mo | $700/mo | Company rollout. Most vendors negotiate at this size. |

## Bluedot vs Granola: verdicts by use case

### Consultants & Agencies → Bluedot

Bluedot publishes a $14/seat/mo annual rate, the figure that matters most for agencies planning a client roster, while Granola's annual seat price is not published, only its $14/seat/mo monthly rate. Both support in person and mobile capture and both offer bot free capture, so those needs are covered either way. Bluedot keeps unlimited recording storage on paid plans, while Granola stores unlimited notes but does not keep the audio itself, a real gap if an agency needs to replay a client call later. Granola's transcript export is also limited to a markdown copy with no PDF or DOCX, weaker for client deliverables.

### Engineering Teams → Bluedot

For getting standups into existing tools hands off, Bluedot names six integrations, Slack, Notion, Zapier, Make, Google Drive, and MCP, while Granola names four, Slack, Notion, Zapier, and MCP. Both cover the Slack and Notion path an engineering team needs, but Bluedot adds Google Drive and the Make automation layer on top. Both tools generate automatic action items and both produce an AI meeting summary. Granola does confirm a public API, which Bluedot's facts do not state, a point in its favor for teams that want to build custom tooling. Bluedot also publishes a $14/seat/mo annual rate that Granola does not.

### Privacy & Compliance → Bluedot

Granola states plainly that it does not offer a HIPAA BAA, which rules it out for legal and healthcare teams where that is non negotiable. Bluedot does not publish a HIPAA BAA fact either way, but it is not the one with a confirmed no. Both tools exclude customer data from AI training, both support GDPR and EU data residency, and both offer bot free capture, so those baseline needs are met by either vendor. On retention, Granola offers org wide auto deletion on its Enterprise plan while Bluedot's retention controls are configurable starting on its Business plan, a smaller difference that does not offset the missing BAA.

### Product & UX Research → Bluedot

Granola confirms it has no clips or highlight reels and no video recording at all, which rules it out for researchers who need to pull moments from interviews and review them visually. Bluedot confirms video recording, giving it the raw footage clips would come from, even though its highlight reel feature is not separately documented. Both tools offer an ask your meeting AI chat for querying across sessions. Bluedot also supports 100 languages against Granola's 17, useful for research panels that span regions. Granola's transcript export is markdown only, with no PDF or DOCX, a further limit for sharing findings.

### Recruiters → Bluedot

Both tools deliver an AI meeting summary and speaker identification, so clean, speaker labelled candidate notes come standard either way. The gap is in getting those notes into an ATS: Granola's transcript export is limited to a markdown copy with no PDF or DOCX option, while Bluedot does not publish a transcript export format at all, leaving it undocumented rather than confirmed limited. Bluedot publishes a $14/seat/mo annual rate, letting a talent team plan cost per hire, where Granola's annual seat price is not published. Bluedot's integration list is also broader, six named tools against Granola's four.

### Sales Teams → Granola

CRM sync is what matters most here, and Granola connects to three CRMs, HubSpot, Attio, and Affinity, against two for Bluedot, Salesforce and HubSpot. Granola also confirms live, real time transcription during the call, which Bluedot's facts do not state. Both tools generate automatic action items, so coaching notes land either way. Granola's real weakness is coaching clips: it confirms it has no clips or highlight reels, while Bluedot's clip feature is simply undocumented rather than confirmed absent. Bluedot publishes a $14/seat/mo annual rate that Granola does not. On balance, the wider CRM reach and confirmed live transcription edge this to Granola.

### Solo & Free → Granola

Granola's free tier keeps the last 30 days of notes viewable on a rolling basis with no stated cap on meeting length, so a solo user can keep using it indefinitely. Bluedot's free tier is a hard lifetime cap of 5 meetings at 1 hour each, after which it is done for good. Once someone outgrows the free tier, Granola is also the cheaper paid seat at $14/seat/mo against Bluedot's $18/seat/mo. Both tools include an AI meeting summary and both use bot free capture, so those needs are met either way. For an individual watching cost, Granola's tier structure and price both favor it.

## Bluedot vs Granola: common questions

### Is Bluedot cheaper than Granola?

Yes. Granola costs $14/seat/mo billed monthly, while Bluedot's monthly rate is $18/seat/mo. On the annual plan, Bluedot drops to $14/seat/mo, matching Granola's monthly price, but Granola's own annual seat price is not published for direct comparison.

### Bluedot vs Granola: which is better for consultants & agencies?

Bluedot. Its annual seat price of $14/seat/mo is published, matching Granola's disclosed monthly rate, while Granola's own annual price is not published. Bluedot also keeps unlimited recording storage including the audio itself, while Granola stores unlimited notes but not the audio, and its transcript export is markdown only with no PDF or DOCX, weaker for client deliverables.

### Is Bluedot or Granola better for privacy and compliance?

Bluedot is the safer pick for compliance heavy teams. Granola confirms it does not offer a HIPAA BAA, while Bluedot does not publish a HIPAA BAA status either way. Both exclude customer data from AI training and both support GDPR and EU data residency, so the general privacy baseline holds for either tool.

### Does Bluedot or Granola support more languages?

Bluedot supports 100 languages for transcription, far more than Granola's 17. For teams running meetings across many regions or languages, that gap is significant.

### Is Granola a good alternative to Bluedot for solo users on a budget?

Yes. Granola costs $14/seat/mo against Bluedot's $18/seat/mo, and its free tier keeps the last 30 days of notes viewable with no stated meeting length cap, while Bluedot's free tier is limited to 5 meetings total at 1 hour each.

### Does Bluedot integrate with Salesforce?

Yes. Bluedot's CRM integrations include Salesforce and HubSpot. Granola's CRM integrations are HubSpot, Attio, and Affinity, and do not include Salesforce.

### Can Granola record video, not just notes?

No. Granola does not record video, and its storage keeps unlimited notes but does not store the audio either. Bluedot does offer video recording on top of its notes and transcripts.

### What format can I export Granola transcripts in?

Granola only offers a markdown copy of the transcript, with no PDF or DOCX export option. Keep that in mind if you need a formatted file for sharing outside your team.

Source: https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/bluedot-vs-granola/