# Avoma vs Fathom

> Avoma vs Fathom: Avoma is our pick, leading for privacy & and product & ux research. They split on enterprise plan / sso and price per seat. Verified July 2026.

Both AI meeting notetakers platforms, Avoma (AI meeting assistant + revenue intelligence) and Fathom (Free-first AI meeting notetaker) go head to head here, priced from $19/seat/mo and $16/seat/mo respectively. Start with the bottom line, then the verified fact table and real production costs.

AI meeting notetakers platforms · 33 facts compared · all sourced · pricing verified Jul 20, 2026

## Bottom line

Avoma leads the overall record by winning four of seven use cases. It is the clear choice for privacy and compliance, excluding customer data from AI training where Fathom does not, and for sales teams, connecting to five CRMs, Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Copper, and Zoho, versus Fathom's two. For recruiters and product and UX research, Avoma exports transcripts in VTT and TXT formats, where Fathom supports copy and paste only, and Avoma covers 60 languages against Fathom's 38. Fathom counters with a lower price and a free plan, winning consultants and agencies, engineering teams, and solo and free buyers, but Avoma's broader compliance and integration strengths carry the overall verdict.

## Verdict summary

| Use case | Winner | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Consultants & Agencies | Fathom | On annual billing Fathom runs $16 per seat per month against Avoma's $19, a real saving for agencies staffing many seats across client accounts. |
| Engineering Teams | Fathom | Fathom integrates with Slack, Notion, Asana, and Zapier, putting meeting notes directly where async engineering teams track work, including Notion boards. |
| Privacy & Compliance | Avoma | Both Avoma and Fathom include a HIPAA BAA, so that requirement is covered either way. |
| Product & UX Research | Avoma | Both tools offer clips and highlight reels, full video recording, and an ask-your-meeting AI chat, so the core research workflow is even. |
| Recruiters | Avoma | Both tools produce AI meeting summaries and speaker identification, so interview notes come out clean either way. |
| Sales Teams | Avoma | Avoma connects to five CRMs, Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Copper, and Zoho, while Fathom covers just two, Salesforce and HubSpot. |
| Solo & Free | Fathom | Avoma has no free tier at all, while Fathom offers 5 advanced summaries per month with unlimited recording on its free plan, plus unlimited free-tier transcription minutes. |

## Avoma vs Fathom: head-to-head facts

| Fact | Avoma | Fathom | Verified |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Price per seat (billed monthly) | 29 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.avoma.com/pricing)) | 20 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.fathom.ai/pricing)) | Jul 20 |
| Price per seat (billed annually) | 19 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.avoma.com/pricing)) | 16 $/seat/mo ([source](https://www.fathom.ai/pricing)) | Jul 20 |
| What the free tier caps | no free tier ([source](https://www.avoma.com/pricing)) | 5 advanced summaries/mo; unlimited recording ([source](https://help.fathom.video/en/articles/5290881)) | Jul 20 |
| Capture method | hybrid ([source](https://www.avoma.com/ai-meeting-assistant/meeting-recording-software)) | hybrid ([source](https://www.fathom.ai/pricing)) | Jul 20 |
| Bot-free capture option | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.avoma.com/ai-meeting-assistant/meeting-recording-software)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.fathom.ai/overview)) | Jul 20 |
| Meeting platforms supported | Zoom, Google Meet, MS Teams, GoToMeeting ([source](https://www.avoma.com/integrations)) | Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams ([source](https://www.fathom.ai/integrations)) | Jul 20 |
| Languages supported | 60 ([source](https://www.avoma.com/ai-meeting-assistant/ai-meeting-transcription-software)) | 38 ([source](https://help.fathom.video/en/articles/296192)) | Jul 20 |
| AI meeting summary | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.avoma.com/ai-meeting-assistant)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://www.fathom.ai/pricing)) | Jul 20 |
| SOC 2 Type II | ✓  SOC 2 Type II certified ([source](https://www.avoma.com/security)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://help.fathom.video/en/articles/296512)) | Jul 20 |

## Avoma vs Fathom pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers

Real monthly bill for a team, from published per-seat rates on annual billing. Free-only or platform-bundled tools show n/a; their free-tier cap is the story.

| Volume | Buyer | Avoma | Fathom | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 seat | Solo / freelancer | $19/mo | $16/mo | A single user. Free tiers often cover this entirely. |
| 10 seats | Growing team | $190/mo | $160/mo | A whole team on paid seats; annual billing assumed. |
| 50 seats | Department | $950/mo | $800/mo | Company rollout. Most vendors negotiate at this size. |

## Avoma vs Fathom: verdicts by use case

### Consultants & Agencies → Fathom

On annual billing Fathom runs $16 per seat per month against Avoma's $19, a real saving for agencies staffing many seats across client accounts. Both tools support in-person and mobile capture and both offer a bot-free option, and both publish unlimited recording storage, so those points are even. Avoma does lead on transcript export, offering VTT and TXT files where Fathom is copy and paste only, useful for agencies archiving client transcripts. Since price is what decides this use case and Fathom is clearly cheaper, Fathom is the better fit.

### Engineering Teams → Fathom

Fathom integrates with Slack, Notion, Asana, and Zapier, putting meeting notes directly where async engineering teams track work, including Notion boards. Avoma's integrations, Slack, ClickUp, Outreach, Salesloft, and Aircall, lean more toward sales workflows. Both tools generate automatic action items, support a public API, and produce AI meeting summaries, so execution is even there. On an annual seat, Fathom costs $16 per month while Avoma costs $19 per month. For a team that wants standups landing hands-off in Notion or similar tools, Fathom is the stronger match.

### Privacy & Compliance → Avoma

Both Avoma and Fathom include a HIPAA BAA, so that requirement is covered either way. The decisive difference is AI training: Avoma excludes customer data from AI training, while Fathom does not, a meaningful gap for legal, healthcare, and security-conscious teams that need a no-training guarantee. Both tools offer a bot-free capture option and support GDPR and EU data residency. For teams where a strict no-training policy is non-negotiable, Avoma is the clear choice.

### Product & UX Research → Avoma

Both tools offer clips and highlight reels, full video recording, and an ask-your-meeting AI chat, so the core research workflow is even. Avoma pulls ahead on the details researchers rely on for cross-session work: it exports transcripts in VTT and TXT formats, while Fathom supports copy and paste only, and Avoma covers 60 languages against Fathom's 38. For researchers who need to export and search across sessions in multiple languages, Avoma is the better fit.

### Recruiters → Avoma

Both tools produce AI meeting summaries and speaker identification, so interview notes come out clean either way. Fathom is cheaper on an annual seat, $16 versus Avoma's $19, which matters for high-volume interviewing. But Avoma exports transcripts in VTT and TXT formats, while Fathom only supports copy and paste, a real limitation for recruiters who need clean files to move into an ATS. Since export quality is what interview transcripts most depend on, Avoma is the better fit despite costing more.

### Sales Teams → Avoma

Avoma connects to five CRMs, Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Copper, and Zoho, while Fathom covers just two, Salesforce and HubSpot. For sales teams whose top priority is getting every call synced to the CRM, that is a significant gap, particularly for reps on Pipedrive, Copper, or Zoho who would have no direct path with Fathom. Both tools generate automatic action items and clips and highlight reels, so the rest of the workflow is comparable. The wider CRM reach makes Avoma the stronger choice.

### Solo & Free → Fathom

Avoma has no free tier at all, while Fathom offers 5 advanced summaries per month with unlimited recording on its free plan, plus unlimited free-tier transcription minutes. That is a real starting point for an individual before paying anything. When it is time to upgrade, Fathom's paid seat is also cheaper, $20 per month versus Avoma's $29. Both tools include an AI meeting summary. For solo users and tiny teams prioritizing a capable free plan and a low entry price, Fathom is the clear winner.

## Avoma vs Fathom: common questions

### Is Avoma cheaper than Fathom?

Yes, Fathom is cheaper. Fathom costs $20/seat/mo billed monthly, or $16/seat/mo billed annually. Avoma costs $29/seat/mo billed monthly, or $19/seat/mo billed annually, so Fathom runs less on either billing cycle.

### Avoma vs Fathom: which is better for consultants & agencies?

Fathom is the better fit for consultants and agencies. On an annual plan, Fathom costs $16/seat/mo versus Avoma's $19/seat/mo, a meaningful saving across many client-facing seats. Both tools support in-person and mobile capture and a bot-free option, so pricing is what decides it here.

### Does Avoma or Fathom have a free plan?

Fathom offers a free plan with 5 advanced summaries per month and unlimited recording. Avoma has no free tier at all, so solo users who want to try before paying should start with Fathom.

### Is Avoma or Fathom better for engineering teams?

Fathom is the better fit for engineering teams, integrating with Slack, Notion, Asana, and Zapier so standups land directly where async work is tracked. Avoma's integrations, including ClickUp, Outreach, and Salesloft, lean more toward sales workflows.

### Does Avoma or Fathom exclude customer data from AI training?

Avoma excludes customer data from AI training. Fathom does not offer that guarantee, so privacy-conscious teams that need a strict no-training policy should choose Avoma.

### What is a Fathom alternative with more CRM integrations?

Avoma is a Fathom alternative with broader CRM coverage, connecting to Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Copper, and Zoho. Fathom covers only Salesforce and HubSpot, so sales teams on other CRMs may find Avoma a better match.

### How many languages does Fathom support?

Fathom supports 38 languages for transcription.

### Can I export transcripts from Fathom?

Fathom supports copy and paste only for transcripts, with no dedicated export file formats listed, which may matter for teams that need to archive or move transcripts into another system.

Source: https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/avoma-vs-fathom/