# Devin vs Factory

> Devin vs Factory: Factory is our pick, leading for beginners and enterprise. They split on how usage is metered and rate-limit window. Verified October 2026.

![Devin logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/devin.png) ![Factory logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/factory.png)

This is the verified Devin vs Factory breakdown: Devin (Autonomous cloud coding agent + terminal agent (Devin CLI); plans shared with Devin Desktop) and Factory (Agent-native dev platform; Droids work locally or as background/cloud agents. Secondary segment: terminal_agent (Droid CLI). Domain moved from factory.ai to factory.com (factory.ai 307-redirects).) are AI coding agents platforms, priced from $20/mo and $20/mo respectively. The bottom line, head-to-head facts, and true cost tiers follow.

AI coding agents platforms · 34 facts compared · all sourced · pricing verified Oct 2, 2026

## Bottom line

Factory wins five of seven use cases: Beginners, Enterprise, Local Models, Open Source and VS Code. It publishes checkpoints and rollback, which Devin does not, and its extension covers VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. It runs local models and supports custom models via OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoints, while Devin's own-key support is partial. For enterprise buyers, Devin states that self-serve plans may train on your code by default. Devin's one win is Free Plans, where it offers limited free usage that Factory does not publish, and Terminal Workflows is a tie. Both start at $20/mo, so Factory's broader feature fit decides it.

## Verdict summary

| Use case | Winner | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Beginners | Factory | Both start at $20/mo, and neither publishes how much usage the entry tier includes, so price does not separate them. |
| Enterprise | Factory | For a security review, training on company code matters most. |
| Free Plans | Devin | What a free plan actually allows is the deciding factor, and only Devin publishes one: a free plan with limited Devin usage. |
| Local Models | Factory | Running models on your own machine is the deciding factor, and only Factory publishes local model support. |
| Open Source | Factory | Neither Devin nor Factory publishes a license, a list of supported model providers, GitHub stars or a separate hosted option, so the main open source signals are missing on both sides. |
| Terminal Workflows | Tie | Both suit shell-first developers equally well. |
| VS Code | Factory | Editor support decides this, and Factory lists VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf through its extension, plus more. |

## Devin vs Factory: head-to-head facts

| Fact | Devin | Factory | Verified |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| How usage is metered | Time windows + $ usage pool ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/admin/billing/self-serve)) | Time windows + model multipliers + $ usage pool ([source](https://docs.factory.com/pricing/individuals)) | Oct 2 |
| What the free plan allows | "Limited Devin usage" ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/admin/billing/self-serve)) | n/a | Oct 2 |
| Cheapest paid plan (monthly) | $20 ([source](https://devin.ai/pricing)) | $20 ([source](https://factory.com/pricing)) | Oct 2 |
| Top individual plan | $200 ([source](https://devin.ai/pricing)) | $200 ([source](https://factory.com/pricing)) | Oct 2 |
| Rate-limit window | Daily + weekly allowance (Pro, Teams full seat) ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/admin/billing/self-serve)) | "three rolling windows ([source](https://docs.factory.com/pricing/individuals)) | Oct 2 |
| Bring your own API key | Partial: link ChatGPT Plus/Pro so GPT-model usage... ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/admin/billing/chatgpt)) | true (custom models via any OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible... ([source](https://factory.com/pricing)) | Oct 2 |
| Models available | Model selector (self-serve token-cost table, dated... ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/cli/models)) | Anthropic: Claude Fable 5.1, Fable 5 +30 more ([source](https://docs.factory.com/models)) | Oct 2 |
| Pick the model per task | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/cli/models)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.factory.com/models)) | Oct 2 |
| Runs local models | n/a | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.factory.com/model-independence/byok)) | Oct 2 |
| Where it runs | cloud (web app), CLI, desktop IDE (Devin Desktop) +4 more ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/devin-cli)) | desktop app (Factory App), CLI (Droid) +7 more ([source](https://factory.com/pricing)) | Oct 2 |
| Autonomous multi-file edits | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/advanced-capabilities)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.factory.com/autonomy-and-safety/auto-run)) | Oct 2 |
| Runs terminal commands | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/cli/reference/permissions)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.factory.com/autonomy-and-safety/auto-run)) | Oct 2 |
| Background / cloud agents | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/admin/billing/usage)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://factory.com/pricing)) | Oct 2 |
| Opens PRs from issues | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/integrations/linear)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.factory.com/remote-delegations/linear)) | Oct 2 |
| MCP support | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/devin-mcp)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.factory.com/harness/mcp)) | Oct 2 |
| Trains on your code? | Self-serve: may train by default ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/admin/security)) | "At Factory ([source](https://factory.com/security)) | Oct 2 |
| Zero data retention option | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/admin/security)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.factory.com/pricing/organizations)) | Oct 2 |
| Self-hosted / VPC deployment | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.devin.ai/enterprise/deployment/overview)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.factory.com/enterprise/network-and-deployment)) | Oct 2 |

## Devin vs Factory pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers

Real monthly cost at 3 developer profiles: hobbyist (~5 h/week), full-time developer (~25 h/week of daily agent use), team of 5. Most vendors do not publish how much usage a plan covers, so the full-time row spans the cheapest to the top individual plan unless the vendor publishes its own guidance for daily users. Bring-your-own-key and open-source agents show the model bill you pay the provider, never $0.

| Volume | Buyer | Devin | Factory | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ~5 h/week of agent use | Hobbyist | $20/mo | $20/mo | Side projects and evenings. Priced at each vendor's cheapest paid plan (annual billing where offered), the tier every vendor sells for light use. |
| ~25 h/week, daily multi-file agent tasks | Full-time developer | $20-$200/mo | $20-$200/mo | Daily agent use. Most vendors do not publish how much usage a plan covers, so this shows the span from the cheapest to the top individual plan; where a vendor publishes its own guidance for daily agent users, that figure is used instead. |
| 5 seats | Team of 5 | $200/mo | $260/mo | Priced from each vendor's own team plan: per-seat prices x 5, flat team plans as published. A tool with no published team price shows that rather than a guess. |

## Devin vs Factory: verdicts by use case

### Beginners → Factory

Both start at $20/mo, and neither publishes how much usage the entry tier includes, so price does not separate them. Factory publishes checkpoints and rollback, the easy undo a newer developer needs when the agent makes a mess; Devin does not publish that safety net. Devin does offer a free plan with limited Devin usage, which Factory does not publish. Both run across several surfaces, including a CLI. For a forgiving first experience, rollback outweighs a limited free allowance.

### Enterprise → Factory

For a security review, training on company code matters most. Devin states that on self-serve plans it may train on your code by default, while Factory's listing carries no such default. Otherwise the two match: both offer a self-hosted or VPC deployment, a zero data retention option, SOC 2 and admin audit logs. Devin offers enterprise SSO with Okta, Entra ID, SAML, OIDC and SCIM, while Factory offers SSO with SAML and SCIM provisioning on Business and Enterprise. Devin's default training on self-serve plans tips this to Factory.

### Free Plans → Devin

What a free plan actually allows is the deciding factor, and only Devin publishes one: a free plan with limited Devin usage. Factory does not publish a free plan. Factory is stronger on bringing your own key, supporting custom models via OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoints, while Devin's support is partial, linking a ChatGPT Plus or Pro account for GPT-model usage. Paid plans start at $20/mo on both, and Factory also runs local models. Even so, a real free allowance matters most for developers not ready to pay.

### Local Models → Factory

Running models on your own machine is the deciding factor, and only Factory publishes local model support. Factory also supports bringing your own key, with custom models via OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoints, while Devin's support is partial, limited to linking a ChatGPT Plus or Pro account. Neither publishes a license or a list of supported providers.

### Open Source → Factory

Neither Devin nor Factory publishes a license, a list of supported model providers, GitHub stars or a separate hosted option, so the main open source signals are missing on both sides. The one published difference is that Factory runs local models, which Devin does not publish. That gives Factory a slight edge for teams that want control over the model side, although neither shows the agent itself as open source.

### Terminal Workflows → Tie

Both suit shell-first developers equally well. Devin runs in the cloud, as a CLI and in a desktop IDE, among other surfaces, while Factory runs as a desktop app and as a CLI called Droid, among others. Both run terminal commands, offer background or cloud agents and support MCP. Both also take project guidance: Devin through scoped Knowledge notes and more, Factory through AGENTS.md. With a CLI and the same core capabilities on each side, neither pulls ahead.

### VS Code → Factory

Editor support decides this, and Factory lists VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf through its extension, plus more. Devin's editor support leads with its CLI running inside JetBrains IDEs and does not name VS Code among the editors it shows. Both make autonomous multi-file edits. Factory also publishes checkpoints and rollback, which Devin does not. Devin does offer codebase indexing, which Factory does not, but that matters less than working inside VS Code with an easy undo.

## Devin vs Factory: common questions

### Is Devin cheaper than Factory?

On individual plans, no: Devin and Factory both have a cheapest paid plan of $20/mo and a top individual plan of $200/mo. For teams, Devin lists $40/user/mo, while Factory charges $60/mo per team plus $40/mo per seat, so Devin comes out lower for a team. Devin also offers a free plan with limited usage, which Factory does not publish.

### Devin vs Factory: which is better for beginners?

Factory is the safer start. Both start at $20/mo, but Factory publishes checkpoints and rollback, an easy undo when the agent makes a mess, which Devin does not. Devin's advantage is a free plan with limited Devin usage, so you can try it before paying; Factory does not publish a free plan.

### Devin vs Factory team plan pricing: how do they compare?

Devin lists its team plan at $40/user/mo, while Factory charges $60/mo per team plus $40/mo per seat. Both offer an Enterprise plan through contact sales.

### Is Devin or Factory better for enterprise security?

Both offer a self-hosted or VPC deployment, a zero data retention option, SOC 2, admin audit logs and SSO. The main difference is training, since Devin states that its self-serve plans may train on your code by default.

### Is Factory a good alternative to Devin for local models?

Yes. Factory publishes local model support and lets you bring custom models via OpenAI- or Anthropic-compatible endpoints. Devin does not publish local model support, and its own-key support is partial, relying on linking a ChatGPT Plus or Pro account for GPT-model usage.

### How do Devin and Factory handle usage beyond the plan?

Devin sells prepaid on-demand credits that roll over and never expire, while Factory sells Extra Usage as prepaid credit. Devin meters with time windows plus a dollar usage pool, and Factory adds model multipliers to the same approach.

### Does Factory publish any benchmark results?

Factory claims a Terminal-Bench 2.0 score of 63.1% for Factory Droid, though this is a vendor claim.

### Where does Devin run?

Devin runs in the cloud through a web app, as a CLI, and in its desktop IDE, Devin Desktop, among other surfaces. The Devin CLI can also run inside JetBrains IDEs.

### Which models can I use in Factory?

Factory lists Anthropic models including Claude Fable 5.1 and Fable 5 among many more, and lets you pick the model per task.

Source: https://www.versusref.com/coding-agents/devin-vs-factory/