# Avoma vs Fireflies.ai

> Avoma vs Fireflies.ai: Fireflies.ai is our pick, leading for consultants & agencies and engineering teams. They split on crm integrations and key integrations.

This is the verified Avoma vs Fireflies.ai breakdown: Avoma (AI meeting assistant + revenue intelligence) and Fireflies.ai (AI meeting notetaker with CRM sync) are AI meeting notetakers platforms, priced from $19/seat/mo and $10/seat/mo respectively. The bottom line, head-to-head facts, and true cost tiers follow.

AI meeting notetakers platforms · 33 facts compared · all sourced · pricing verified Jul 20, 2026

## Bottom line

Fireflies.ai wins the overall record, taking five of seven use cases. On consultants and agencies, Fireflies.ai costs $10 per seat per month billed annually against Avoma's $19, deciding that use case. Separately, Fireflies.ai wins solo and free buyers with an actual free plan offering 400 minutes of storage per team and 20 AI credits, while Avoma has no free tier. For engineering teams Fireflies.ai integrates with Notion and Linear; for product and UX research and recruiters it exports transcripts in PDF, DOCX, SRT, CSV, JSON, and MD versus Avoma's VTT and TXT. Privacy and compliance is a tie, since both include a HIPAA BAA and exclude data from AI training. Avoma leads only on sales teams.

## Verdict summary

| Use case | Winner | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Consultants & Agencies | Fireflies.ai | On annual billing Fireflies.ai costs $10 per seat per month against Avoma's $19, nearly half the price, a decisive saving for agencies staffing many seats across client accounts. |
| Engineering Teams | Fireflies.ai | Fireflies.ai integrates with Slack, Notion, Zapier, Linear, and Airtable, putting meeting notes directly into the tools engineering teams already use for tracking work, including a dedicated connection to Linear. |
| Privacy & Compliance | Tie | Avoma and Fireflies.ai both include a HIPAA BAA and both exclude customer data from AI training, covering the two most important requirements for legal, healthcare, and security-conscious teams equally. |
| Product & UX Research | Fireflies.ai | Both tools offer clips and highlight reels, full video recording, and an ask-your-meeting AI chat, so the core research workflow is even. |
| Recruiters | Fireflies.ai | Both tools produce AI meeting summaries and speaker identification, so interview notes come out clean either way. |
| Sales Teams | Avoma | Avoma connects to five CRMs, Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Copper, and Zoho, versus four for Fireflies.ai, Salesforce, HubSpot, Affinity, and Redtail. |
| Solo & Free | Fireflies.ai | Avoma has no free tier at all, while Fireflies.ai offers a free plan with 400 minutes of storage per team and 20 AI credits, plus unlimited free transcription minutes, a real starting point for an individual before paying anything. |

## Avoma vs Fireflies.ai: head-to-head facts

| Fact | Avoma | Fireflies.ai | Verified |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Price per seat (billed monthly) | 29 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.avoma.com/pricing)) | 18 $/seat/mo ([source](https://fireflies.ai/pricing)) | Jul 20 |
| Price per seat (billed annually) | 19 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.avoma.com/pricing)) | 10 $/seat/mo ([source](https://fireflies.ai/pricing)) | Jul 20 |
| What the free tier caps | no free tier ([source](https://www.avoma.com/pricing)) | 400 min storage/team, 20 AI credits ([source](https://fireflies.ai/pricing)) | Jul 20 |
| Capture method | hybrid ([source](https://www.avoma.com/ai-meeting-assistant/meeting-recording-software)) | hybrid ([source](https://guide.fireflies.ai/articles/6666374717-how-to-record-meetings-without-a-bot-on-the-fireflies-desktop-app)) | Jul 20 |
| Bot-free capture option | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.avoma.com/ai-meeting-assistant/meeting-recording-software)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://guide.fireflies.ai/articles/6666374717-how-to-record-meetings-without-a-bot-on-the-fireflies-desktop-app)) | Jul 20 |
| Meeting platforms supported | Zoom, Google Meet, MS Teams, GoToMeeting ([source](https://www.avoma.com/integrations)) | Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, Webex, GoToMeeting ([source](https://fireflies.ai/integrations)) | Jul 20 |
| Languages supported | 60 ([source](https://www.avoma.com/ai-meeting-assistant/ai-meeting-transcription-software)) | ~100 ([source](https://guide.fireflies.ai/articles/2973706448-learn-about-fireflies-supported-languages)) | Jul 20 |
| AI meeting summary | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.avoma.com/ai-meeting-assistant)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://fireflies.ai/pricing)) | Jul 20 |
| SOC 2 Type II | ✓  SOC 2 Type II certified ([source](https://www.avoma.com/security)) | ✓  SOC 2 Type II ([source](https://fireflies.ai/security)) | Jul 20 |

## Avoma vs Fireflies.ai pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers

Real monthly bill for a team, from published per-seat rates on annual billing. Free-only or platform-bundled tools show n/a; their free-tier cap is the story.

| Volume | Buyer | Avoma | Fireflies.ai | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 seat | Solo / freelancer | $19/mo | $10/mo | A single user. Free tiers often cover this entirely. |
| 10 seats | Growing team | $190/mo | $100/mo | A whole team on paid seats; annual billing assumed. |
| 50 seats | Department | $950/mo | $500/mo | Company rollout. Most vendors negotiate at this size. |

## Avoma vs Fireflies.ai: verdicts by use case

### Consultants & Agencies → Fireflies.ai

On annual billing Fireflies.ai costs $10 per seat per month against Avoma's $19, nearly half the price, a decisive saving for agencies staffing many seats across client accounts. Both tools support in-person and mobile capture and both offer a bot-free option, so those points are even. Avoma does lead on storage: it offers unlimited recording on every plan, while Fireflies.ai caps storage at 8,000 minutes per seat on its Pro plan before going unlimited on Business and above. But for consultants and agencies where per-seat cost decides it, Fireflies.ai's lower price wins out.

### Engineering Teams → Fireflies.ai

Fireflies.ai integrates with Slack, Notion, Zapier, Linear, and Airtable, putting meeting notes directly into the tools engineering teams already use for tracking work, including a dedicated connection to Linear. Avoma's integrations, Slack, ClickUp, Outreach, Salesloft, and Aircall, lean more toward sales workflows. Both tools generate automatic action items, support a public API, and produce AI meeting summaries, so execution is even there. On an annual seat, Fireflies.ai costs $10 per month while Avoma costs $19 per month. For async engineering teams, Fireflies.ai is the stronger match.

### Privacy & Compliance → Tie

Avoma and Fireflies.ai both include a HIPAA BAA and both exclude customer data from AI training, covering the two most important requirements for legal, healthcare, and security-conscious teams equally. Both also offer a bot-free capture option and support GDPR and EU data residency, and both publish enterprise-level admin data-retention controls. On every point that decides this use case, the two tools are matched, so there is no clear edge either way for privacy and compliance buyers.

### Product & UX Research → Fireflies.ai

Both tools offer clips and highlight reels, full video recording, and an ask-your-meeting AI chat, so the core research workflow is even. Fireflies.ai pulls ahead on the details: Fireflies.ai exports transcripts in PDF, DOCX, SRT, CSV, JSON, and MD, far more formats than Avoma's VTT and TXT, and Fireflies.ai supports 100 languages while Avoma supports 60. For researchers who need flexible exports and broad language coverage across many interview sessions, Fireflies.ai is the better fit.

### Recruiters → Fireflies.ai

Both tools produce AI meeting summaries and speaker identification, so interview notes come out clean either way. Fireflies.ai pulls ahead on export: it supports PDF, DOCX, SRT, CSV, JSON, and MD, far more formats than Avoma's VTT and TXT, which matters directly for recruiters moving candidate transcripts into an ATS. Fireflies.ai is also cheaper on an annual seat, $10 versus Avoma's $19. With both the format flexibility and the price favoring it, Fireflies.ai is the stronger choice for recruiters.

### Sales Teams → Avoma

Avoma connects to five CRMs, Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Copper, and Zoho, versus four for Fireflies.ai, Salesforce, HubSpot, Affinity, and Redtail. For a typical sales team, Avoma's mix leans toward more widely used sales CRMs like Pipedrive and Zoho, where Fireflies.ai's extra coverage sits in niche tools like Affinity and Redtail. Both tools generate automatic action items, clips and highlight reels, and live transcription, so execution is even. On an annual seat, Fireflies.ai costs $10 per month while Avoma costs $19 per month, but the CRM fit is what decides this use case, and that favors Avoma.

### Solo & Free → Fireflies.ai

Avoma has no free tier at all, while Fireflies.ai offers a free plan with 400 minutes of storage per team and 20 AI credits, plus unlimited free transcription minutes, a real starting point for an individual before paying anything. When it is time to upgrade, Fireflies.ai's paid seat is also far cheaper, $18 per month versus Avoma's $29. Both tools include an AI meeting summary. For solo users and tiny teams prioritizing a capable free plan and the cheapest paid seat, Fireflies.ai is the clear winner.

## Avoma vs Fireflies.ai: common questions

### Is Avoma cheaper than Fireflies.ai?

Yes, Fireflies.ai is cheaper. Fireflies.ai costs $18/seat/mo billed monthly, or $10/seat/mo billed annually. Avoma costs $29/seat/mo billed monthly, or $19/seat/mo billed annually, so Fireflies.ai runs well below Avoma on either billing cycle.

### Avoma vs Fireflies.ai: which is better for consultants & agencies?

Fireflies.ai is the better fit for consultants and agencies. On an annual plan, Fireflies.ai costs $10/seat/mo versus Avoma's $19/seat/mo, nearly half the price across many client-facing seats. Both tools support in-person and mobile capture and a bot-free option, so the lower price decides it here.

### Does Avoma or Fireflies.ai have a free plan?

Fireflies.ai offers a free plan with 400 minutes of storage per team and 20 AI credits, plus unlimited transcription minutes. Avoma has no free tier at all, so solo users who want to try before paying should start with Fireflies.ai.

### Is Avoma or Fireflies.ai better for engineering teams?

Fireflies.ai is the better fit for engineering teams, integrating with Slack, Notion, Zapier, and Linear so standups and syncs land directly in the tools engineers use. Avoma's integrations, including ClickUp, Outreach, and Salesloft, lean more toward sales workflows.

### How many languages does Fireflies.ai support compared to Avoma?

Fireflies.ai supports 100 languages, compared to 60 for Avoma, giving Fireflies.ai broader language coverage for teams running meetings in multiple languages.

### What is an Avoma alternative with more transcript export formats?

Fireflies.ai is an Avoma alternative with far more export options, supporting PDF, DOCX, SRT, CSV, JSON, and MD. Avoma exports only in VTT and TXT, so teams that need flexible file formats may prefer Fireflies.ai.

### Does Avoma offer HIPAA compliance?

Yes. Avoma includes a HIPAA BAA for teams in healthcare, legal, or other regulated industries.

### Which CRMs does Avoma integrate with?

Avoma integrates with Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Copper, and Zoho.

Source: https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/avoma-vs-fireflies/