# Bolt.new vs v0

> Bolt.new vs v0: Bolt.new is our pick, leading for beginners and developers. They split on code export and github sync. Verified August 2026.

![Bolt.new logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/bolt-new.png) ![v0 logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/v0.png)

Bolt.new (AI full-stack app builder, prompt-to-app in the browser) and v0 (AI UI/full-stack generation agent, tightly integrated with the Vercel platform) are AI app builders platforms, priced from $25/mo and $30/mo respectively. Below: the bottom line, verified head-to-head facts, and real production costs.

AI app builders platforms · 26 facts compared · all sourced · pricing verified Aug 31, 2026

## Bottom line

Bolt.new wins the overall matchup, taking three of the seven use cases against v0's two, with two ties. It leads for beginners and free plans: its no-charge tier is capped at a stated 300,000 tokens per day and 1,000,000 tokens per month, while v0's trial caps out at $5 of monthly credits and 7 messages per day, and Bolt.new's paid plan costs less at $25/mo against v0's $30/mo. Bolt.new also wins for developers, since its GitHub sync runs bidirectional while v0's runs one way. v0 pulls ahead for internal tools and UI design, and mobile apps and self-hosting come out even.

## Verdict summary

| Use case | Winner | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Beginners | Bolt.new | Both hand a beginner an autonomous agent that builds from a prompt, and both support Figma or screenshot import to start from a real design, so the core building experience is matched. |
| Developers | Bolt.new | Both hand back a full project on code export, Bolt.new outright and v0 through a connected GitHub repo, so that filter is matched. |
| Free Plans | Bolt.new | What the trial tier actually allows matters most here, and Bolt.new states a firm number: 300,000 tokens per day and 1,000,000 tokens per month before paying anything. |
| Internal Tools | v0 | v0 documents Vercel Marketplace integrations, including a Neon database connection, giving an ops team a named path to reach the systems the business already runs on. |
| Mobile Apps | Tie | Neither tool is built for a phone over a browser tab. |
| Self-Hosted | Tie | Someone who wants to run the app builder itself, not just its output, needs answers on offline operation, licensing, and bring-your-own API key billing, and neither Bolt.new nor v0 addresses any of those here. |
| UI Design | v0 | Both tools cover the entry point a designer needs, Figma or screenshot import, in the same verified way, so that does not separate them. |

## Bolt.new vs v0: head-to-head facts

| Fact | Bolt.new | v0 | Verified |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Metering unit | tokens ([source](https://bolt.new/pricing)) | credits (dollar-denominated ([source](https://vercel.com/blog/updated-v0-pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| What the free plan caps | 300,000 tokens/day, 1,000,000 tokens/mo ([source](https://bolt.new/pricing)) | $5 of included monthly credits; 7 messages/day limit ([source](https://v0.app/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| Cheapest paid plan (monthly) | $25 ([source](https://bolt.new/pricing)) | $30 ([source](https://v0.app/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| Metering pool at entry plan | 10,000,000 tokens/mo (starting point ([source](https://bolt.new/pricing)) | $30 of credits/mo per user ([source](https://v0.app/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| Published per-action unit cost | n/a | Per-model token rates published: v0 Mini $0.20-$1.20/M to... ([source](https://v0.app/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| Output stack | Full-stack JS/TS web projects (framework varies by templa... ([source](https://bolt.new/)) | Next.js, React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui ([source](https://v0.app/docs)) | Aug 31 |
| Backend model | BYO Supabase (native integration: auth ([source](https://bolt.new/)) | BYO via one-click Vercel Marketplace integrations: Neon (... ([source](https://v0.app/docs/databases)) | Aug 31 |
| Code export | full project ([source](https://support.bolt.new/)) | full project (via connected GitHub repo ([source](https://v0.app/docs/github)) | Aug 31 |
| GitHub sync | bidirectional ([source](https://support.bolt.new/)) | one_way (GitHub as source of truth ([source](https://v0.app/docs/github)) | Aug 31 |
| Self-host the output | ✓  Yes ([source](https://support.bolt.new/)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://v0.app/docs/github)) | Aug 31 |
| Mobile output | n/a | none ([source](https://v0.app/docs)) | Aug 31 |
| Agent mode (autonomous multi-step builds) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://bolt.new/)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://v0.app/docs)) | Aug 31 |
| Figma / screenshot import | ✓  Yes ([source](https://support.bolt.new/integrations/figma)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://vercel.com/blog/working-with-figma-and-custom-design-systems-in-v0)) | Aug 31 |
| Training-on-your-code policy | "We may use AI Inputs and AI Outputs to operate ([source](https://stackblitz.com/privacy-policy)) | Enterprise customers can opt out of having their content... ([source](https://v0.app/docs/security)) | Aug 31 |
| Public API | n/a | ✓  Yes ([source](https://v0.app/docs)) | Aug 31 |

## Bolt.new vs v0 pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers

True monthly cost at 3 builder profiles: weekend prototyper (1 app, ~40 edit prompts/mo), active builder (2-3 apps, ~250 edit prompts/mo), small team (5 seats, continuous). Vendors with a published per-action cost resolve to a real $/mo; effort-based or unpublished metering renders honestly as "metered - conversion not published" rather than a guess. Open-source/local tools show license + BYO-API-key cost, never $0.

| Volume | Buyer | Bolt.new | v0 | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 app, ~40 edit prompts/mo | Weekend prototyper | $25/mo, 10,000,000 tokens/mo (starting point included - metered, conversion not published | $30/mo, $30 of credits/mo per user included - metered, conversion not published | A single side project, built once and lightly iterated on over a weekend or two a month. |
| 2-3 apps, ~250 edit prompts/mo | Active builder | $25/mo, 10,000,000 tokens/mo (starting point included - metered, conversion not published | $30/mo, $30 of credits/mo per user included - metered, conversion not published | Several projects in flight at once with a steady daily edit cadence - the volume where a credit pool that looked generous at signup starts to run out. |
| 5 seats, continuous builds | Small team | $25/mo, 10,000,000 tokens/mo (starting point included - metered, conversion not published | $30/mo, $30 of credits/mo per user included - metered, conversion not published | A 5-person team building continuously. Priced off each vendor's own published team/business plan, not a per-seat guess - pooled-credit workspaces (Lovable, Rocket) do not simply multiply the solo price by seat count, so a tool with no published flat team rate renders honestly as not published rather than an invented multiply. |

## Bolt.new vs v0: verdicts by use case

### Beginners → Bolt.new

Both hand a beginner an autonomous agent that builds from a prompt, and both support Figma or screenshot import to start from a real design, so the core building experience is matched. The difference shows up in what a first app actually costs to learn on. Bolt.new's entry-level allowance runs 300,000 tokens per day and 1,000,000 tokens per month. v0's starting allowance is much tighter: $5 of monthly credits capped at 7 messages per day, a ceiling that can be used up in a single session. Bolt.new's paid plan also costs less to move up to, $25/mo against v0's $30/mo. With the build experience tied and both the trial allowance and the paid price favoring Bolt.new, it is the stronger starting point for a first app.

### Developers → Bolt.new

Both hand back a full project on code export, Bolt.new outright and v0 through a connected GitHub repo, so that filter is matched. Where they split is how the code flows afterward: Bolt.new's GitHub sync runs bidirectional, so changes made in the repo can flow back in, while v0's sync is one way with GitHub only acting as the source of truth, meaning edits mostly travel in one direction. For an engineer who wants the agent to scaffold and then step out of the way, a two-way sync fits that workflow better. Both let you self-host the output. v0 does publish a public API, which Bolt.new does not address, but that does not outweigh the sync gap for this crowd.

### Free Plans → Bolt.new

What the trial tier actually allows matters most here, and Bolt.new states a firm number: 300,000 tokens per day and 1,000,000 tokens per month before paying anything. v0's trial instead gives $5 of monthly credits and caps you at 7 messages per day, a ceiling that can run out in one sitting. Bolt.new is also the lower-priced next step at $25/mo, while v0's equivalent plan costs $30/mo, and unused credits roll over on both. Custom domains sit behind Bolt.new's Pro tier, while v0 ties domains to its Vercel project settings, neither a clean edge either way. With both the trial ceiling and the paid price favoring it, Bolt.new is the stronger choice for trying before committing.

### Internal Tools → v0

v0 documents Vercel Marketplace integrations, including a Neon database connection, giving an ops team a named path to reach the systems the business already runs on. Bolt.new does not publish a comparable integrations story, only that its backend is a bring-your-own Supabase setup with native auth wiring. Single sign-on also opens up sooner on v0, available on its Team plan as well as Enterprise, while Bolt.new restricts SSO to Enterprise only. Neither tool builds authentication in by default, so that stays even. Both support multiplayer collaboration. With a documented integrations path and earlier SSO access, v0 fits internal-tools buyers better here.

### Mobile Apps → Tie

Neither tool is built for a phone over a browser tab. v0 states outright that it has no mobile output, and Bolt.new describes its own output stack as full-stack JS/TS web projects, with no mobile output claimed at all, so both land in the same place: a real native build is not on offer from either. Their web output stacks differ, v0 names Next.js, React, Tailwind CSS and shadcn/ui specifically while Bolt.new keeps it general, but that distinction is about web front ends, not mobile. Both let you self-host the output and both run in an agent mode. With the one attribute that actually decides this use case coming back empty on both sides, there is no basis to prefer one over the other.

### Self-Hosted → Tie

Someone who wants to run the app builder itself, not just its output, needs answers on offline operation, licensing, and bring-your-own API key billing, and neither Bolt.new nor v0 addresses any of those here. Both are cloud services with nothing on record about a local-first mode, a self-hosting license, or a BYO API key path around their subscription. The one point either tool speaks to is that the finished output can itself be self-hosted, and both answer yes to that the same way, so it does not break the tie either. Since the actual deciding questions, running the platform outside the vendor's own cloud, go unanswered by both, neither has an edge for this use case.

### UI Design → v0

Both tools cover the entry point a designer needs, Figma or screenshot import, in the same verified way, so that does not separate them. Neither publishes details on element-level, click-to-tweak editing after the import lands, leaving that question open on both sides. Where they differ is what comes out the other end: v0's output stack is named specifically as Next.js, React, Tailwind CSS and shadcn/ui, a defined design-system pairing built for consistent visual polish, while Bolt.new's stack is described only generally as full-stack JS/TS web projects that vary by template. Both support collaboration for a design-led team. The more specific, design-oriented output stack gives v0 a slight edge for going from import to a polished front end.

## Bolt.new vs v0: common questions

### Is Bolt.new cheaper than v0?

Yes. Bolt.new's cheapest paid plan costs $25/mo, while v0's cheapest paid plan costs $30/mo. Bolt.new is the lower-priced entry point between the two. Usage is metered differently though: Bolt.new bills by tokens and v0 by dollar-denominated credits, so actual cost still depends on how much you build.

### Bolt.new vs v0: which is better for beginners?

Bolt.new is the better pick for beginners. Both give you an autonomous agent that builds from a prompt and both support Figma or screenshot import. Bolt.new's entry-level allowance is 300,000 tokens per day and 1,000,000 tokens per month, while v0's trial caps out at $5 of monthly credits and just 7 messages per day. Bolt.new's paid plan also costs less, $25/mo against v0's $30/mo.

### Does Bolt.new or v0 give bidirectional GitHub sync?

Bolt.new's GitHub sync is bidirectional, so changes made directly in the repository can flow back into the project. v0's sync runs one way, with GitHub acting as the source of truth, so edits mainly travel from v0 outward. If you need repo-side changes to flow back in, Bolt.new supports that and v0 does not.

### Is Bolt.new or v0 better for internal tools?

v0 is the stronger fit. It documents integrations through the Vercel Marketplace, including a Neon database connection, and opens SSO on its Team plan as well as Enterprise. Bolt.new does not publish a comparable integrations list and keeps SSO behind its Enterprise plan only.

### Does Bolt.new or v0 have a public API?

v0 offers a public API, according to v0. Bolt.new does not have a published public API among its listed details, so there is no confirmed way to script its build workflow from outside its own interface.

### What does v0's free plan actually give you?

v0's free plan includes $5 of monthly credits and caps usage at 7 messages per day. Both limits reset monthly, but the daily message cap can be used up quickly if you are actively iterating on a project.

### Can I self-host what Bolt.new or v0 builds?

Yes for both. Bolt.new's generated output can be self-hosted rather than staying on Bolt.new's own hosting, and v0's output can likewise be self-hosted outside Vercel's deployment path.

### Does v0 have SOC 2 certification?

Yes, v0 has SOC 2 certification. Bolt.new does not have a published SOC 2 status among these details, so its standing on that specific certification is not confirmed here.

### What framework does v0 generate code in?

v0 generates output built on Next.js, React, Tailwind CSS and shadcn/ui, a modern React stack paired with a component design system, according to v0's own description of its output.

Source: https://www.versusref.com/app-builders/bolt-new-vs-v0/