# Best AI meeting notetakers for Consultants & Agencies (2026)

> The best AI meeting notetakers platforms for consultants & agencies: Fellow leads, for client-facing teams billing against meetings across many accounts, where.

For consultants & agencies, **Fellow** is our pick (from $11/mo): Fellow runs $7/seat/mo on an annual plan, well below Fireflies.ai's $10/seat/mo, a real gap once billing scales across many client accounts. Client-facing teams billing against meetings across many accounts, where in-person capture and a low per-seat cost decide it. Below is the full ranking and the tradeoffs, or read [how we score](https://www.versusref.com/methodology/).

## What matters for consultants & agencies

Weight ×5 = decisive, ×1 = relevant.

| Fact | Weight | Fellow | Fireflies.ai | Otter.ai | Bluedot | Granola |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Price per seat (billed annually) | ×5 | 7 $/seat/mo (Jul 20) | 10 $/seat/mo (Jul 20) | 8.33 $/seat/mo (Jul 20) | 14 $/seat/mo (Jul 20) | n/a |
| Bot-free capture option | ×4 | ✓  Yes (Jul 20) | ✓  Yes (Jul 20) | ✓  Yes (Jul 20) | ✓  Yes (Jul 20) | ✓  Yes (Jul 20) |
| In-person / mobile capture | ×4 | ✓  Yes (Jul 20) | ✓  Yes (Jul 20) | ✓  Yes (Jul 20) | ✓  In-person via mobile app (Jul 20) | ✓  Yes (Jul 20) |
| Recording storage limit | ×3 | Team 1yr; Business annual+ unlimited (Jul 20) | 8,000 min/seat Pro; unlimited Business+ (Jul 20) | unlimited (paid) (Jul 20) | unlimited (paid plans) (Jul 20) | Unlimited notes; audio not stored (Jul 20) |
| Transcript export formats | ×2 | Word Doc, video, transcript, recap (Jul 20) | PDF, DOCX, SRT, CSV, JSON, MD (Jul 20) | TXT, DOCX, PDF, SRT (Jul 20) | n/a | Markdown copy only (no PDF/DOCX) (Jul 20) |

- ×5 **Price per seat (billed annually):** Small firms feel every seat; the annual per-seat rate is the difference between rolling it out and not.
- ×4 **Bot-free capture option:** A visible bot in a client call reads as intrusive; bot-free capture keeps the meeting professional.
- ×4 **In-person / mobile capture:** Consultants meet clients in the room, not only on Zoom; mobile/in-person capture covers the meetings that bill.
- ×3 **Recording storage limit:** Agencies accumulate a long archive across clients; storage caps decide what they can keep.
- ×2 **Transcript export formats:** Deliverables and billing records leave the tool as documents the client can keep.

## The ranking, tool by tool

| Rank | Tool | Verdict | Score | Price |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Fellow](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/fellow/) | Fellow runs $7/seat/mo on an annual plan, well below Fireflies.ai's $10/seat/mo, a real gap once billing scales across many client accounts. | 2 of 2 points · 1 matchup | From $11/mo |
| 2 | [Fireflies.ai](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/fireflies/) | Fireflies.ai costs $10/seat/mo on the annual plan versus $16/seat/mo for Fathom, a meaningful saving for agencies billing seats across many client accounts. | 28 of 34 points · 17 matchups | From $18/mo |
| 3 | [Otter.ai](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/otter-ai/) | Otter.ai's annual rate runs $8.33/seat/mo, well under Granola's only published rate of $14/seat/mo, and that gap matters when a consulting practice is billing seats across many client accounts. | 26 of 32 points · 16 matchups | From $16.99/mo |
| 4 | [Bluedot](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/bluedot/) | Low per seat cost is what decides this for a client facing team billing across many accounts, and Bluedot's annual rate of $14/seat/mo undercuts Jamie's $21/seat/mo by a wide margin. | 3 of 4 points · 2 matchups | From $18/mo |
| 5 | [Granola](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/granola/) | Granola's cheapest paid seat is $14/seat/mo billed monthly, well below Jamie's $21/seat/mo annual rate, its lowest published tier, a meaningful gap for agencies paying per seat across many client accounts. | 7 of 14 points · 7 matchups | From $14/mo |
| 6 | [Grain](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/grain/) | Grain's annual per-seat price is $15/seat/mo, well below tl;dv's $18/seat/mo, a real difference for agencies billing many small accounts. | 3 of 6 points · 3 matchups | From $19/mo |
| 7 | [Gemini in Google Meet (Take notes for me)](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/gemini-meet/) | For client-facing work billed against meetings across many accounts, both let you capture without a bot: Gemini in Google Meet costs $14/seat/mo on annual billing versus Zoom AI Companion at $14.16/seat/mo, so per-seat cost is close but favors Gemini in Google Meet. | 2 of 4 points · 2 matchups | From $16.80/mo |
| 8 | [Laxis](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/laxis/) | Laxis publishes an annual per-seat price of $12.79/seat/mo and unlimited paid storage, numbers Gong does not publish at all since it sells through custom contracts. | 2 of 4 points · 2 matchups | From $15.99/mo |
| 9 | [BrightHire](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/brighthire/) | Client-facing teams billing across many accounts often cannot have a visible recording bot in sensitive client meetings. | 1 of 2 points · 1 matchup | See pricing |
| 10 | [Notta](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/notta/) | For agencies watching per-seat costs across many accounts, the annual seat rate decides this first. | 1 of 2 points · 1 matchup | See pricing |
| 11 | [Avoma](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/avoma/) | Avoma offers a bot-free capture option and confirmed in-person and mobile capture, while Clari Copilot only supports bot-based capture with no bot-free option, a real gap for consultants who record client meetings in person as well as on video. | 3 of 8 points · 4 matchups | From $29/mo |
| 12 | [Gong](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/gong/) | Gong confirms in person and mobile capture plus a bot free capture option, both important for consultants moving between client sites and video calls. | 5 of 14 points · 7 matchups | See pricing |
| 13 | [Sybill](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/sybill/) | Sybill publishes an annual per-seat price of $30/seat/mo, while Gong does not disclose annual pricing, a clear win for cost-conscious consultants billing across many accounts. | 2 of 6 points · 3 matchups | From $36/mo |
| 14 | [Jiminny](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/jiminny/) | Jiminny confirms in person and mobile capture, letting client facing teams record onsite meetings the same way as video calls, and it publishes a clear seat price at $42/seat/mo, so agencies billing across many accounts can plan cost per client. | 1 of 4 points · 2 matchups | From $42/mo |
| 15 | [Sembly AI](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/sembly/) | Fireflies.ai and Sembly AI price the same on the annual per-seat plan, at $10/seat/mo each. | 1 of 4 points · 2 matchups | From $17/mo |
| 16 | [Fathom](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/fathom/) | Fathom's annual seat price is $16/seat/mo against tl;dv's $18/seat/mo, a real gap for an agency adding seats across client accounts. | 3 of 14 points · 7 matchups | From $20/mo |
| 17 | [Chorus by ZoomInfo](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/chorus-zoominfo/) | Client-facing teams that bill against meetings across many accounts often need to capture without a bot joining sensitive client calls. | 1 of 6 points · 3 matchups | See pricing |
| 18 | [Zoom AI Companion](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/zoom-ai-companion/) | Zoom AI Companion costs $14.16/seat/mo on an annual plan, versus $16/seat/mo for Fathom, a meaningful saving once billing scales across many client accounts. | 1 of 8 points · 4 matchups | From $16.99/mo |
| 19 | [Circleback](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/circleback/) | AI meeting notes + automations. | 0 of 2 points · 1 matchup | From $25/mo |
| 20 | [Clari Copilot](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/clari-copilot/) | Sales conversation intelligence (ex-Wingman). | 0 of 6 points · 3 matchups | See pricing |
| 21 | [Colibri.ai](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/colibri/) | Real-time conversation intelligence for sales. | 0 of 2 points · 1 matchup | From $20/mo |
| 22 | [Microsoft Copilot in Teams](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/copilot-teams/) | Native AI meeting recap for Microsoft Teams. | 0 of 2 points · 1 matchup | From $25.20/mo |
| 23 | [Jamie](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/jamie/) | Bot-free, privacy-first EU meeting notes. | 0 of 4 points · 2 matchups | From $25/mo |
| 24 | [Jump](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/jump/) | Vertical AI notetaker/co-pilot for wealth management: CRM-synced notes, pre-meeting prep, and follow-ups; SOC 2 Type II, 35,000+ advisors. | 0 of 2 points · 1 matchup | From $100/mo |
| 25 | [Krisp](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/krisp/) | Noise cancellation + AI meeting notes. | 0 of 2 points · 1 matchup | From $16/mo |
| 26 | [MeetGeek](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/meetgeek/) | AI meeting recorder & notetaker. | 0 of 2 points · 1 matchup | From $15.99/mo |
| 27 | [Metaview](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/metaview/) | Recruiting-vertical AI notetaker: captures interviews on Zoom/Meet/Teams/Webex and produces scorecard-ready, ATS-integrated candidate notes rather than generic meeting summaries. | 0 of 4 points · 2 matchups | From $100/mo |
| 28 | [Read AI](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/read-ai/) | AI meeting + email copilot. | 0 of 4 points · 2 matchups | From $19.75/mo |
| 29 | [Spinach](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/spinach/) | AI meeting notes / AI scrum master. | 0 of 2 points · 1 matchup | See pricing |
| 30 | [Supernormal](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/supernormal/) | Bot-free AI notetaker + agentic work. | 0 of 2 points · 1 matchup | From $20/mo |
| 31 | [Superpowered](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/superpowered/) | Privacy-first, bot-free meeting notes: no bots join calls, meetings are not recorded, audio is transcribed live and deleted immediately. | 0 of 2 points · 1 matchup | From $25/mo |
| 32 | [Tactiq](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/tactiq/) | Bot-free AI meeting notetaker. | 0 of 2 points · 1 matchup | From $12/mo |
| 33 | [tl;dv](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/tldv/) | AI meeting recorder and notetaker. | 0 of 8 points · 4 matchups | From $29/mo |
| 34 | [Wudpecker](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/wudpecker/) | Positions on customizable, template-driven meeting notes with both a joining bot and a botless desktop recorder, EU-hosted (GDPR). | 0 of 2 points · 1 matchup | From $19/mo |

### 1. Fellow

Fellow runs $7/seat/mo on an annual plan, well below Fireflies.ai's $10/seat/mo, a real gap once billing scales across many client accounts. [Full Fellow vs Fireflies.ai verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fellow-vs-fireflies/)

### 2. Fireflies.ai

Fireflies.ai costs $10/seat/mo on the annual plan versus $16/seat/mo for Fathom, a meaningful saving for agencies billing seats across many client accounts. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Fathom verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fathom-vs-fireflies/)

Fireflies.ai costs $10/seat/mo on its annual plan, well below Colibri.ai's $16/seat/mo, a meaningful gap when billing many client accounts. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Colibri.ai verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/colibri-vs-fireflies/)

Fireflies.ai is meaningfully cheaper on the annual per-seat price that matters most for billing across many client accounts, at $10/seat/mo versus $15/seat/mo for Read AI. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Read AI verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-read-ai/)

Fireflies.ai comes in cheaper on the annual per-seat price that matters most for a multi-account roster, at $10/seat/mo versus $12.79/seat/mo for Laxis. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Laxis verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-laxis/)

Billed annually, Fireflies.ai runs $10/seat/mo, undercutting even Granola's only published rate of $14/seat/mo, which matters most for agencies watching per seat cost across many client accounts. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Granola verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-granola/)

Billed annually, Fireflies.ai costs $10/seat/mo, and Jump does not publish an annual rate, only a flat $100/seat/mo, well above Fireflies.ai's monthly price of $18/seat/mo, which decides this for agencies watching per seat cost across many accounts. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Jump verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-jump/)

For client facing teams billing across many accounts, the annual per seat price is what decides it. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Grain verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-grain/)

For agencies billing across many accounts, the annual per seat rate is the deciding number: Fireflies.ai runs $10/seat/mo against Wudpecker's $15.2/seat/mo, a meaningful gap once a team scales past a couple of seats. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Wudpecker verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-wudpecker/)

For agencies billing across many accounts, the annual seat price carries the most weight, and Fireflies.ai's rate of $10/seat/mo beats Zoom AI Companion's $14.16/seat/mo. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Zoom AI Companion verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-zoom-ai-companion/)

Fireflies.ai publishes a clear annual rate of $10/seat/mo, while Gong does not publish a per seat price at all and requires contacting sales, making costs hard to plan across many client accounts. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Gong verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-gong/)

For consultants and agencies billing against many client meetings, a professional capture experience matters. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Spinach verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-spinach/)

For consultants and agencies watching per-seat costs, Fireflies.ai's annual price of $10/seat/mo is nearly half of tl;dv's $18/seat/mo, a meaningful gap when billing scales across client accounts. [Full Fireflies.ai vs tl;dv verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-tldv/)

For consultants and agencies watching per-seat costs across many client accounts, price is decisive. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Sybill verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-sybill/)

On annual billing Fireflies.ai costs $10 per seat per month against Avoma's $19, nearly half the price, a decisive saving for agencies staffing many seats across client accounts. [Full Fireflies.ai vs Avoma verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/avoma-vs-fireflies/)

### 3. Otter.ai

Otter.ai's annual rate runs $8.33/seat/mo, well under Granola's only published rate of $14/seat/mo, and that gap matters when a consulting practice is billing seats across many client accounts. [Full Otter.ai vs Granola verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/granola-vs-otter-ai/)

For agencies billing meetings across many client accounts, annual per seat cost matters most, and Otter.ai comes in at $8.33/seat/mo compared to $14.16/seat/mo for Zoom AI Companion, nearly half the price at scale. [Full Otter.ai vs Zoom AI Companion verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/otter-ai-vs-zoom-ai-companion/)

Otter.ai's annual per-seat price is $8.33/seat/mo, compared with $21/seat/mo for Microsoft Copilot in Teams, a large gap for agencies billing seats across many client accounts. [Full Otter.ai vs Microsoft Copilot in Teams verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/copilot-teams-vs-otter-ai/)

For a client-facing team billing across many accounts, seat cost is the biggest lever, and Otter.ai wins it decisively at $8.33/seat/mo on an annual plan against tl;dv's $18/seat/mo, more than double. [Full Otter.ai vs tl;dv verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/otter-ai-vs-tldv/)

Both tools keep annual seat pricing close, Otter.ai at $8.33/seat/mo against Tactiq's $8/seat/mo, so cost alone barely separates them. [Full Otter.ai vs Tactiq verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/otter-ai-vs-tactiq/)

Otter.ai wins on price: $8.33/seat/mo annually versus $10/seat/mo for Fireflies.ai, a real gap for agencies billing many seats across client accounts. [Full Otter.ai vs Fireflies.ai verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-otter-ai/)

Both Otter.ai and Sybill confirm they capture in-person and mobile meetings, and both offer a bot-free recording option, so those needs are met either way. [Full Otter.ai vs Sybill verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/otter-ai-vs-sybill/)

Otter.ai's cheapest paid plan runs $16.99/mo against Supernormal's $20/mo, a real saving for agencies watching seat costs across accounts. [Full Otter.ai vs Supernormal verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/otter-ai-vs-supernormal/)

Otter.ai's annual seat price is $8.33/seat/mo, below Sembly AI's $10/seat/mo, a real saving for agencies billing many seats across client accounts. [Full Otter.ai vs Sembly AI verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/otter-ai-vs-sembly/)

Otter.ai's annual seat price is $8.33/seat/mo, well below Read AI's $15/seat/mo, a major saving for agencies billing many seats across client accounts. [Full Otter.ai vs Read AI verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/otter-ai-vs-read-ai/)

The annual seat price decides this for agencies billing across many accounts: Otter.ai runs $8.33/seat/mo against Gemini in Google Meet (Take notes for me) at $14/seat/mo, a wide gap. [Full Otter.ai vs Gemini in Google Meet (Take notes for me) verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/gemini-meet-vs-otter-ai/)

For agencies billing across many client accounts, low seat cost and the ability to capture meetings in person decide this. [Full Otter.ai vs Metaview verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/metaview-vs-otter-ai/)

For agencies billing many accounts, the annual per-seat rate decides this. [Full Otter.ai vs MeetGeek verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/meetgeek-vs-otter-ai/)

Krisp's annual rate is $8/seat/mo and Otter.ai's is $8.33/seat/mo, close enough to call similar for a consulting practice pricing out seats across many client accounts. [Full Otter.ai vs Krisp verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/krisp-vs-otter-ai/)

Otter.ai's annual seat price runs $8.33/seat/mo, well under Fathom's $16/seat/mo, a large gap for an agency scaling seats across client accounts. [Full Otter.ai vs Fathom verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fathom-vs-otter-ai/)

### 4. Bluedot

Low per seat cost is what decides this for a client facing team billing across many accounts, and Bluedot's annual rate of $14/seat/mo undercuts Jamie's $21/seat/mo by a wide margin. [Full Bluedot vs Jamie verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/bluedot-vs-jamie/)

Bluedot publishes a $14/seat/mo annual rate, the figure that matters most for agencies planning a client roster, while Granola's annual seat price is not published, only its $14/seat/mo monthly rate. [Full Bluedot vs Granola verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/bluedot-vs-granola/)

### 5. Granola

Granola's cheapest paid seat is $14/seat/mo billed monthly, well below Jamie's $21/seat/mo annual rate, its lowest published tier, a meaningful gap for agencies paying per seat across many client accounts. [Full Granola vs Jamie verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/granola-vs-jamie/)

Granola's cheapest disclosed seat price is $14/seat/mo, still lower than Circleback's discounted annual rate of $20.83/seat/mo, which matters most for agencies billing seats across many client accounts. [Full Granola vs Circleback verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/circleback-vs-granola/)

Granola's only published seat rate is $14/seat/mo, while Superpowered's annual rate comes to $54/seat/mo, a wide gap for a consulting practice billing seats across many client accounts. [Full Granola vs Superpowered verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/granola-vs-superpowered/)

Granola's per seat pricing is $14/seat/mo, well under Fathom's annual rate of $16/seat/mo, and that gap matters most for agencies billing many seats across client accounts. [Full Granola vs Fathom verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fathom-vs-granola/)

### 6. Grain

Grain's annual per-seat price is $15/seat/mo, well below tl;dv's $18/seat/mo, a real difference for agencies billing many small accounts. [Full Grain vs tl;dv verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/grain-vs-tldv/)

Grain costs $15/seat/mo on the annual plan versus $16/seat/mo for Fathom, a modest edge for agencies billing seats across many client accounts. [Full Grain vs Fathom verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fathom-vs-grain/)

### 7. Gemini in Google Meet (Take notes for me)

For client-facing work billed against meetings across many accounts, both let you capture without a bot: Gemini in Google Meet costs $14/seat/mo on annual billing versus Zoom AI Companion at $14.16/seat/mo, so per-seat cost is close but favors Gemini in Google Meet. [Full Gemini in Google Meet (Take notes for me) vs Zoom AI Companion verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/gemini-meet-vs-zoom-ai-companion/)

### 8. Laxis

Laxis publishes an annual per-seat price of $12.79/seat/mo and unlimited paid storage, numbers Gong does not publish at all since it sells through custom contracts. [Full Laxis vs Gong verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/gong-vs-laxis/)

### 9. BrightHire

Client-facing teams billing across many accounts often cannot have a visible recording bot in sensitive client meetings. [Full BrightHire vs Metaview verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/brighthire-vs-metaview/)

### 10. Notta

For agencies watching per-seat costs across many accounts, the annual seat rate decides this first. [Full Notta vs Otter.ai verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/notta-vs-otter-ai/)

### 11. Avoma

Avoma offers a bot-free capture option and confirmed in-person and mobile capture, while Clari Copilot only supports bot-based capture with no bot-free option, a real gap for consultants who record client meetings in person as well as on video. [Full Avoma vs Clari Copilot verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/avoma-vs-clari-copilot/)

Low per seat cost decides this for agencies billing across many client accounts, and Avoma's annual plan runs $19/seat/mo, a published rate Gong does not disclose. [Full Avoma vs Gong verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/avoma-vs-gong/)

### 12. Gong

Gong confirms in person and mobile capture plus a bot free capture option, both important for consultants moving between client sites and video calls. [Full Gong vs Clari Copilot verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/clari-copilot-vs-gong/)

For consultants and agencies billing across many client accounts, bot-free capture matters because it avoids an obtrusive recording bot showing up in every client call. [Full Gong vs Jiminny verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/gong-vs-jiminny/)

For client-facing teams working across many accounts, in-person and mobile capture matters, and Gong confirms this: yes, with dedicated iOS and Android apps. [Full Gong vs Chorus by ZoomInfo verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/chorus-zoominfo-vs-gong/)

### 13. Sybill

Sybill publishes an annual per-seat price of $30/seat/mo, while Gong does not disclose annual pricing, a clear win for cost-conscious consultants billing across many accounts. [Full Sybill vs Gong verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/gong-vs-sybill/)

### 14. Jiminny

Jiminny confirms in person and mobile capture, letting client facing teams record onsite meetings the same way as video calls, and it publishes a clear seat price at $42/seat/mo, so agencies billing across many accounts can plan cost per client. [Full Jiminny vs Chorus by ZoomInfo verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/chorus-zoominfo-vs-jiminny/)

### 15. Sembly AI

Fireflies.ai and Sembly AI price the same on the annual per-seat plan, at $10/seat/mo each. [Full Sembly AI vs Fireflies.ai verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-sembly/)

### 16. Fathom

Fathom's annual seat price is $16/seat/mo against tl;dv's $18/seat/mo, a real gap for an agency adding seats across client accounts. [Full Fathom vs tl;dv verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fathom-vs-tldv/)

On annual billing Fathom runs $16 per seat per month against Avoma's $19, a real saving for agencies staffing many seats across client accounts. [Full Fathom vs Avoma verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/avoma-vs-fathom/)

### 17. Chorus by ZoomInfo

Client-facing teams that bill against meetings across many accounts often need to capture without a bot joining sensitive client calls. [Full Chorus by ZoomInfo vs Clari Copilot verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/chorus-zoominfo-vs-clari-copilot/)

### 18. Zoom AI Companion

Zoom AI Companion costs $14.16/seat/mo on an annual plan, versus $16/seat/mo for Fathom, a meaningful saving once billing scales across many client accounts. [Full Zoom AI Companion vs Fathom verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fathom-vs-zoom-ai-companion/)

### 19. Circleback

AI meeting notes + automations. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 20. Clari Copilot

Sales conversation intelligence (ex-Wingman). No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 21. Colibri.ai

Real-time conversation intelligence for sales. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 22. Microsoft Copilot in Teams

Native AI meeting recap for Microsoft Teams. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 23. Jamie

Bot-free, privacy-first EU meeting notes. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 24. Jump

Vertical AI notetaker/co-pilot for wealth management: CRM-synced notes, pre-meeting prep, and follow-ups; SOC 2 Type II, 35,000+ advisors. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 25. Krisp

Noise cancellation + AI meeting notes. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 26. MeetGeek

AI meeting recorder & notetaker. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 27. Metaview

Recruiting-vertical AI notetaker: captures interviews on Zoom/Meet/Teams/Webex and produces scorecard-ready, ATS-integrated candidate notes rather than generic meeting summaries. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 28. Read AI

AI meeting + email copilot. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 29. Spinach

AI meeting notes / AI scrum master. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 30. Supernormal

Bot-free AI notetaker + agentic work. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 31. Superpowered

Privacy-first, bot-free meeting notes: no bots join calls, meetings are not recorded, audio is transcribed live and deleted immediately. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 32. Tactiq

Bot-free AI meeting notetaker. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 33. tl;dv

AI meeting recorder and notetaker. No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

### 34. Wudpecker

Positions on customizable, template-driven meeting notes with both a joining bot and a botless desktop recorder, EU-hosted (GDPR). No won verdicts for this use case yet; it ranks on ties and near-misses.

Source: https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/best/consultants-agencies/