# Bolt.new vs Meku

> Bolt.new vs Meku: Bolt.new is our pick, leading for beginners and developers. They split on what the free plan caps and cheapest paid plan. Verified August.

![Bolt.new logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/bolt-new.png) ![Meku logo](https://www.versusref.com/logos/meku.png)

Bolt.new (AI full-stack app builder, prompt-to-app in the browser) and Meku (Developer-angle prompt-to-app builder emphasizing full code ownership) are AI app builders platforms, priced from $25/mo and $12/mo respectively. Below: the bottom line, verified head-to-head facts, and real production costs.

AI app builders platforms · 23 facts compared · all sourced · pricing verified Aug 31, 2026

## Bottom line

Bolt.new sweeps every use case where a real difference exists. It supports Figma and screenshot import while Meku's own pages state it does not, deciding Beginners and UI Design. Its GitHub sync is bidirectional against Meku's own conflicting claims about the feature, deciding Developers. Its free plan caps at 300,000 tokens per day with credits that roll over, beating Meku's tighter 100 credits per month with no rollover. Bolt.new also offers SSO on its Enterprise plan for Internal Tools, where Meku has no equivalent fact. Mobile Apps and Self-Hosted ended in ties, since neither documents native mobile output or a way to run the builder locally.

## Verdict summary

| Use case | Winner | Why |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Beginners | Bolt.new | Bolt.new supports Figma and screenshot import, letting a beginner fix a bad result without touching code, while Meku's own pages state it does not support design import. |
| Developers | Bolt.new | Both tools export the full project as code, satisfying one hard filter equally. |
| Free Plans | Bolt.new | Bolt.new's free plan caps at 300,000 tokens per day and 1,000,000 tokens per month, and Bolt.new's unused credits roll over. |
| Internal Tools | Bolt.new | For a real data backend, both rely on a bring-your-own Supabase setup, with Bolt.new's documentation adding a native integration for auth on top, which matters for the role-gated access an internal tool needs. |
| Mobile Apps | Tie | Neither tool is built for mobile. |
| Self-Hosted | Tie | Builders who want to run the app builder itself need facts about running offline, the license, and paying through their own API keys instead of a subscription. |
| UI Design | Bolt.new | Figma and screenshot import is the core requirement for going from a design file straight to a front end, and Bolt.new supports it while Meku's own vendor pages state it does not. |

## Bolt.new vs Meku: head-to-head facts

| Fact | Bolt.new | Meku | Verified |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Metering unit | tokens ([source](https://bolt.new/pricing)) | credits ([source](https://meku.dev/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| What the free plan caps | 300,000 tokens/day, 1,000,000 tokens/mo ([source](https://bolt.new/pricing)) | 100 credits/month ([source](https://meku.dev/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| Cheapest paid plan (monthly) | $25 ([source](https://bolt.new/pricing)) | $22 ([source](https://meku.dev/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| Cheapest paid plan (annual) | n/a | $12 ([source](https://meku.dev/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| Metering pool at entry plan | 10,000,000 tokens/mo (starting point ([source](https://bolt.new/pricing)) | 800 credits/month, 200 credits/day cap ([source](https://meku.dev/pricing)) | Aug 31 |
| Output stack | Full-stack JS/TS web projects (framework varies by templa... ([source](https://bolt.new/)) | React + Tailwind ([source](https://meku.dev/docs)) | Aug 31 |
| Backend model | BYO Supabase (native integration: auth ([source](https://bolt.new/)) | BYO Supabase ([source](https://meku.dev/docs/integrations)) | Aug 31 |
| Code export | full project ([source](https://support.bolt.new/)) | full project ([source](https://meku.dev/docs/clone-website)) | Aug 31 |
| GitHub sync | bidirectional ([source](https://support.bolt.new/)) | conflicting: 'Live now ([source](https://meku.dev/docs/integrations)) | Aug 31 |
| Self-host the output | ✓  Yes ([source](https://support.bolt.new/)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://meku.dev/docs/clone-website)) | Aug 31 |
| Mobile output | n/a | none ([source](https://meku.dev/docs)) | Aug 31 |
| Agent mode (autonomous multi-step builds) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://bolt.new/)) | ✓  Yes ([source](https://meku.dev/)) | Aug 31 |
| Figma / screenshot import | ✓  Yes ([source](https://support.bolt.new/integrations/figma)) | ✗  No ([source](https://meku.dev/docs/integrations)) | Aug 31 |
| Training-on-your-code policy | "We may use AI Inputs and AI Outputs to operate ([source](https://stackblitz.com/privacy-policy)) | n/a | Aug 31 |

## Bolt.new vs Meku pricing: true cost at 3 usage tiers

True monthly cost at 3 builder profiles: weekend prototyper (1 app, ~40 edit prompts/mo), active builder (2-3 apps, ~250 edit prompts/mo), small team (5 seats, continuous). Vendors with a published per-action cost resolve to a real $/mo; effort-based or unpublished metering renders honestly as "metered - conversion not published" rather than a guess. Open-source/local tools show license + BYO-API-key cost, never $0.

| Volume | Buyer | Bolt.new | Meku | Note |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 app, ~40 edit prompts/mo | Weekend prototyper | $25/mo, 10,000,000 tokens/mo (starting point included - metered, conversion not published | $12/mo, 800 credits/month, 200 credits/day cap included - metered, conversion not published | A single side project, built once and lightly iterated on over a weekend or two a month. |
| 2-3 apps, ~250 edit prompts/mo | Active builder | $25/mo, 10,000,000 tokens/mo (starting point included - metered, conversion not published | $12/mo, 800 credits/month, 200 credits/day cap included - metered, conversion not published | Several projects in flight at once with a steady daily edit cadence - the volume where a credit pool that looked generous at signup starts to run out. |
| 5 seats, continuous builds | Small team | $25/mo, 10,000,000 tokens/mo (starting point included - metered, conversion not published | $12/mo, 800 credits/month, 200 credits/day cap included - metered, conversion not published | A 5-person team building continuously. Priced off each vendor's own published team/business plan, not a per-seat guess - pooled-credit workspaces (Lovable, Rocket) do not simply multiply the solo price by seat count, so a tool with no published flat team rate renders honestly as not published rather than an invented multiply. |

## Bolt.new vs Meku: verdicts by use case

### Beginners → Bolt.new

Bolt.new supports Figma and screenshot import, letting a beginner fix a bad result without touching code, while Meku's own pages state it does not support design import. Both tools run an autonomous build agent. Bolt.new's starting plan caps usage at 300,000 tokens per day and 1,000,000 tokens per month before any charge applies. Meku's starting plan caps usage at 100 credits per month before any charge applies, a much tighter monthly allowance with no daily figure. Once you do pay, Meku's plan costs $22/mo and Bolt.new's plan costs $25/mo. That small price gap does not offset the missing design import or the tighter starting allowance.

### Developers → Bolt.new

Both tools export the full project as code, satisfying one hard filter equally. The other, real GitHub sync, favors Bolt.new: it states bidirectional sync plainly, while Meku's own pages give conflicting claims about whether the feature is live, leaving developers unable to rely on it. Both let you self-host the generated output. On the backend, Bolt.new documents a native Supabase integration alongside the bring-your-own database, while Meku documents a plainer bring-your-own Supabase setup. With code export tied and GitHub sync clouded by Meku's own inconsistent documentation, Bolt.new is the safer pick for engineers who want the AI to scaffold and get out of the way.

### Free Plans → Bolt.new

Bolt.new's free plan caps at 300,000 tokens per day and 1,000,000 tokens per month, and Bolt.new's unused credits roll over. Meku's free plan caps at a flat 100 credits per month, and Meku confirms unused credits do not roll over. That gives Bolt.new more room to actually build before hitting a wall, the biggest factor for trying a tool before paying. Meku's cheapest paid plan costs $22/mo, or $12/mo when Meku is billed annually, undercutting Bolt.new's cheapest paid plan at $25/mo. Meku also includes a custom domain on every plan including Free, where Bolt.new reserves that for Pro and above. Close on the secondary points, but the free tier itself favors Bolt.new.

### Internal Tools → Bolt.new

For a real data backend, both rely on a bring-your-own Supabase setup, with Bolt.new's documentation adding a native integration for auth on top, which matters for the role-gated access an internal tool needs. Bolt.new also offers SSO on its Enterprise plan, a fact Meku does not have on record. Meku counters with a named integrations list, GitHub, Figma, and Supabase, giving ops teams a documented way to reach systems the business already runs, something Bolt.new has no equivalent fact for. Both support team collaboration. With SSO and a more detailed backend integration tipping it, Bolt.new edges out Meku's documented integrations here.

### Mobile Apps → Tie

Neither tool is built for mobile. Meku explicitly states it has no mobile output, and Bolt.new does not claim any mobile output either, its documented stack is full-stack JS/TS web projects, the same web-only shape as Meku's React and Tailwind output. Both let you self-host the generated output and both run an autonomous build agent, but those points do not help a builder targeting a phone rather than a browser tab. With one tool outright confirming no mobile output and the other simply having nothing to show for it, this is a wash for anyone who needs a native app.

### Self-Hosted → Tie

Builders who want to run the app builder itself need facts about running offline, the license, and paying through their own API keys instead of a subscription. Neither Bolt.new nor Meku publishes any of those: both are hosted products with no local-first mode, no open license, and no bring-your-own-key billing on record. The one fact both share is that you can self-host the generated output, which both Bolt.new and Meku confirm as yes. With no vendor facts separating them on the core requirement of running the builder itself, this comes down even.

### UI Design → Bolt.new

Figma and screenshot import is the core requirement for going from a design file straight to a front end, and Bolt.new supports it while Meku's own vendor pages state it does not. Output stack differs too: Bolt.new produces full-stack JS/TS web projects while Meku is built specifically on React and Tailwind, a narrower but still web-focused stack. Both tools support collaboration and versioning with rollback, so a team can work together and step back from a bad change either way. But those shared strengths do not close the gap on the one capability this use case is built around, and only Bolt.new has it.

## Bolt.new vs Meku: common questions

### Is Bolt.new cheaper than Meku?

Meku is cheaper on paper: its cheapest paid plan is $22/mo, or $12/mo when billed annually, against Bolt.new's cheapest paid plan at $25/mo. But Meku's credits do not roll over between billing periods, while Bolt.new's unused credits do, and Meku's free plan caps at just 100 credits per month versus Bolt.new's free plan at 300,000 tokens per day. The lower price comes with a tighter, non-rolling allowance.

### Bolt.new vs Meku: which is better for beginners?

Bolt.new is the better pick for beginners. It supports Figma and screenshot import, letting a newcomer fix a bad result without touching code, while Meku's own pages state it does not support design import. Bolt.new's free plan caps at 300,000 tokens per day and 1,000,000 tokens per month, well beyond Meku's free plan cap of 100 credits per month. Meku's cheapest paid plan costs $22/mo versus Bolt.new's $25/mo, but that does not offset the gaps above.

### Does Bolt.new or Meku have reliable GitHub sync?

Bolt.new states its GitHub sync is bidirectional. Meku's own pages give conflicting claims about whether GitHub sync is live, so developers should verify current status before relying on it.

### Is Bolt.new or Meku better for Figma import?

Bolt.new supports Figma and screenshot import. Meku's own pages state it does not support design import, so Bolt.new is the pick for going from a design file to a front end.

### Do unused credits roll over on Bolt.new or Meku?

Bolt.new's unused credits roll over. Meku's do not, so unused Meku credits are lost at the end of the billing cycle.

### Which plan includes a custom domain, Bolt.new or Meku?

Meku includes a custom domain on all plans, including its Free plan. Bolt.new only unlocks a custom domain on its Pro tier and above.

### How many integrations does Meku offer?

Meku names 3 integrations: GitHub, Figma, and Supabase.

### What does Meku's team plan cost compared with Bolt.new's?

Meku's team plan costs $69/mo, compared with Bolt.new's team plan at $30 per member per month.

Source: https://www.versusref.com/app-builders/bolt-new-vs-meku/