# Lovable vs Rocket.new

> Lovable vs Rocket.new: Rocket.new is our pick, leading for internal tools and mobile apps. They split on custom domain and keeps working if you stop paying.

![Lovable logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/lovable.png) ![Rocket.new logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/rocket-new.png)

Both AI app builders platforms, Lovable (AI full-stack app builder / "vibe coding" platform) and Rocket.new ("Vibe solutioning" platform for builders and founders, spanning Build (app generation), Solve (research), and Intelligence (competitor tracking)) go head to head here, priced from $21/mo and $25/mo respectively. Start with the bottom line, then the verified fact table and real production costs.

AI app builders platforms · 30 facts compared · all sourced · pricing verified Aug 31, 2026

## Bottom line

Rocket.new takes the overall lead by winning three use cases, Internal Tools, Mobile Apps, and UI Design, against two for Lovable, with two ties. Rocket.new publishes 26+ connectors and a bring-your-own Supabase backend IT teams can point at their own instance, ships a native mobile output where Lovable's is a progressive web app, and offers a verified Figma import Lovable does not have on record. Lovable answers back by winning Developers, thanks to a GitHub sync with no stack restriction, and Free Plans, with a clearer daily credit cadence than Rocket.new's flat 20 credit cap.

## Verdict summary

| Use case | Winner | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Beginners | Tie | Both tools give a beginner the same starting point: each includes an autonomous agent that builds from chat, and each lets you click an element to fix it without touching code. |
| Developers | Lovable | Both export the full project as source code, Lovable as a full project and Rocket.new as a downloadable zip, so that part of the hard filter is even. |
| Free Plans | Lovable | What the free plan actually caps matters most, and Lovable spells out a specific cadence: 5 credits a day, up to 30 a month. |
| Internal Tools | Rocket.new | For ops and IT teams wiring dashboards into existing systems, Rocket.new publishes 26+ connectors, while Lovable does not publish an integrations count at all, leaving no confirmed number to compare. |
| Mobile Apps | Rocket.new | Mobile output decides this one: Rocket.new's mobile output is native, while Lovable's is a progressive web app rather than an installable native build. |
| Self-Hosted | Tie | Neither Lovable nor Rocket.new publishes whether it can run offline as a local-first tool, what license it ships under, or whether it accepts your own API keys instead of a subscription, the details that would decide this use case for someone who wants to run the builder itself rather than just its output. |
| UI Design | Rocket.new | The import step decides this for design-led teams, and Rocket.new publishes a verified Figma and screenshot import that Lovable does not have on record, so Rocket.new is the confirmed option for turning an existing design into a working front end. |

## Lovable vs Rocket.new: head-to-head facts

| Fact | Lovable | Rocket.new | Verified |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Metering unit | credits ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/user-guides/credits)) | credits ([source](https://docs.rocket.new/getting-started/credits)) | Aug 31 |
| What the free plan caps | 5 build credits/day up to 30/mo ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/introduction/subscription-plans)) | 20 credits ([source](https://www.rocket.new/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| Cheapest paid plan (monthly) | $25 ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/introduction/subscription-plans)) | $25 ([source](https://www.rocket.new/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| Cheapest paid plan (annual) | $21 ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/introduction/subscription-plans)) | n/a | Aug 31 |
| Metering pool at entry plan | 100 credits/mo ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/introduction/subscription-plans)) | 100 credits/mo ([source](https://www.rocket.new/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| Published per-action unit cost | Plan mode: 1 credit/message. Build mode illustrative exam... ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/user-guides/credits)) | n/a | Aug 31 |
| Output stack | React + TypeScript ([source](https://lovable.dev/)) | Next.js/React (web apps ([source](https://docs.rocket.new/getting-started/introduction)) | Aug 31 |
| Backend model | Lovable Cloud (managed Supabase: Postgres ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/integrations/supabase)) | BYO Supabase (auto-provisioned or connect an existing Sup... ([source](https://docs.rocket.new)) | Aug 31 |
| Code export | full project ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/integrations/git-integration)) | full project (download as .zip) ([source](https://docs.rocket.new/help/faq)) | Aug 31 |
| GitHub sync | bidirectional ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/integrations/git-integration)) | bidirectional (Next.js/TypeScript projects only) ([source](https://docs.rocket.new/integrations/github)) | Aug 31 |
| Self-host the output | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/integrations/git-integration)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.rocket.new/integrations/github)) | Aug 31 |
| Keeps working if you stop paying | Published apps remain accessible/viewable after cancellation ([source](https://lovable.dev/terms)) | Projects remain viewable ([source](https://docs.rocket.new/help/faq)) | Aug 31 |
| Mobile output | pwa ([source](https://lovable.dev/faq/capabilities/mobile/lovable-mobile-app)) | native ([source](https://docs.rocket.new/getting-started/introduction)) | Aug 31 |
| Agent mode (autonomous multi-step builds) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/user-guides/credits)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.rocket.new)) | Aug 31 |
| Figma / screenshot import | n/a | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.rocket.new)) | Aug 31 |
| Element-level editing | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/introduction/faq)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://docs.rocket.new)) | Aug 31 |
| Training-on-your-code policy | From 2026-09-09 ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/features/business/data-opt-out)) | Paid users: "Your projects are never used for AI training... ([source](https://docs.rocket.new/help/faq)) | Aug 31 |
| Public API | ✗  No ([source](https://docs.lovable.dev/integrations/lovable-api)) | n/a | Aug 31 |

## Lovable vs Rocket.new pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers

True monthly cost at 3 builder profiles: weekend prototyper (1 app, ~40 edit prompts/mo), active builder (2-3 apps, ~250 edit prompts/mo), small team (5 seats, continuous). Vendors with a published per-action cost resolve to a real $/mo; effort-based or unpublished metering renders honestly as "metered - conversion not published" rather than a guess. Open-source/local tools show license + BYO-API-key cost, never $0.

| Volume | Buyer | Lovable | Rocket.new | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 app, ~40 edit prompts/mo | Weekend prototyper | $21/mo | $25/mo, 100 credits/mo included - metered, conversion not published | A single side project, built once and lightly iterated on over a weekend or two a month. |
| 2-3 apps, ~250 edit prompts/mo | Active builder | $28.50-$141/mo | $25/mo, 100 credits/mo included - metered, conversion not published | Several projects in flight at once with a steady daily edit cadence - the volume where a credit pool that looked generous at signup starts to run out. |
| 5 seats, continuous builds | Small team | $50/mo | $25/mo, 100 credits/mo included - metered, conversion not published | A 5-person team building continuously. Priced off each vendor's own published team/business plan, not a per-seat guess - pooled-credit workspaces (Lovable, Rocket) do not simply multiply the solo price by seat count, so a tool with no published flat team rate renders honestly as not published rather than an invented multiply. |

## Lovable vs Rocket.new: verdicts by use case

### Beginners → Tie

Both tools give a beginner the same starting point: each includes an autonomous agent that builds from chat, and each lets you click an element to fix it without touching code. Rocket.new adds a verified Figma and screenshot import that Lovable does not have on record, while Lovable spells out its free plan precisely, 5 credits a day up to 30 a month, versus Rocket.new's flat 20 credits with no stated daily cadence. Both charge the same $25/mo to unlock a paid plan. With the biggest capabilities matched and the two remaining differences cancelling each other out, there is no clear favorite for a first-time builder.

### Developers → Lovable

Both export the full project as source code, Lovable as a full project and Rocket.new as a downloadable zip, so that part of the hard filter is even. GitHub sync is where they split: Lovable's sync is bidirectional across projects, while Rocket.new's bidirectional sync only works for Next.js and TypeScript projects, a real restriction for anyone scaffolding in another stack. Both let you self-host the generated output. On the backend, Rocket.new's bring-your-own Supabase setup gives developers more direct control of the database than Lovable's managed Supabase through Lovable Cloud, but the GitHub sync restriction is the bigger practical filter.

### Free Plans → Lovable

What the free plan actually caps matters most, and Lovable spells out a specific cadence: 5 credits a day, up to 30 a month. Rocket.new's free plan is capped at 20 credits with no published refresh pattern, so it is less clear how usage renews over time. Both charge $25/mo for their cheapest paid plan, and both let unused credits roll over. Rocket.new says projects remain viewable after you stop paying, and Lovable says published apps stay accessible too, so continuity looks similar. The clearer free-tier structure gives Lovable a slight edge for someone testing the waters.

### Internal Tools → Rocket.new

For ops and IT teams wiring dashboards into existing systems, Rocket.new publishes 26+ connectors, while Lovable does not publish an integrations count at all, leaving no confirmed number to compare. Rocket.new's backend model also lets you bring your own Supabase instance, auto-provisioned or connected to one you already run, giving IT more control over where company data lives, while Lovable's backend is a managed Supabase instance inside Lovable Cloud. Both include built-in auth and real time collaboration, and both gate single sign-on behind their top tier. With more published integrations and a more flexible backend, Rocket.new is the stronger fit for reaching the systems a business already runs on.

### Mobile Apps → Rocket.new

Mobile output decides this one: Rocket.new's mobile output is native, while Lovable's is a progressive web app rather than an installable native build. Rocket.new's web output stack is Next.js and React, and its backend lets you bring your own Supabase instance, auto-provisioned or connected to one you already run. Lovable's output stack is React and TypeScript with a managed Supabase backend through Lovable Cloud. Both let you self-host the generated project and both include an autonomous agent mode, so those do not change the outcome. For someone who specifically wants a native mobile build rather than a web wrapper, Rocket.new is the one that delivers it.

### Self-Hosted → Tie

Neither Lovable nor Rocket.new publishes whether it can run offline as a local-first tool, what license it ships under, or whether it accepts your own API keys instead of a subscription, the details that would decide this use case for someone who wants to run the builder itself rather than just its output. The one point both do cover is that the generated app can be self-hosted elsewhere once it is built, and both support that equally. Without published facts on running the builder locally, its licensing, or a bring-your-own-key billing model, there is no basis to call a winner here.

### UI Design → Rocket.new

The import step decides this for design-led teams, and Rocket.new publishes a verified Figma and screenshot import that Lovable does not have on record, so Rocket.new is the confirmed option for turning an existing design into a working front end. Both tools let you click an element and edit it directly without prompting, so the polish workflow itself is even. Their output stacks are close too, Lovable produces React and TypeScript while Rocket.new produces Next.js and React for web apps, both React-based. Both support real time collaboration and version rollback equally. The published import capability gives Rocket.new the edge.

## Lovable vs Rocket.new: common questions

### Is Lovable cheaper than Rocket.new?

Not on the monthly plan. Lovable and Rocket.new both charge $25/mo for their cheapest paid plan, so there is no difference there. Lovable does publish a lower annual rate of $21/mo when billed yearly, an option Rocket.new does not have listed, which could make Lovable cheaper over a year.

### Lovable vs Rocket.new: which is better for beginners?

It's close. Both include an autonomous agent and let you click an element to edit it directly. Rocket.new publishes a verified Figma and screenshot import that Lovable does not have on record, while Lovable spells out a clearer free plan cadence, 5 credits a day up to 30 a month, versus Rocket.new's flat 20 credits. Both charge $25/mo for their cheapest paid plan, so neither has a clear overall edge for a first-time builder.

### Does Lovable or Rocket.new produce native mobile apps?

Rocket.new's mobile output is native. Lovable's mobile output is a progressive web app rather than a native build. If a true native app matters for your project, Rocket.new is the one that publishes that capability.

### Is Lovable or Rocket.new better for internal tools with lots of integrations?

Rocket.new publishes 26+ connectors for reaching outside systems. Lovable does not publish an integrations count, so there is no confirmed number to compare it against. For a team that needs to wire into many existing business systems, Rocket.new is the one with a published figure.

### Does Lovable or Rocket.new offer a Figma import?

Rocket.new publishes a verified Figma and screenshot import. Lovable does not have this feature listed as a fact on record, so there is no confirmed way to import a design file directly into Lovable.

### How many credits does Rocket.new's free plan include?

Rocket.new's free plan caps you at 20 credits. Unused credits roll over, the same as on its paid plans.

### Does GitHub sync work the same way on Lovable and Rocket.new?

Not quite. Lovable's GitHub sync is bidirectional without a stated stack restriction. Rocket.new's GitHub sync is also bidirectional, but only for Next.js and TypeScript projects, so a project built in another stack on Rocket.new may not get the same two-way sync.

### What happens to my Rocket.new project if I stop paying?

Rocket.new says projects remain viewable even after you stop paying, so you keep access to what you built rather than losing it outright.

### Is there a per-seat charge for team plans on Lovable or Rocket.new?

Lovable's Business plan starts at $50/mo for a pool of 100 credits. Rocket.new states there is no per-seat charge on its team plan, a different pricing structure than Lovable's credit-pool-based team pricing.

Source: https://www.versusref.com/app-builders/lovable-vs-rocket-new/