# 12 Best Gong Alternatives (2026)

> 12 verified Gong alternatives in AI meeting notetakers, led by Avoma (from $29/mo). Compared on real production cost and per-use-case verdicts. Updated August.

Gong is records, transcribes, and analyzes sales calls to coach reps and improve deal forecasting.. Teams that switch usually cite a cheaper per-seat price for the team, bot-free capture and stronger privacy terms, CRM sync and deal coaching for sales. The alternatives below are ranked by published head-to-head verdicts, not sponsorship.

## Where to switch, by reason

| Switching because of | See |
| --- | --- |
| a cheaper per-seat price for the team | [Fellow](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/best/consultants-agencies/) |
| bot-free capture and stronger privacy terms | [Bluedot](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/best/privacy-compliance/) |
| CRM sync and deal coaching for sales | [Jiminny](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/best/sales-teams/) |
| engineering teams | [Read AI](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/best/engineering-standups/) |
| recruiters | [Notta](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/best/recruiters/) |
| solo & free | [Fathom](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/best/solo-free/) |

## The Gong alternatives, ranked

| # | Tool | Positioning | vs Gong | Best if you need | Price | Rating |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Avoma](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/avoma/) | AI meeting assistant + revenue intelligence | vs Gong: ~15% fewer languages. | consultants & agencies, engineering teams, privacy & compliance, product & ux research, recruiters, sales teams, solo & free | From $29/mo |  |
| 2 | [Chorus by ZoomInfo](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/chorus-zoominfo/) | Conversation intelligence for revenue teams, bundled with ZoomInfo GTM data and CRM sync. |  | engineering teams | See pricing |  |
| 3 | [Clari Copilot](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/clari-copilot/) | Sales conversation intelligence (ex-Wingman) | vs Gong: about half the languages, no bot-free capture option. | engineering teams | See pricing |  |
| 4 | [Fireflies.ai](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/fireflies/) | AI meeting notetaker with CRM sync | vs Gong: ~45% more languages. | consultants & agencies, engineering teams, privacy & compliance, product & ux research, recruiters, sales teams, solo & free | From $18/mo |  |
| 5 | [Jiminny](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/jiminny/) | Mid-market conversation-intelligence platform positioned as a coaching-focused Gong/Chorus alternative for sales and revenue teams. | vs Gong: ~15% fewer languages, no bot-free capture option. | sales teams | From $42/mo |  |
| 6 | [Laxis](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/laxis/) | AI meeting assistant for revenue teams | vs Gong: ~45% more languages, no soc 2 type ii. | consultants & agencies, engineering teams, solo & free | From $15.99/mo |  |
| 7 | [Sybill](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/sybill/) | Positions as a bot-free AI sales assistant: an "Invisible Recorder" desktop app captures calls without a bot joining, then generates summaries, next steps, follow-up emails, and auto-fills CRM fields. | vs Gong: ~2× the languages. | consultants & agencies, engineering teams, solo & free | From $36/mo |  |
| 8 | [Bluedot](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/bluedot/) | Bot-free AI meeting notetaker | vs Gong: ~45% more languages. |  | From $18/mo |  |
| 9 | [BrightHire](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/brighthire/) | Interview intelligence for recruiting teams; now part of Zoom. |  |  | See pricing |  |
| 10 | [Bubbles](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/bubbles/) | Async video + AI meeting notetaker | vs Gong: no bot-free capture option. |  | From $15/mo |  |
| 11 | [Circleback](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/circleback/) | AI meeting notes + automations | vs Gong: ~45% more languages. |  | From $25/mo |  |
| 12 | [Colibri.ai](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/colibri/) | Real-time conversation intelligence for sales | vs Gong: no soc 2 type ii. |  | From $20/mo |  |
| 13 | [Microsoft Copilot in Teams](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/copilot-teams/) | Native AI meeting recap for Microsoft Teams | vs Gong: about half the languages. |  | From $25.20/mo |  |
| 14 | [Equal Time](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/equal-time/) | DEI meeting analytics + AI notes | vs Gong: ~45% more languages, no bot-free capture option. |  | From $18/mo |  |
| 15 | [Fathom](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/fathom/) | Free-first AI meeting notetaker | vs Gong: about half the languages. |  | From $20/mo |  |
| 16 | [Fellow](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/fellow/) | Privacy-first AI meeting assistant | vs Gong: ~35% more languages. |  | From $11/mo |  |
| 17 | [Gemini in Google Meet (Take notes for me)](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/gemini-meet/) | Native AI notetaker built into Google Meet | vs Gong: about half the languages. |  | From $16.80/mo |  |
| 18 | [Grain](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/grain/) | AI notetaker with clips & coaching |  |  | From $19/mo |  |
| 19 | [Granola](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/granola/) | Bot-free AI meeting notepad | vs Gong: about half the languages. |  | From $14/mo |  |
| 20 | [Jamie](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/jamie/) | Bot-free, privacy-first EU meeting notes | vs Gong: ~45% more languages, no soc 2 type ii. |  | From $25/mo |  |
| 21 | [Jump](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/jump/) | Vertical AI notetaker/co-pilot for wealth management: CRM-synced notes, pre-meeting prep, and follow-ups; SOC 2 Type II, 35,000+ advisors. |  |  | From $100/mo |  |
| 22 | [Krisp](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/krisp/) | Noise cancellation + AI meeting notes | vs Gong: about half the languages. |  | From $16/mo |  |
| 23 | [MeetGeek](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/meetgeek/) | AI meeting recorder & notetaker | vs Gong: ~45% more languages. |  | From $15.99/mo |  |
| 24 | [Metaview](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/metaview/) | Recruiting-vertical AI notetaker: captures interviews on Zoom/Meet/Teams/Webex and produces scorecard-ready, ATS-integrated candidate notes rather than generic meeting summaries. | vs Gong: ~30% fewer languages, no bot-free capture option. |  | From $100/mo |  |
| 25 | [Notta](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/notta/) | Multilingual AI meeting notetaker & transcription | vs Gong: ~15% fewer languages. |  | See pricing |  |
| 26 | [Otter.ai](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/otter-ai/) | AI meeting notetaker & transcription | vs Gong: about half the languages. |  | From $16.99/mo |  |
| 27 | [Read AI](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/read-ai/) | AI meeting + email copilot | vs Gong: about half the languages. |  | From $19.75/mo |  |
| 28 | [Rev](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/rev-max/) | Accuracy-first transcription + AI notetaker | vs Gong: about half the languages, no bot-free capture option. |  | From $29.99/mo |  |
| 29 | [Sembly AI](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/sembly/) | AI meeting notetaker & intelligence | vs Gong: ~30% fewer languages. |  | From $17/mo |  |
| 30 | [Spinach](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/spinach/) | AI meeting notes / AI scrum master | vs Gong: ~45% more languages, no bot-free capture option. |  | See pricing |  |
| 31 | [Supernormal](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/supernormal/) | Bot-free AI notetaker + agentic work | vs Gong: about half the languages. |  | From $20/mo |  |
| 32 | [Superpowered](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/superpowered/) | Privacy-first, bot-free meeting notes: no bots join calls, meetings are not recorded, audio is transcribed live and deleted immediately. | vs Gong: ~25% fewer languages. |  | From $25/mo |  |
| 33 | [Tactiq](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/tactiq/) | Bot-free AI meeting notetaker | vs Gong: ~15% fewer languages. |  | From $12/mo |  |
| 34 | [tl;dv](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/tldv/) | AI meeting recorder and notetaker | vs Gong: about half the languages. |  | From $29/mo |  |
| 35 | [Wudpecker](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/wudpecker/) | Positions on customizable, template-driven meeting notes with both a joining bot and a botless desktop recorder, EU-hosted (GDPR). | vs Gong: no soc 2 type ii. |  | From $19/mo |  |
| 36 | [Zoom AI Companion](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/zoom-ai-companion/) | Built-in meeting AI bundled with Zoom Workplace | vs Gong: about half the languages. |  | From $16.99/mo |  |

## How the top Gong alternatives compare

A closer look at the top 6: each Gong alternative's standing among AI meeting notetakers peers, its verdict record against Gong, and the trade-offs of leaving.

### 1. Avoma

Among the 30 ai meeting notetakers tools we track, Avoma has the 12th-widest language coverage.
In our published verdicts, Avoma beats Gong for consultants & agencies, engineering teams, privacy & compliance, product & ux research, recruiters, sales teams and solo & free.
The reverse angle matters too - Gong vs Avoma: ~15% more languages.
Published pricing starts at $19 per seat per month (annual billing), verified July 2026.

**Why teams switch (Consultants & Agencies):** Low per seat cost decides this for agencies billing across many client accounts, and Avoma's annual plan runs $19/seat/mo, a published rate Gong does not disclose. Both tools support in person and mobile capture and both offer a bot free option, so that need is covered either way. Avoma also includes unlimited recording storage, useful for archiving client engagements over time, while Gong's storage limit is not published. Transcript export matters too: Avoma exports directly to VTT and TXT, while Gong only makes transcripts available through its API in JSON, a heavier lift for non technical agency staff. [Consultants & Agencies verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/avoma-vs-gong/)

**Overall verdict:** Avoma wins across every use case here, from agencies watching per seat cost to teams that need a HIPAA BAA. Its annual seat price of $19/seat/mo is published while Gong keeps seat pricing undisclosed, a gap that shapes the consultants, engineering, recruiters, sales, and solo verdicts alike. For privacy and compliance, Avoma includes a HIPAA BAA that Gong does not publish. For CRM heavy sales teams, Avoma connects to five CRMs, Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Copper, and Zoho, against three for Gong. Avoma also exports transcripts directly as VTT and TXT, while Gong only offers them through its API in JSON.

Avoma cost: $19/seat/mo on annual billing ($29 billed monthly), verified Jul 20, 2026.

| Team size | Monthly bill |
| --- | --- |
| 1 seat | $19 |
| 10 seats | $190 |
| 50 seats | $950 |
[Full Avoma vs Gong comparison](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/avoma-vs-gong/) · [Avoma review](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/avoma/)

### 2. Chorus by ZoomInfo

Head-to-head, Chorus by ZoomInfo takes engineering teams from Gong and matches it for sales teams and solo & free.

**Why teams switch (Engineering Teams):** Both tools list Slack as a key integration, but Chorus by ZoomInfo also includes Zapier, a broad connector for automating tasks into other apps, alongside Clari and Gainsight. Gong's key integrations are Slack and MCP support. Both tools generate automatic action items, offer a public API, and provide an AI meeting summary, so those tie. Neither publishes an annual per-seat price. For async engineering teams that want standups to land as action items across a range of tools hands off, Chorus by ZoomInfo's Zapier connection gives it a slight edge. [Engineering Teams verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/chorus-zoominfo-vs-gong/)

**Overall verdict:** Gong leads the overall matchup with four outright wins against one for Chorus by ZoomInfo, with two use cases tied. Gong publishes several capabilities Chorus by ZoomInfo does not state at all: confirmed in-person and mobile capture, data excluded from AI training, GDPR and EU data residency support, an ask-your-meeting AI chat feature, and transcript export via its API in JSON. Those confirmed facts carry consultants and agencies, privacy and compliance, product and UX research, and recruiters for Gong. Chorus by ZoomInfo does take engineering teams, thanks to its Zapier integration, while sales teams and solo and free users are close enough to call ties.
[Full Chorus by ZoomInfo vs Gong comparison](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/chorus-zoominfo-vs-gong/) · [Chorus by ZoomInfo review](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/chorus-zoominfo/)

### 3. Clari Copilot

Among the 30 ai meeting notetakers tools we track, Clari Copilot has the 20th-widest language coverage.
Our use-case verdicts have Clari Copilot ahead of Gong for engineering teams and matches it for sales teams and solo & free.
Seen from the other side, Gong vs Clari Copilot: ~2× the languages, adds bot-free capture option.

**Why teams switch (Engineering Teams):** Both tools generate automatic action items and offer a public API, so the core automation is covered either way. Clari Copilot lists five key integrations, Slack, Outreach, Salesloft, RingCentral, and Okta, while Gong lists Slack and MCP support. Neither names Notion or Jira directly, but Clari Copilot's broader named integration list gives a team more confirmed hooks for routing meeting output into its existing stack. Both also produce an AI meeting summary. With more integrations actually named, Clari Copilot is the safer pick for a team that wants hands off routing today. Verdict: Clari Copilot wins. [Engineering Teams verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/clari-copilot-vs-gong/)

**Overall verdict:** Gong wins four of seven use cases: Consultants & Agencies, Privacy & Compliance, Product & UX Research, and Recruiters. Gong confirms in person and mobile capture plus a bot free capture option, both missing from Clari Copilot, and Gong publishes admin data retention controls with a three year standard alongside independently verified GDPR support, which decide compliance and client facing work. Gong also supports 70 languages against Clari Copilot's 37, and Gong adds an ask your meeting AI chat that Clari Copilot lacks. Clari Copilot's Slack, Outreach, Salesloft, RingCentral, and Okta integrations win it Engineering Teams, while Sales Teams and Solo & Free land as ties where neither tool publishes distinguishing pricing. Verdict: Gong wins.
[Full Clari Copilot vs Gong comparison](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/clari-copilot-vs-gong/) · [Clari Copilot review](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/clari-copilot/)

### 4. Fireflies.ai

Among the 30 ai meeting notetakers tools we track, Fireflies.ai has the 3rd-widest language coverage - a fit for multilingual and localization projects.
Our use-case verdicts have Fireflies.ai ahead of Gong for consultants & agencies, engineering teams, privacy & compliance, product & ux research, recruiters, sales teams and solo & free.
Seen from the other side, Gong vs Fireflies.ai: ~30% fewer languages.
Fireflies.ai lists $10 per seat per month (annual billing), verified July 2026.

**Why teams switch (Consultants & Agencies):** Fireflies.ai publishes a clear annual rate of $10/seat/mo, while Gong does not publish a per seat price at all and requires contacting sales, making costs hard to plan across many client accounts. Both tools support in person and mobile capture, and both offer a bot free way to join calls, so that need is matched. Fireflies.ai also documents its storage limit directly, 8,000 minutes per seat on Pro and unlimited on Business and above, where Gong publishes no storage limit. Fireflies.ai further exports transcripts in PDF, DOCX, SRT, CSV, and JSON, while Gong only offers transcripts via API in JSON. [Consultants & Agencies verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-gong/)
[Full Fireflies.ai vs Gong comparison](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/fireflies-vs-gong/) · [Fireflies.ai review](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/fireflies/)

### 5. Jiminny

Among the 30 ai meeting notetakers tools we track, Jiminny has the 12th-widest language coverage.
Head-to-head, Jiminny takes sales teams from Gong and matches it for engineering teams and solo & free.
Before switching, weigh what stays behind - Gong vs Jiminny: ~15% more languages, adds bot-free capture option.

**Why teams switch (Sales Teams):** CRM sync is what decides this for reps, and Jiminny publishes a longer list of CRM integrations: Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Close, Bullhorn, and Copper, against Gong's Salesforce, HubSpot, and MS Dynamics. Both tools generate automatic action items, so that ties. Neither publishes a comparable annual per-seat price here. Gong does offer live real-time transcription while Jiminny does not, a smaller plus, but it does not outweigh Jiminny's broader CRM reach, which is what sales teams syncing every call to the CRM care about most. Verdict: Jiminny wins. [Sales Teams verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/gong-vs-jiminny/)
[Full Jiminny vs Gong comparison](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/gong-vs-jiminny/) · [Jiminny review](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/jiminny/)

### 6. Laxis

Among the 30 ai meeting notetakers tools we track, Laxis has the 3rd-widest language coverage - a fit for multilingual and localization projects.
Head-to-head, Laxis takes consultants & agencies, engineering teams and solo & free from Gong.
Before switching, weigh what stays behind - Gong vs Laxis: ~30% fewer languages, adds soc 2 type ii.
Its published rate is $12.79 per seat per month (annual billing), verified July 2026.

**Why teams switch (Consultants & Agencies):** Laxis publishes an annual per-seat price of $12.79/seat/mo and unlimited paid storage, numbers Gong does not publish at all since it sells through custom contracts. For an agency billing against meetings across many accounts, that published low price and unlimited storage are a real advantage over a tool with no comparable published figures. Both support in-person and mobile capture and both offer a bot-free capture option, so those tie. Gong does publish a transcript export via API in JSON format, which Laxis does not list, but that does not outweigh Laxis's clear price and storage advantage. Verdict: Laxis wins. [Consultants & Agencies verdict](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/gong-vs-laxis/)
[Full Laxis vs Gong comparison](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/gong-vs-laxis/) · [Laxis review](https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/tools/laxis/)

Source: https://www.versusref.com/notetakers/alternatives/gong/